Multichoice Modeling: Exploring Decision Configuration Space under Uncertainty

Decision-making in real applications is often affected by vagueness, incomplete information, heterogeneous data, and conflicting expert opinions. This survey reviews uncertainty-aware multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and organizes the field into a concise, task-oriented taxonomy. We summarize problem-level settings (discrete, group/consensus, dynamic, multi-stage, multi-level, multiagent, and multi-scenario), weight elicitation (subjective and objective schemes under fuzzy/linguistic inputs), and inter-criteria structure and causality modelling. For solution procedures, we contrast compensatory scoring methods, distance-to-reference and compromise approaches, and non-compensatory outranking frameworks for ranking or sorting. We also outline rule/evidence-based and sequential decision models that produce interpretable rules or policies. The survey highlights typical inputs, core computational steps, and primary outputs, and provides guidance on choosing methods according to robustness, interpretability, and data availability. It concludes with open directions on explainable uncertainty integration, stability, and scalability in large-scale and dynamic decision environments.

Complex engineered systems require coordinated design choices across heterogeneous components under conflicting objectives and uncertain specifications. Monotone co-design provides a compositional framework for such problems. Performance of each subsystem is modeled with a design problem: a relation specifying what resources suffice to provide each functionality. Existing uncertain co-design models rely on interval bounds, which support worst-case reasoning but cannot represent probabilistic risk or multi-stage adaptive decisions. We develop a distributional extension of co-design that models uncertain design outcomes as distributions over design problems and supports adaptive decision processes through Markov-kernel re-parameterizations. Using quasi-measurable and quasi-universal spaces, we show that the standard co-design compositions remain compositional under this richer uncertainty, and introduce queries and observations extracting probabilistic trade-offs, including feasibility probabilities, confidence bounds, and distributions of minimal required resources. A task-driven unmanned aerial vehicle case study shows how the framework captures risk-sensitive and information-dependent design choices that interval models cannot express.

Decision-making under risk is typically studied through single-shot lottery choices. Yet many real decisions involve combinatorial risk, where risk arises from multiple risky components, so the lottery over outcomes is induced rather than given outright and can be costly to evaluate exactly. We introduce an investment-allocation task to study decision under combinatorial risk, where investing in a component raises its success probability and thereby reshapes the outcome distribution. Participants favor the option with the larger probability increment, and, when increments are equal, the option with the higher initial success probability. Revealing the induced probability mass function (PMF) substantially changes behavior, making participants less responsive to combinatorial-risk features and reducing choice variance. To explain these patterns, we move beyond standard benchmarks and hand-crafted hypotheses with symbolic regression to discover compact descriptive models. The discovered models rely mainly on combinatorial-risk features, such as the after-investment success probability, rather than exact evaluation of the full induced distribution. Behavior under the displayed PMF is then well explained by augmenting this model with a prospect-theoretic residual model. The results show that people navigate combinatorial risk primarily through its core features, shifting toward lottery valuation only when the induced PMF is displayed.