Overview

Annotator disagreement research examines how judgments vary across people and items, and whether variation comes from ambiguity, task difficulty, annotator perspectives, or annotation conditions. Common approaches include agreement metrics, statistical and Bayesian models of annotators, demographic or perspective-aware models, and training on soft label distributions rather than majority votes. The work matters for subjective tasks such as emotion recognition, content moderation, and medical assessment, where a single gold label can hide uncertainty and distort model calibration or benchmark rankings. A central tension is deciding when to preserve disagreement as meaningful variation and when to resolve it through clearer definitions or adjudication, especially when annotation budgets are limited.

Latest papers

CardsList

91 papers13 papers in the last four weeks, up 63% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

  1. STABLEVAL: Disagreement-Aware and Stable Evaluation of AI Systems

    May 4, 2026Akash Bonagiri, Gerard Janno Anderias, Saee Patil +6Annotator DisagreementAI Agent Evaluation

  2. Quantifying and Predicting Disagreement in Graded Human Ratings

    May 1, 2026Leixin Zhang, Çağrı ÇöltekinAnnotator Disagreement

  3. Are You the A-hole? A Fair, Multi-Perspective Ethical Reasoning Framework

    Apr 30, 2026Sheza Munir, Ahanaf Rodoshi, Sumin Lee +3Annotator DisagreementNeuro-Symbolic Reasoning

  4. LLMs Capture Emotion Labels, Not Emotion Uncertainty: Distributional Analysis and Calibration of Human-LLM Judgment Gaps

    Apr 30, 2026Keito Inoshita, Xiaokang Zhou, Akira Kawai +1LLM EvaluationAnnotator Disagreement

  5. Aggregate vs. Personalized Judges in Business Idea Evaluation: Evidence from Expert Disagreement

    Apr 24, 2026Wataru Hirota, Tomoki Taniguchi, Tomoko Ohkuma +6Human Preference EvaluationAnnotator Disagreement

  6. Fine-Grained Perspectives: Modeling Explanations with Annotator-Specific Rationales

    Apr 23, 2026Olufunke O. Sarumi, Charles Welch, Daniel BraunAnnotator DisagreementNatural Language Inference

  7. Who Watches the Watchmen? Humans Disagree With Translation Metrics on Unseen Domains

    Apr 19, 2026Finn Schmidt, Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas +1Annotator DisagreementAutomated Evaluation

  8. Beyond Black-Box Labels: Interpretable Criteria for Diagnosing Subjective NLP Tasks

    Apr 18, 2026Nisrine Rair, Alban Goupil, Valeriu Vrabie +1Annotator Disagreement

  9. IYKYK (But AI Doesn't): Automated Content Moderation Does Not Capture Communities' Heterogeneous Attitudes Towards Reclaimed Language

    Apr 17, 2026Christina Chance, Rebecca Pattichis, Arjun Subramonian +4Social Media AnalysisAnnotator Disagreement

  10. Learning Who Disagrees: Demographic Importance Weighting for Modeling Annotator Distributions with DiADEM

    Apr 9, 2026Samay U. Shetty, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Deepak Pandita +1Annotator DisagreementLabel Distribution Learning

  11. From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labeling

    Apr 8, 2026Robert Chew, Stephanie Eckman, Christoph Kern +1Annotator DisagreementHuman-in-the-Loop Annotation

  12. Beyond the Mean: Modelling Annotation Distributions in Continuous Affect Prediction

    Apr 8, 2026Kosmas Pinitas, Ilias MaglogiannisAffective ComputingAnnotator Disagreement

  13. When AI Agents Disagree Like Humans: Reasoning Trace Analysis for Human-AI Collaborative Moderation

    Apr 4, 2026Michał Wawer, Jarosław A. ChudziakHuman-AI Decision MakingAnnotator Disagreement

  14. Evaluating Interactive 2D Visualization as a Sample Selection Strategy for Biomedical Time-Series Data Annotation

    Mar 27, 2026Einari Vaaras, Manu Airaksinen, Okko RäsänenHuman-in-the-Loop AnnotationActive Learning

  15. Where Experts Disagree, Models Fail: Detecting Implicit Legal Citations in French Court Decisions

    Mar 24, 2026Avrile Floro, Tamara Dhorasoo, Soline Pellez +1Annotator DisagreementLegal Citation Verification

  16. Confidence Calibration under Ambiguous Ground Truth

    Mar 24, 2026Linwei Tao, Haoyang Luo, Minjing Dong +1Post-Hoc CalibrationAnnotator Disagreement

  17. Multi-Perspective LLM Annotations for Valid Analyses in Subjective Tasks

    Mar 22, 2026Navya Mehrotra, Adam Visokay, Kristina GligorićAnnotator DisagreementLLM-Assisted Annotation

  18. Deep EM with Hierarchical Latent Label Modelling for Multi-Site Prostate Lesion Segmentation

    Mar 15, 2026Wen Yan, Yipei Wang, Shiqi Huang +5Medical Image SegmentationLearning with Noisy Labels

  19. Counting on Consensus: Selecting the Right Inter-annotator Agreement Metric for NLP Annotation and Evaluation

    Mar 6, 2026Joseph JamesInter-Rater ReliabilityAnnotator Disagreement

  20. From Variance to Invariance: Qualitative Content Analysis for Narrative Graph Annotation

    Mar 2, 2026Junbo Huang, Max Weinig, Ulrich Fritsche +1Annotator DisagreementInter-Rater Reliability

  21. Human Label Variation in Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition

    Feb 26, 2026Frances Yung, Daniil Ignatev, Merel Scholman +2Annotator DisagreementLabel Distribution Learning

  22. CREMD: Crowd-Sourced Emotional Multimodal Dogs Dataset

    Feb 17, 2026Jinho Baek, Houwei Cao, Kate BlackwellEmotion RecognitionMultimodal Emotion Recognition

  23. Labels have Human Values: Value Calibration of Subjective Tasks

    Jan 10, 2026Mohammed Fayiz Parappan, Ricardo HenaoAnnotator DisagreementAI Alignment