MammoSeek: A Mammography Agent with selective zooming for grounded reports

Screening mammography is high volume, time sensitive, and documentation heavy. Radiologists must translate subtle visual findings into consistent BI-RADS assessments, breast density categories, and structured narrative reports. While recent Vision Language Models (VLMs) enable image-to-text reporting, many rely on closed cloud systems or tightly coupled architectures that limit privacy, reproducibility, and adaptability. We present MammoWise, a local multi-model pipeline that transforms open source VLMs into mammogram report generators and multi-task classifiers. MammoWise supports any Ollama-hosted VLM and mammography dataset, and enables zero-shot, few-shot, and Chain-of-Thought prompting, with optional multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) using a vector database for case-specific context. We evaluate MedGemma, LLaVA-Med, and Qwen2.5-VL on VinDr-Mammo and DMID datasets, assessing report quality (BERTScore, ROUGE-L), BI-RADS classification, breast density, and key findings. Report generation is consistently strong and improves with few-shot prompting and RAG. Classification is feasible but sensitive to model and dataset choice. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (QLoRA) of MedGemma improves reliability, achieving BI-RADS accuracy of 0.7545, density accuracy of 0.8840, and calcification accuracy of 0.9341 while preserving report quality. MammoWise provides a practical and extensible framework for deploying local VLMs for mammography reporting within a unified and reproducible workflow.

Purpose: To compare four multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with radiologists of varying expertise in breast density assessment, BI-RADS assessment, biopsy candidacy determination, and continuous malignancy probability estimation using digital mammography (DM) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Methods: This study included 179 women with paired DM/CEM examinations and reference standards. Four MLLMs (ChatGPT-5.2, Gemini-3.1 Pro, Sonnet-4.6, Muse Spark) interpreted images with and without masks; three radiologists interpreted non-masked images. Results: For binary density classification on DM, radiologist accuracies ranged from 55.81% to 78.60%, exceeding most MLLM values (62.33%-71.63%), while masks added limited benefit. Five-category BI-RADS accuracies were higher for radiologists on DM (56.74-67.44%) and CEM (62.33-82.79%) compared with MLLMs (DM 31.16-45.12%; CEM 40.00-55.81%). Binary biopsy-candidacy accuracies were likewise higher for radiologists (DM 85.12-89.77%; CEM 86.98-92.09%) than for MLLMs (DM 61.39-75.35%; CEM 69.30-82.79%), although CEM improved performance across all readers. Lesion masks substantially improved MLLM continuous malignancy-probability accuracies from 64.65%-71.63% to 72.56-78.60% on DM and from 67.91%-77.21% to 72.56%-81.86% on CEM, approaching radiologist ranges (DM 63.72-82.79%; CEM 81.86-88.84%). The corresponding AUCs for the top masked models overlapped those of the human readers. Overall, Muse Spark, followed by Sonnet-4.6, demonstrated the strongest performance among the MLLMs across domains. Conclusion: Radiologists generally outperformed MLLMs in categorical tasks, while selected masked models approached human performance for continuous malignancy probability estimation, suggesting a potential adjunctive role.

Breast cancer is a major global health concern, and mammography screening plays a central role in early detection. The large volume of screening examinations creates a substantial workload for radiologists, making accurate and consistent report generation a critical clinical challenge. Existing automated mammography report generation methods primarily focus on direct visual-to-text mapping, while overlooking the structured clinical reasoning process followed by radiologists in real-world practice. To address this limitation, we propose MammoRG, a mammography report generation framework that explicitly simulates the clinical reporting workflow by following the BI-RADS guideline and incorporating prior clinical knowledge to produce diagnostic reports. Specifically, MammoRG adopts a two-stage training framework. In the first stage, the model learns to integrate clinically relevant prior knowledge from a patient's four-view mammograms through classification-based supervision. In the second stage, a terminology-aware supervised fine-tuning strategy is introduced to model mammography-specific clinical terms as atomic semantic units, enabling the generation of high-quality reports with improved clinical consistency. To facilitate clinical efficacy evaluation of generated reports, we further develop MammoRGTool, a dedicated mammography report parsing tool that extracts structured clinical information from free-text reports. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MammoRG consistently outperforms existing methods across multiple clinical efficacy metrics, particularly in diagnosis-related BI-RADS F1, where it surpasses the second-best model by 2.73%, 2.04%, 1.90%, and 3.27% on the internal, external 1, external 2, and VinDr-Mammo datasets, respectively.