Efficient communication remains a major bottleneck in large language model multiagent systems. Latent communication reduces repeated natural-language exchange by transferring internal model states between agents, but these transfers remain costly and are typically designed around conventional KV-cache representations. We address this problem from two complementary perspectives. We introduce SelectKV, a boundary-aware method that selectively communicates KV states while protecting inherited context, and HyLaMAS, which extends latent collaboration to hybrid linear-attention models by communicating both KV caches and recurrent states through a shared workspace. Across six benchmarks, SelectKV reduces communicated KV positions and logical KV payload by 9.7-9.9%, with accuracy unchanged on two benchmarks, within one percentage point on three, and six points lower on HumanEval+. Across Qwen3.5 model scales, HyLaMAS reduces decoded output tokens by 53-80% and achieves 1.16-2.78x speedups relative to text-based multi-agent communication. Together, these independently evaluated methods represent two complementary approaches to efficient latent-state communication across conventional Transformer and hybrid model architectures.
Figures & tables
ARC-E
ARC-C
GSM8K
Metric
LM
SKV-90
Δ
LM
SKV-90
Δ
LM
SKV-90
Δ
Acc.
99.0 [97.0, 100.0]
99.0 [97.0, 100.0]
0.0
90.0 [84.0, 95.0]
90.0 [84.0, 95.0]
0.0
94.0 [89.0, 98.0]
93.0 [88.0, 98.0]
↓ 1.0
Token
461.89
429.23
↓ 7.1%
561.03
515.62
↓ 8.1%
622.16
626.78
↑ 0.7%
KV Pos.
1023.04
923.42
↓ 9.7%
1099.60
992.28
↓ 9.8%
1068.46
964.29
↓ 9.7%
Payload
143.87
129.86
↓ 9.7%
154.63
139.54
↓ 9.8%
150.25
135.60
↓ 9.7%
Time
16.31
14.83
× 1.10
19.33
17.81
× 1.09
21.31
21.87
× 0.97
Table 1: Sequential multi-agent results on Qwen3-4B with 10 latent reasoning steps and n=100 examples per benchmark. LM denotes uncompressed LatentMAS; SKV-90 denotes boundary-aware SelectKV with a 90% retention ratio applied to the newly communicable KV region while preserving inherited context. Metrics report accuracy (%), generated output tokens, communicated KV positions, logical KV payload (MiB), and inference time (s), each averaged per example. Accuracy is reported with 95% percentile bootstrap confidence intervals in brackets, computed using 10,000 resamples over evaluation examples. Δ reports the accuracy difference in percentage points, relative change for Token, KV Pos., and Payload, and the LM/SKV-90 inference-time ratio. Green shading indicates values favorable to SKV-90.
Tasks
Metrics
Qwen3.5-4B
Qwen3.5-9B
Single
TextMAS
HyLaMAS
Improve
Single
TextMAS
HyLaMAS
Improve
Acc.
100.0
100.0
99.0
↓ 1.0
100.0
98.0
99.0
↑ 1.0
Token
361
1138
361
↓ 68.3%
386
1350
356
↓ 73.6%
ARC-E
Time (s)
464
1294
846
× 1.53
426
1269
618
× 2.05
Acc.
94.0
92.0
91.0
↓ 1.0
94.0
95.0
93.0
↓ 2.0
Token
436
1297
481
↓ 62.9%
465
1524
430
↓ 71.8%
Table 2: Sequential multi-agent results on Qwen3.5-4B and Qwen3.5-9B (Gated DeltaNet layers interleaved with periodic full-attention layers), n=100 problems per benchmark. Single : one-agent inference, shown for context. TextMAS : agents exchange natural-language messages. HyLaMAS : agents exchange the KV cache of full-attention layers and the recurrent and causal-convolution states of Gated DeltaNet layers via the shared workspace. Metrics are accuracy (%), output tokens per problem, and total inference time (s); lower is better for the latter two. Improve is HyLaMAS vs. TextMAS: accuracy in absolute points, token reduction (%), speed-up (TextMAS time / HyLaMAS time). Shaded Improve cells mark a change in the favorable direction.
Method
GSM8K
ARC-E
ARC-C
MedQA
MBPP+
HumanEval+
Accuracy (%) ↑
Single
73
96
87
61
42
50
TextMAS
67
91
81
61
49
52
HyLaMAS
80
94
81
63
49
58
Improve
+13
+3
+0
+2
+0
+6
Tokens / sample ↓
Table 3: Latent collaboration at small scale (Qwen3.5-2B), n=100 per benchmark. Single is one-agent inference (context), TextMAS passes natural-language messages, HyLaMAS passes hybrid state. Improve is HyLaMAS vs. TextMAS (accuracy in points, tokens as % reduction, speed as speed-up); shaded where it favors HyLaMAS.
