cs.LGJun 6, 2026

How Deep Are Deep GPs, Really? A Sharp Threshold and a Non-Gaussian Limit for Compositional GPs

Authors: Mark KozdobaShie Mannor

Organizations: Technion, IIT · NVIDIA

Abstract

Compositional priors describe the generic properties of layered functions in deep Bayesian models, where deep neural networks with random weights are a canonical example.In the wide-network limit, the prior is a Gaussian process with a depth-dependent kernel, and its behaviour as depth grows has been extensively studied through this kernel. Here, we study another case, where each layer itself is a vector valued Gaussian process, and our aim is similarly to understand the limiting behaviour of the prior as depth grows. Previous GP work has established that for the RBF kernel and a certain range of bandwidths rr, the prior degenerates in the limit, converging to the set of constant functions -- which is not useful as a probabilistic model. In this paper we establish several new results. First, we identify a sharp bandwidth threshold rc(d)=Θ(d)r_c(d) = Θ(\sqrt{d}) above which the limit is degenerate, strengthening the earlier bounds. Second, and more importantly, we show that for rr below the threshold rc(d)r_c(d) the prior converges to a limit distribution πZˉπ_{\bar{Z}}. We also prove that these distributions are non-degenerate and non-Gaussian, with non-vanishing dependence between coordinates. In contrast to the previously known degenerate regime, deep Gaussian process priors can therefore admit non-trivial limits. Empirically, we verify the threshold across a range of dimensions dd, and demonstrate a complex multimodal behaviour of the limit distributions πZˉπ_{\bar{Z}} -- a regime that becomes increasingly narrow with dd and would be hard to identify without knowing the threshold.

Explore similar work

May 28, 2026cs.LG

Kernel Renormalization in Bayesian Deep Neural Networks: the Equivalent Wishart Ansatz in the Proportional Regime

The scaling limit where both the size of the training set PP and the width NN of a deep neural network grow at the same rate, the so-called proportional-width regime, has been intensely studied for shallow, single-hidden-layer networks. However, extending these non-perturbative results from shallow architectures to deep non-linear networks has proven very challenging. Here we present an effective approximate approach to predict the generalization performance of Bayesian multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) of fixed depth LL on arbitrary high-dimensional data. We propose an equivalent Wishart Ansatz to capture the dominant stochastic fluctuations of the hierarchical empirical kernels of MLPs. This allows us to perform a large deviation analysis for the partition function of MLPs in the proportional limit, expressed in terms of a renormalized NNGP kernel. In this description, even strong representation learning in the proportional limit is encoded in at most LL scalar order parameters, determined self-consistently. Extending the approach to convolutional architectures (CNNs), we identify a hierarchical local kernel renormalization mechanism, which allows to quantify more complex data-dependent transformations of the large-width kernel in CNNs due to finite-width effects. We test our effective theory against sampling experiments from the Bayesian posterior of finite deep neural networks with depths LO(10)L \sim O(10) and PO(103)P\sim O(10^3) on classic benchmark datasets, finding overall very good agreement together with two distinct types of systematic deviations.
Paolo Baglioni, Christian Keup, Vincenzo Zimbardo +4
Jul 10, 2026stat.ML

Deep Gaussian Processes on Directed Acyclic Graphs

Many real-world processes can be represented as compositions of functions along a directed acyclic graph (DAG). In causal modelling, these correspond to the underlying mechanisms; in engineering, to multiple fidelity levels; and in gene-regulatory networks, to transcription factors. These functions are partially observed across the DAG, with noisy and heterogeneously sampled measurements, posing significant challenges for reconstruction, uncertainty propagation, and inference. To tackle these challenges, we place priors over functions and naturally arrive at Deep Gaussian Processes over DAGs. We theoretically study their prior-collapse behaviour, and the effect of graph topology and intermediate observations on the preservation of information. We obtain almost-sure lower bounds on the asymptotic frequency of depths at which the distinction between inputs is preserved, identify broad kernel classes for which these hold, and prove an observation by \cite{dunlop2018} on the role of input connections. We offer a structured variational approximation that retains graph dependencies, preserves compositional uncertainty, and captures the explaining-away behaviour of colliders. Finally, we empirically validate our theoretical results and our methodology, and model a latent-collider DAG, a protein signalling network, and a multi-fidelity heavy-ion collision emulation task, attaining state-of-the-art performance while recovering low-fidelity contributions and yielding interpretability of the simulator hierarchy.
Federico L. Perlino, Oliver Hamelijnck, Adam M. Johansen +1
May 29, 2026math.ST

Bayesian Inference with Shaped Deep Non-linear MLPs

A central aim of deep learning theory is to characterize how neural networks make predictions in the regime of simultaneously large model and training set size. Since the limits of diverging number of model parameters and dataset size do not commute it is not clear a priori what limits exist. In this work, we shed new light on these questions by studying Bayesian inference in deep non-linear MLPs in the regime where the number of training samples (PP), the input dimension (N0N_0), the hidden layer width (NN), and the number of hidden layers (LL) can all be large. We build on the Neural Covariance SDE (Li et al., 2022) to analyze predictive posteriors in the regime where LP/NΘ(1)LP/N\inΘ(1), playing the role of an effective network depth. Our framework covers both smooth and ReLU activation functions and applies to arbitrary temperature. We find to first order in LP/NLP/N a simple criterion for which data generating processes benefit from depth in the sense that larger LP/NLP/N increases the Bayesian model evidence. We also give a novel derivation of a prior result from the physics literature that at least to first order in LP/NLP/N, the Bayesian predictive posterior is remarkably simple and is simply equivalent to that of a data-dependent kernel method.
Boris Hanin, Tianze Jiang