Edge-Assisted Crowdsensing for Explainable Cyclist Safety Perception

Cycling delivers significant public-health and environmental benefits, yet its uptake in cities is often limited by perceived safety. When street environments appear unsafe, individuals are less likely to cycle, making perception a key barrier to adoption. Recent work has shown that pairwise comparisons of street-view images provide a scalable way to learn subjective safety judgments. However, existing approaches do not explicitly model human visual attention, which plays a central role in how humans perceive safety. We propose an Eye-Tracking-Guided Perceived Cycling Safety framework (EG-PCS) that integrates gaze data into a pairwise learning pipeline based on vision transformers. By supervising the model's attention mechanism with eye-tracking signals, we encourage alignment between learned attention maps and human fixation patterns. Experiments show that gaze-guided models achieve similar ranking performance compared to state-of-the-art approaches while producing attention maps that more accurately reflect human visual attention behavior. Our results demonstrate that incorporating eye-tracking information enhances both predictive accuracy and interpretability in perception-based urban analytics.

This paper presents an explainable approach to pedestrian routing, in which perceived safety is estimated from street-level imagery through an explicit natural-language intermediate representation. A vision--language model caption is generated and stored before any scoring is undertaken, and the perceived-risk class is derived entirely from structured features of that stored text, so that every segment score remains inspectable by the user. Nine captioning conditions across five model families are benchmarked against a direct Contrastive Language--Image Pre-training (CLIP) image-embedding baseline under an identical downstream pipeline, and the caption-mediated representation is found to reach parity with the image embedding rather than to trail it. The approach was deployed over 654,115 images covering 36 electoral wards in two locations in Northern England (Manchester and Huddersfield). Independent field validation against 3,669 locally collected ratings of 494 images across 70 participant sessions established agreement that is statistically significant but modest, at $r=0.262$, against a measured noise ceiling of 0.737 imposed by disagreement between raters. A single-use confirmatory test then found that a pipeline 44% stronger on the supervised benchmark did not produce measurable improvement in the field ($r=0.250$, $p=0.84$), so the benchmark gains did not predict the deployment gains in this case. Routing behaviour varies systematically with journey length. There is negligible change below 1,km, reaching a median increase of 12.78% in low-risk route length for a median detour of 2.73% on journeys of 3 to 6 km.

The vulnerability of cyclists, exacerbated by the rising popularity of faster e-bikes, motivates adapting automotive perception technologies for bicycle safety. We use our multi-sensor SenseBike research platform to study 3D LiDAR semantic segmentation for bicycles. We introduce the novel BikeScenes-lidarseg Dataset, comprising 3021 consecutive LiDAR scans around the university campus of the TU Delft, semantically annotated for 29 dynamic and static classes. As an initial baseline study, we evaluate how a SemanticKITTI pre-trained FRNet model transfers to this bicycle-mounted solid-state LiDAR setting. Fine-tuning on BikeScenes increases mean Intersection-over-Union (mIoU) from 13.8% to 63.6% on our held-out subsequences. These results show the practical value of in-domain data for this platform, while also highlighting the need for larger bicycle datasets. We contribute BikeScenes as a resource for advancing research in cyclist-centric perception.