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 1: Boundary-protection ablation for SelectKV on MedQA. Removing protection permits greater compression but produces a larger observed accuracy loss. Boundary-aware SelectKV remains one accuracy point below full-cache LatentMAS while reducing communicated KV payload.
Figure 2: Matched-budget SelectKV selector ablation on MedQA. SelectKV outperforms random and recency-only selection at the same retained-KV budget, indicating that its selection criterion contributes beyond compression alone. The selector ablation was conducted as a separate experimental run from the main SelectKV evaluation in Table 1 .
Figure 3: Hybrid-state channel ablation for HyLaMAS on MedQA. Both retains full-attention KV and the complete GDN state, including recurrent and causal-convolution states; KV only removes GDN state; State only removes KV; and None removes both. The left panel reports accuracy with approximate 95% binomial confidence intervals. The right panel reports mean decoded tokens per completed problem and reports the logical state payload shared across agent boundaries in MiB.
SelectKV
HyLaMAS
Model
Qwen3-4B
Qwen3.5-{2B, 4B, 9B}
Architecture
dense attention, 36 layers
GDN : attention 3:1
Weights
bfloat16
bfloat16
Attention backend
—
sdpa
GPU
NVIDIA L40S (46,068 MiB)
A100-SXM4-40GB (2B/4B); L40S (9B)
PyTorch / CUDA
2.13.0 / 13.0; 2.8.0 / 12.9
2.13.0 / 13.0 (2B/4B); 2.8.0 / 12.9 (9B)
Appendix
Table 4: Experimental configurations for SelectKV and HyLaMAS. Runtime comparisons use matched model, benchmark, hardware, and batch-size settings.
Multi-agent communication studies how autonomous agents exchange information to coordinate decisions, share knowledge, and act together under constraints.
LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) increasingly use latent collaboration to avoid the information loss and repeated encoding-decoding overhead of natural-language communication. However, directly forwarding all sender latents makes the receiver-side context scale with both the number of agents and the reasoning length, increasing computation, memory usage, and collaboration latency. A natural solution is latent compression. But we find that cross-agent redundancy remains unresolved in existing latent compression approaches, which typically compress each sender independently and then concatenate the results. We propose LatCom, a cross-agent latent compression framework for efficient multi-agent latent collaboration. LatCom maps multiple sender latents into a fixed number of receiver-readable and task-relevant slots. Rather than reconstructing all sender hidden states, it optimizes the compressed latents for receiver-side task utility. LatCom trains the compressor in two stages: single-sender readability learning first establishes a latent interface interpretable by the frozen receiver, and multi-sender fusion learning then trains the compressor to fuse complementary evidence and remove redundancy across agents. Experiments on multiple benchmarks with Qwen3-4B show that LatCom achieves an average 2.46x inference speed-up over LatentMAS and reduces output token usage by 70.3% while maintaining comparable average accuracy.
Shinan Zhang, Tao Zhang, Qihui Zhu +7
University of Science and Technology of China · Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center
Communication protocol design is a central challenge in large language model-based multi-agent systems. Existing single-channel approaches face an inherent communication trilemma: text-based methods are interpretable but verbose, while latent-space methods are efficient but opaque and limited to unidirectional workflows. Inspired by multi-channel communication theory, we propose HyLaT, a hybrid latent-text communication protocol that transmits elaborate cognitive signals through a latent channel for efficiency, while expressing concise critical signals in natural language to preserve interpretability and precision. We introduce a two-stage training framework combining single-agent hybrid generation learning and multi-agent interactive co-training, enabling agents to generate and interpret hybrid messages across multiple rounds of interaction. Experiments demonstrate that HyLaT reduces communication overhead significantly while maintaining competitive task performance, with strong generalization and robustness across diverse settings.
Xinyi Mou, Siyuan Wang, Zejun Li +2
Fudan University · The Chinese University of Hong Kong · King’s College London +2
Large language model-based multi-agent systems improve complex problem solving through collaboration, while latent communication directly transmits model internal states to avoid the high inference costs of natural language. However, existing KV-based latent communication methods prioritize sender-side state fidelity, leading to substantial communication and computation overhead and potentially introducing redundant information. To address these limitations, we revisit latent communication from a task-oriented perspective, shifting its objective from sender-side state fidelity to receiver-side task sufficiency. Under this formulation, we propose KITE, a training-free framework for task-oriented key-layer KV communication. KITE identifies a task-effective key layer using a receiver trajectory distortion criterion, transmits only the latent working memory associated with the key layer, and further uses the same layer as the entry point for autoregressive latent reasoning. Experiments on seven benchmarks across two model families and three model scales show that, compared with full-layer KV communication, KITE reduces communication volume by 28-36×, achieves up to 3× end-to-end inference speedup, and improves accuracy by up to 23.3 percentage points.
Dongsen Zhang, Peipei Li, Zekun Li +1
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · University of California, Santa Barbara