cs.SEOct 28, 2026

The Reality Gap in Automated Driving Systems Testing: Landscape, Challenges, and Research Directions

Authors: Stefano Carlo Lambertenghi, Oliver Weissl, Johannes Betz, Andrea Stocco

Organizations: Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 3, Garching, Bavaria, Germany, 85748 · fortiss GmbH, Boltzmannstraße 3, Garching, Bavaria, Germany, 85748 · NorCom GmbH & Co. KGaA, Boltzmannstraße 3, Garching, Bavaria, Germany, 85748 · Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, Garching, Bavaria, Germany, 85748

Abstract

Simulation is essential for testing automated driving systems (ADS), but discrepancies between simulation and reality can undermine testing conclusions. It remains unclear which discrepancies the literature addresses and what evidence supports correspondence claims. We present a systematic mapping of 235 primary studies that measure or mitigate the reality gap in ADS testing, selected from 4,195 publications. We characterise objectives, targets, approaches, experimental setups, and evaluation evidence. Our classification distinguishes simulated and real-world execution across six ADS test components, separately for each approach and its evaluation reference. This distinguishes real-world information used to construct an approach from evidence used to evaluate its claims. Of the included studies, 76% address mitigation, primarily targeting scenario and actor realism and perception, while 94% report validation or measurement procedures. Only 61 studies report metrics from multiple families covering sensor/perception correspondence, ADS behaviour, vehicle dynamics, or safety outcomes; this coverage does not establish causal links between discrepancies and test verdicts. The synthesis highlights that real-world content and physical execution must be interpreted against the claim evaluated. The findings motivate claim-specific evaluation and component-level reporting to establish which discrepancies affect testing conclusions and when simulation evidence supports conclusions about real-world ADS behaviour.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems

    Jul 6, 2026Stefano Carlo Lambertenghi, Matthias Weil, Andrea StoccoAutonomous Driving Safety EvaluationAdversarial Robustness

  2. Virtual Testing of Automated Driving Systems through Credible Simulations

    Sep 3, 2026Riccardo Dona, Espedito Rusciano, Biagio CiuffoAutonomous Driving Safety EvaluationAutonomous Driving

  3. Simulator Ensembles for Trustworthy Autonomous Driving Systems Testing

    Mar 11, 2025Lev Sorokin, Matteo Biagiola, Andrea StoccoAutomated Software TestingAutonomous Driving Simulation