Decision Making and Ride Comfort Evaluation Based on Lane-Change Prediction for Autonomous Vehicles
Organizations: Computer Engineering Department, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Predicting surrounding vehicles' lane-change intentions enables autonomous vehicles to anticipate potential hazards and respond proactively rather than relying solely on reactive maneuvers. This study investigates the benefits of integrating lane-change prediction, based on knowledge graph embeddings and Bayesian inference, into autonomous vehicle decision-making. Three driving strategies are evaluated in risky merging scenarios simulated in CARLA: reactive driving, prediction-based longitudinal action, and prediction-based lateral action. The proposed prediction model anticipates the surrounding vehicle's lane change approximately 3-4 seconds before its occurrence, allowing the ego vehicle to adjust its behavior accordingly. In the representative simulation records, reactive driving results in a collision accompanied by aggressive deceleration. In contrast, prediction-based longitudinal action initiates early braking to establish a safe gap, while prediction-based lateral action performs a lane change when a safe adjacent lane is available. Both predictive strategies avoid collisions in the evaluated records. Compared with reactive driving, peak deceleration before impact is reduced by 31.5% with longitudinal action and 91.0% with lateral action. Additionally, an ISO 2631-1-based horizontal vibration estimate is used to provide a ride comfort assessment. Overall, the results highlight the potential of lane-change prediction to support safer and smoother driving through proactive decision-making, with additional insights into ride comfort provided by vibration-based estimates.
Figures & tables
| Metric | Reactive | Anticipatory braking | Lateral avoidance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak deceleration (m/s 2 ) | 6.427 | 4.406 | 0.578 |
| Peak (m/s 2 ) | 0.131 | 0.130 | 0.530 |
| Peak (m/s 3 ) | 11.853 | 4.116 | 1.087 |
| Peak (m/s 3 ) | 0.275 | 0.279 | 0.882 |
| (m/s 2 ) | 3.366 | 2.658 | 0.230 |
| (m/s 2 ) | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.388 |
| Driving strategy | |||
| Reactive driving | 1.51 | 0.17 | 1.52 |
| Anticipatory braking | 1.41 | 0.16 | 1.42 |
| Lateral avoidance | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.53 |
| ISO 2631-1 Annex C discomfort ranges | RMS range | ||
| Not uncomfortable | |||
| A little uncomfortable | 0.315–0.63 | ||
Autonomous Driving Planning
Autonomous driving planning selects safe, feasible vehicle actions and trajectories amid traffic, uncertainty, road rules, and changing goals.
See all 385 papers