LINDA: Low Resource Foot Ulcer Segmentation using Local Similarity and Iterative Neural Dynamics

Accurate semantic segmentation of foot ulcers is essential for automated wound monitoring, yet boundary delineation remains challenging due to tissue heterogeneity and poor contrast with surrounding skin. To overcome the limitations of standard intensity-based networks, we present LSS-LTCNet:an ante-hoc explainable framework synergizing deterministic structural priors with continuous-time neural dynamics. Our architecture departs from traditional black-box models by employing a Local Self-Similarity (LSS) mechanism that extracts dense, illumination-invariant texture descriptors to explicitly disentangle necrotic tissue from background artifacts. To enforce topological precision, we introduce a Liquid Time-Constant (LTC) refinement module that treats boundary evolution as an ODEgoverned dynamic system, iteratively refining masks over continuous time-steps. Comprehensive evaluation on the MICCAI FUSeg dataset demonstrates that LSS-LTCNet achieves state-of-the-art boundary alignment, securing a peak Dice score of 86.96% and an exceptional 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) of 8.91 pixels. Requiring merely 25.70M parameters, the model significantly outperforms heavier U-Net and transformer baselines in efficiency. By providing inherent visual audit trails alongside high-fidelity predictions, LSS-LTCNet offers a robust and transparent solution for computer-aided diagnosis in mobile healthcare (mHealth) settings.

Deep learning models for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) segmentation routinely report high accuracy, but they are almost always trained and tested on the same dataset, leaving their behaviour on data from a different clinical source largely unmeasured. We benchmark three representative segmentation architectures -- U-Net and DeepLabV3+ (convolutional) and SegFormer-B2 (Transformer) -- under an identical, leakage-screened protocol: training on the combined FUSeg/AZH wound data and evaluating, without fine-tuning, on two independent external datasets (DFUC2022 and Medetec). All models achieve strong in-domain performance (Dice 0.80--0.83) but degrade substantially across datasets. The degradation is, however, architecture-dependent: SegFormer-B2 generalizes best on both external sets (DFUC2022 Dice 0.557, Medetec Dice 0.786), outperforming both convolutional models, while the more complex DeepLabV3+ generalizes worse than the simpler U-Net. Per-image failure analysis on 2,160 images across both external test sets confirms that SegFormer-B2 produces the fewest catastrophic failures on DFUC2022 (31.1%), compared with U-Net (38.5%) and DeepLabV3+ (43.0%). The consistent ranking across two independent external sources, confirmed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (p < 0.001 on both datasets), indicates that architecture family, not model complexity, drives cross-hospital generalization.

Accurate wound classification (WC) and boundary segmentation are essential for guiding clinical decisions in chronic and acute wound management. However, most existing artificial intelligence (AI) models are limited, focusing on a narrow set of wound types, limited variations in wound severity, or a single task (segmentation or classification), which reduces their clinical applicability. This study presents two dedicated instance segmentation models based on You Only Look Once (YOLO)v11 that perform wound boundary segmentation (WBS) and WC across five clinically relevant wound types: burn injury (BI), pressure injury, diabetic foot ulcer, vascular ulcer, and surgical wound. A wound-type balanced dataset of 2,963 annotated images was created to train the models for both tasks, using five-fold cross-validation. Models trained on the original, non-augmented dataset performed consistently across folds, though BI detection accuracy was relatively low; augmenting the dataset with rotation, flipping, and variations in brightness, saturation, and exposure significantly improved performance, particularly for visually subtle BI cases. Among the tested variants, YOLOv11x achieved the best WBS performance (F1-score: 0.9341; mAP50: 0.9629). For WC, YOLOv11m achieved the highest mAP50 (0.9194) and mAP50-95 (0.6950), whereas YOLOv11l achieved the highest F1-score (0.8797). The lightweight YOLOv11n provided comparable accuracy at lower computational cost, making it suitable for resource-constrained deployments. Supported by confusion matrices and visual detection outputs, the results confirm robustness against complex backgrounds and high intra-class variability, demonstrating the potential of YOLOv11-based architectures for accurate, real-time wound analysis in clinical and remote care settings.