Organizations: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · Huawei Inc. · Guangdong Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy (SZ)
As agents become more capable, they are moving beyond one-off tasks toward sustained assistance across successive user goals. Such assistance requires agents to discover how unfamiliar environments work, reuse what they learn across tasks, and keep that experience current as environments evolve. Existing benchmarks increasingly study experience reuse and adaptation, but provide limited insight into which parts of accumulated experience agents revise, retain, or lose. To address this gap, we introduce ReScopeBench, a benchmark for the experience lifecycle across 18 interactive environments. It distinguishes structural experience about how an environment is organized and accessed from rule experience about reusable principles and constraints that guide decisions across tasks. To study how experience is acquired, reused, and revised, we propose an experience-first construction approach. It builds task streams around shared experience and introduces silent environmental changes. We evaluate task performance and track changes in saved experience throughout each stream. Across 20 models, we find that retained experience improves task performance, but agents struggle to keep it current as environments change. Even when the required experience is correctly recorded, agents do not always complete tasks successfully. These findings identify selective maintenance and effective use as complementary challenges for long-lived agents.
Figures & tables
Experience
Environmental Change
Assessment
Benchmark
Acquisition
Reuse
Budgeted Exploration
Silent
Multiple
Revision & Retention
LoCoMo ( Maharana et al., 2024 )
Provided
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
LongMemEval ( Wu et al., 2025 )
Provided
✗
✗
✓
✗
✗
MemBench ( Tan et al., 2025 )
Provided
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
MAB ( Hu et al., 2025 )
Provided
✓
✗
✓
✓
✗
LAB ( Zheng et al., 2025 )
Interactive
✓
✗
✗
✗
✗
Table 1: Comparison of benchmarks for agent memory and experience. MAB and LAB denote MemoryAgentBench and LifelongAgentBench, respectively.
Figure 1: ReScopeBench overview. (a) Experience-first construction connects executable environments, discoverable dependencies, and verified task streams. (b) Agents acquire, reuse, and selectively revise experience after silent changes.
Figure 2: Distribution of change type and environment domain.
Provider
Model
Performance
Experience
Avg.
BP
EP
DP
SC
RC
UC
RT
Compact Open-Weight Models
Alibaba
Qwen3.5-9B
0.51
0.89
0.74
15.14
18.43
1.67
2.95
5.76
Alibaba
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
0.82
2.75
0.89
18.19
18.21
0.40
4.18
6.49
Alibaba
Qwen3.8-27B
20.07
62.48
38.21
60.90
55.18
29.05
59.17
46.44
Commercial Models
Table 2: Main results on ReScopeBench. BP: baseline performance; EP: experience-enabled performance; DP: drift-onset performance; SC: structural coverage; RC: rule coverage; UC: update coverage; RT: recovery timeliness. Bold and underlined values denote the best and second-best distinct scores in each column, respectively; ties receive the same formatting.
Figure 3: Task performance (top) and experience coverage (bottom) across task streams. Dark-gray curves average all 20 models, and markers distinguish four representative models. Bottom ticks show change positions, while vertical lines mark changes shared by all environments in a group.
Figure 4: Adaptation to environmental change: (a) timing and change count, (b) performance advantage by change mechanism, and (c) revision and retention of previously correct experience.
Figure 5: Tool use across 18 environments: (a) call allocation, (b) interaction rounds, and (c) experience write attempts around change. Representative models match Figure 3 . The overall mean includes all 20 models.
Appendix figures & tables13 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Environment
Te
Tools
Task goal
API Reliability
16
5
Restore failed provider requests to durable accepted results without duplicate effects.
Backup and Recovery
16
14
Create active asset-protection assignments with daily schedules, activated policies, and site-compatible repositories.
Carbon Credits
32
7
Complete carbon-credit retirements using currently eligible holdings and required audit evidence.
Cinema Booking
24
9
Complete paid bookings satisfying the requested film, venue, showtime, ticket type, and seat zone, using eligible pricing and available seats.
Cloud Data Warehouse
24
5
Commit governed query deliveries with materialized tables, completed exports, valid lane authorities, and applicable approved controls.
Course Registration
16
15
Create active student registrations in the requested sections and processing lanes under the applicable policy.
Appendix
Table 3: Task goals, stream lengths ( Te ), and tool counts across 18 environments.
Environment
Task
Mechanism
Implemented change
API Reliability
9
Rule
Revise recovery profiles for four operation-specific cases: queued replays, provider errors, timeouts, and rate limits. Retain the retry action.
Backup and Recovery
5
Rule
Replace protection-route and repository-profile requirements for critical/restricted, standard/confidential, archive/internal, and regulated/public service-tier/data-class pairs.
Carbon Credits
9
Rule
Revise project eligibility and claim protocols for Gold Standard customer allocations and national voluntary claims. Retain holdings.
Carbon Credits
17
Rule
Revise an allocation policy and again amend the national voluntary-claim policy. Retain the earlier Gold Standard allocation rule.
Carbon Credits
25
Rule
Revise Gold Standard allocation and national voluntary-claim policies with new protocols. Retain the allocation rule changed at task 17.
Cinema Booking
9
Resource
Cancel showtimes in three screening groups and open replacements. Transfer screening-specific pricing assignments without changing fare terms.
Appendix
Table 4: All 26 scheduled changes. Task denotes the first affected task position.
