BikeScenes: LiDAR Semantic Segmentation for Bicycles

Reliable 3D perception of vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as cyclists and pedestrians is essential for their safety in urban traffic and a core requirement for autonomous driving (AD). Alongside advances in vehicle-based perception, research increasingly equips bicycles with sensors to study traffic from a perspective native to VRUs. Such platforms still rely on LiDAR detectors originally trained on vehicle data, yet annotated 3D data from a cyclist's perspective is scarce. How well these detectors generalise to this setting has not been evaluated. We present a 3D object detection benchmark of 1,027 annotated LiDAR keyframes (over 18,000 3D bounding boxes) from the FUSE-Bike platform in urban Munich. We evaluate four nuScenes-pre-trained detectors against 1,854 human-verified ground-truth (GT) boxes both in their original form and after finetuning on training labels produced by a VRU-dedicated auto-labelling pipeline that requires no manual annotation. The zero-shot domain gap is concentrated on the VRU classes. Finetuning recovers most of it, improving mean average precision (mAP) by up to 23.4 points with the largest gains on pedestrians and cyclists, and the adapted detectors even surpass the quality of the auto-labels they were trained on. The benchmark provides a reproducible baseline for VRU-centric 3D detection and shows that auto-labels are a viable substitute for manual annotation when adapting vehicle-trained detectors to a cyclist platform.

Autonomous driving perception is typically evaluated on clean benchmark data, yet real-world deployment requires robustness to rare, structured, and potentially adversarial sensor anomalies. This gap is especially critical for LiDAR, where external actors can physically manipulate the sensing process to induce black-box perception failures without accessing the model. Existing LiDAR benchmarks provide little visibility into this failure mode. Prior adversarial LiDAR studies have largely centered on attack hardware, geometric and algorithmic defenses, and early-generation detectors, leaving the robustness of modern perception systems unexplored. To address this evaluation gap, we introduce ATLAS (Adversarial Temporal LiDAR Attack Suite), the first large-scale, physically grounded evaluation benchmark for LiDAR perception models under black-box sensor attacks, simulating the two primary attack modes -- point injection and point removal -- across real driving sequences. Evaluating a broad cross-section of current state-of-the-art LiDAR perception models, ATLAS reveals a surprising robustness asymmetry: models with stronger performance on standard benchmarks tend to better withstand removal attacks, yet are actually more vulnerable to injection attacks than weaker models. We trace this vulnerability to standard object database sampling augmentations, revealing how current training practices can induce architecture-agnostic robustness failures, and study initial directions for mitigating both attack modes. We release the ATLAS generation code to support extensible, reproducible evaluations as attack capabilities evolve, helping make black-box sensor robustness an explicit consideration in future LiDAR perception development.

LiDAR has increasingly been integrated into traffic cameras to expand coverage and mitigate occlusion in roadside cooperative perception. However, how unimodal and camera-LiDAR fusion architectures behave under variations in LiDAR point sparsity induced by sensor configurations and scene-dependent sensing conditions remains underexplored. We introduce RESOLVE, a large-scale real-world benchmark dataset featuring multi-resolution roadside LiDAR and synchronized camera-LiDAR sensing for systematic evaluation of unimodal and fusion-based architectures in roadside 3D detection and tracking. RESOLVE contains over 100k images and 26k point cloud frames with 220k manually annotated bounding boxes, captured at a real-world urban intersection across diverse lighting and weather conditions and spanning 10 classes of traffic participants. In particular, RESOLVE enables controlled evaluation across three LiDAR resolution levels while keeping all other sensing and environmental factors fixed. This allows fair cross-architecture comparisons under point cloud distribution shifts resulting from resolution variations, sensing distance, and training-inference resolution mismatches. Results from extensive benchmark experiments reveal insights into how multimodal fusion can compensate for LiDAR point sparsity, offering clues for designing cost-efficient roadside multimodal perception. The dataset and benchmark codes are available at https://github.com/ASU-Suo-Lab/RESOLVE.