stat.MLOct 22, 2026

Continuous-depth Deep Gaussian Processes

Authors: Ying Li, Sanyou Wu, Zi Yang, Qiaochu Xu, Yuhao Liu, Zhidi Lin, Michael Minyi Zhang, Petar Djuric, 

Organizations: National University of Singapore · Columbia University · The University of Hong Kong · Capital One · 

Abstract

Deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) are appealing Bayesian regression models, but their standard discrete-depth parameterization often becomes harder to optimize as depth grows. We argue that depth is better treated as a latent continuous evolution than as a long discrete stack. We therefore propose a continuous-depth formulation in which the latent representation follows a stochastic differential equation with a depth-indexed drift family equipped with a GP-based prior. This reframes the core design choice as the prior placed on that family, rather than adopting a purely neural continuous-depth parameterization as in neural ODE or neural SDE models. We study two instantiations of this idea: CDGP, a direct GP prior over the state--depth drift, and FlowDGP, a flow-evolved prior that captures richer depth dependence at lower training cost. To motivate the redesign, we analyze how the single-sample DGP objective can become increasingly sensitive under repeated layer composition, while residual DGP is a useful first repair that still remains a finite discrete construction. We also give pathwise sensitivity analysis for the continuous-depth formulation. Experiments on synthetic, benchmark, and large-scale regression tasks show that residual DGP improves over plain DGP, while CDGP and FlowDGP provide a stronger overall story across the regimes we study.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables6 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Oct 27, 2026

Efficient Deep Gaussian Process Surrogates via Mini-Batch Latent MAP Estimation

Deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) are flexible surrogate models for computer experiments with nonstationary response surfaces, but inference over their latent representations remains computationally challenging. Existing methods typically rely on variational inference or Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), which impose variational-family assumptions or require costly posterior sampling. We propose the latent maximum-a-posteriori deep Gaussian process (LaMP-DGP), which uses gradient-based optimization to obtain MAP estimates of the latent representations and enables efficient probabilistic prediction through linked-GP calculations. To scale LaMP-DGP to large datasets, we develop a mini-batch optimization algorithm and, under a polynomial mini-batch bias-decay condition, establish a stationarity bound for latent-state optimization that motivates a growing batch-size schedule. Across numerical experiments and real-data analyses, LaMP-DGP provides consistently competitive predictive performance relative to doubly stochastic variational inference, stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, and fully Bayesian Vecchia DGP inference. Computationally, LaMP-DGP is substantially faster than the Vecchia MCMC approach while remaining broadly competitive with the stochastic-gradient alternatives. These results position LaMP-DGP as a competitive and computationally efficient alternative for DGP inference. An R package, "LaMPDGP", is available for implementing the proposed method.
Jun 6, 2026

How Deep Are Deep GPs, Really? A Sharp Threshold and a Non-Gaussian Limit for Compositional GPs

Compositional priors describe the generic properties of layered functions in deep Bayesian models, where deep neural networks with random weights are a canonical example.In the wide-network limit, the prior is a Gaussian process with a depth-dependent kernel, and its behaviour as depth grows has been extensively studied through this kernel. Here, we study another case, where each layer itself is a vector valued Gaussian process, and our aim is similarly to understand the limiting behaviour of the prior as depth grows. Previous GP work has established that for the RBF kernel and a certain range of bandwidths rr, the prior degenerates in the limit, converging to the set of constant functions -- which is not useful as a probabilistic model. In this paper we establish several new results. First, we identify a sharp bandwidth threshold rc(d)=Θ(d)r_c(d) = Θ(\sqrt{d}) above which the limit is degenerate, strengthening the earlier bounds. Second, and more importantly, we show that for rr below the threshold rc(d)r_c(d) the prior converges to a limit distribution πZˉπ_{\bar{Z}}. We also prove that these distributions are non-degenerate and non-Gaussian, with non-vanishing dependence between coordinates. In contrast to the previously known degenerate regime, deep Gaussian process priors can therefore admit non-trivial limits. Empirically, we verify the threshold across a range of dimensions dd, and demonstrate a complex multimodal behaviour of the limit distributions πZˉπ_{\bar{Z}} -- a regime that becomes increasingly narrow with dd and would be hard to identify without knowing the threshold.
May 22, 2026

Onsager-Machlup Posterior Transport for Deep Gaussian Processes

Approximate inference over inducing variables is the central computational bottleneck of Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs). Existing methods either fit an explicit density qφ(\bU)q_φ(\bU) by an ELBO (DSVI, IPVI, DDVI, DBVI) or sample by MCMC (SGHMC). We instead frame DGP inference as posterior transport: learn a deterministic sampler that maps a tractable reference measure to posterior-relevant inducing variables, regularised by a path prior derived from the Doob-bridged reference diffusion. Our realisation, OM-Path (formally FBVI-bridge-Path), uses Song's probability-flow ODE applied to DBVI's Doob-bridged forward SDE; the reference drift is closed-form from the bridge marginal coefficients (no score matching) and the path regulariser is the Onsager--Machlup action. At the finite-εε value used at training, the objective is the negative log unnormalised density of a tempered Doob-bridge path posterior, and Theorem 1 identifies it with the same posterior's small-noise MAP path via the Freidlin--Wentzell LDP. Two strict path-space ELBO variants on the same bridge backbone (FFJORD log-det; OM-regularised CNF) are derived as ablations. Under a matched-seed paired Wilcoxon test against DBVI on seven UCI regression benchmarks, OM-Path delivers statistically significant wins on the two largest datasets (power: p ⁣= ⁣0.014p\!=\!0.014, NLL 0.012\mathbf{0.012} matching the DSVI baseline of 0.0170.017; protein: p ⁣= ⁣0.002p\!=\!0.002, RMSE 0.716\mathbf{0.716} vs.\ 0.7640.764, NLL 1.086\mathbf{1.086} vs.\ 1.1491.149), statistical ties on yacht / qsar, and concedes boston / energy / concrete to DBVI on small-NN noisy data. The strict-ELBO variants do not clear DBVI on any UCI metric: in this regime, reducing the variance of the path objective dominates exact-density tracking.