Figure 6: Agreement between GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol experience scores across 360 model–environment pairs per panel. The dashed line denotes equal scores.
Figure 7: Task performance in all 18 environments. Solid and dashed curves show performance with and without experience. Vertical lines mark changes.
Figure 8: Post-task experience coverage in all 18 environments. Solid and dashed curves show structural and rule coverage. Vertical lines mark changes.
Figure 9: Delivery by prior-content completeness within matched tasks. Lines connect each model’s two rates, and diamonds mark equal-model means.
Outcome
Complete prior
Incomplete prior
No linked submission
3.67
23.09
Submitted, never compatible
0.63
5.21
Compatible, not delivered
0.40
0.42
Delivered
95.31
71.28
Appendix
Table 5: Task-matched request outcome rates (%) by completeness of prior experience.
Figure 10: Prior-coverage correlations with current performance over 6,160 same-version observations. (a) Equal-environment means under successive adjustments. (b) Fully adjusted per-environment coefficients.
Revised-content state
T07
T08
T09
T10
Currently credited
13
59
91
92
Exposed, never credited
8
9
11
12
Exposed, previously credited but now uncredited
0
0
6
14
No mapped read
101
54
14
4
Appendix
Table 6: Replacement evidence and saved-content states in Filesystem. Each column partitions the same 122 model–relation pairs.
Figure 11: Update persistence and read categories. (a) Completion and two-task follow-up for 2,340 affected model/unit/event observations. (b) Evidence from 2,160 environment queries in Filesystem and Oracle. Bars show within-panel proportions.
Figure 12: First-submission paths and information gathering in Filesystem and Oracle.
Figure 13: Local revision and subsequent reuse in Filesystem. Selected complete records link the revised binding to experience judgments and delivery checks.
Figure 14: Complete saved experience, resource use, and delivery on the same Oracle Clinical One task. Selected entries are reproduced in full.
Lifelong LLM agents increasingly adapt through external learning states that store past interactions as retrievable memories or reusable skills, yet existing benchmarks rarely account for how the path of accumulated experience shapes what agents transfer and retain. In this work, we establish PATH-Bench, a benchmark for path-dependent evaluation of lifelong agents. PATH-Bench estimates directed task relationships via multi-model in-context learning, constructs probe-centered sequences with controlled helpful and interfering histories, and repeatedly evaluates probe tasks to measure average performance, forward transfer, backward transfer, and forgetting. We evaluate eight representative agents on single-turn code generation and multi-turn tool-use tasks under positive- and negative-dominant histories. Benchmark results show that experience utility depends jointly on how experience is represented and on the task's interaction structure, that strong transfer does not ensure retention, and that later experience can reshape gains acquired earlier in the learning path. Based on these findings, we propose Selective Experience Use (SEU), an agent harness that regulates how path-accumulated experience influences each new task, admitting helpful items while filtering out potential interference. SEU consistently reduces forgetting while improving forward transfer in the majority of settings. The PATH-Bench provides both a controlled evaluation framework and actionable guidance for designing more selective and robust lifelong agents.
Xidong Yang, Xingyi Zhang, Wenhao Li +7
East China Normal University · Tongji University · Ant Group +5
Large language model agents are expected to continuously adapt to new tasks and environments over their lifetime by reusing past experience. However, existing memory-based agents struggle to transfer reusable experience across environments and suffer from catastrophic forgetting as experience accumulated. To address these challenges, we propose LifeMem, a lifelong learning framework that enables agents to transfer knowledge across multiple environments. During learning, LifeMem clusters accumulated interaction trajectories based on underlying workflows to extract reusable skills. When solving a new task at inference time, the agent recalls relevant skills and trajectories to guide actions. To validate our method, we conduct experiments across 10 environments and over 13k tasks with 2k newly annotated interaction trajectories. Results show that LifeMem enables effective experience reuse in lifelong learning, achieving both reduced forgetting on learned tasks and superior cross-task transfer. Further analysis reveals that task streaming impacts learning, while consolidating structurally similar trajectories within memory boosts performance.
Yuli Qiu, Yutong Li, Wei Su +5
School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology · School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University · Research Center for Social Computing and Interactive Robotics, Harbin Institute of Technology +1
As large language model (LLM) agents become widely adopted, they are increasingly deployed for tasks that require persistent monitoring or recurring actions (e.g., market analysis). These agents are expected to operate unattended for days or weeks, act at the right timing, and adapt to the dynamic environment over time. These challenges are not fully captured in the existing long-horizon agent work, as they often consider a static environment that is not temporally changing. We introduce ReLiveGym, a diagnostic evaluation environment of long-lived tasks in which agents act sparsely over simulated weeks of chronologically replayed real-world news, market, and social-media streams. The tasks span diverse levels of time sensitivity, reasoning intensity, and recurrence. Across eight base language models, we investigate how model choice and harness design affect agent performance on such long-lived tasks. Our results show that how agents determine when to act arises as an important harness-design axis for long-lived tasks; and that the optimal design varies across tasks and sometimes model choices as well. We also evaluate how continuous learning from hindsight feedback affects performance and addresses failure modes observed in these long-lived tasks. These findings indicate model choice, action timing mechanism, and use of feedback as important considerations in the design of long-lived agents. Code: https://github.com/SaharaLabsAI/ReLiveGym