Covariate Shift

Recent momentum

-37%

10 papers in the last 28 days · 0.2% of indexed attention

Twelve weeks of publication activity for this topic as it is defined today.

Weekly history

Recent digests

What was published in this topic, kept on the site without email delivery.

Period ending 2026-09-21

4 new papers

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Covariate Shift.

Period ending 2026-09-14

3 new papers

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Covariate Shift.

Period ending 2026-09-07

1 new paper

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Covariate Shift.

122 papers

Latest in Covariate Shift

Jun 26, 2023math.OC

Efficient Cross-Validation for Sparse Linear Regression

Given a high-dimensional covariate matrix and a response vector, ridge-regularized sparse linear regression selects a subset of features that explains the relationship between covariates and the response in an interpretable manner. To choose hyperparameters that control the sparsity level and amount of regularization, practitioners commonly use k-fold cross-validation. However, cross-validation substantially increases the computational cost of sparse regression as it requires solving many mixed-integer optimization problems (MIOs) for each hyperparameter combination. To address this computational burden, we derive computationally tractable relaxations of the k-fold cross-validation loss, facilitating hyperparameter selection while solving 5050--80%80\% fewer MIOs in practice. Our computational results demonstrate, across eleven real-world UCI datasets, that exact MIO-based cross-validation can be competitive with mature software packages such as glmnet and L0Learn.
Ryan Cory-Wright, Andrés Gómez
Sep 5, 2022stat.ME

Learning from a Biased Sample

The empirical risk minimization approach to data-driven decision making requires access to training data drawn under the same conditions as those that will be faced when the decision rule is deployed. However, in a number of settings, we may be concerned that our training sample is biased in the sense that some groups (characterized by either observable or unobservable attributes) may be under- or over-represented relative to the general population; and in this setting empirical risk minimization over the training set may fail to yield rules that perform well at deployment. We propose a model of sampling bias called conditional ΓΓ-biased sampling, where observed covariates can affect the probability of sample selection arbitrarily much but the amount of unexplained variation in the probability of sample selection is bounded by a constant factor. Applying the distributionally robust optimization framework, we propose a method for learning a decision rule that minimizes the worst-case risk incurred under a family of test distributions that can generate the training distribution under ΓΓ-biased sampling. We apply a result of Rockafellar and Uryasev to show that this problem is equivalent to an augmented convex risk minimization problem. We give statistical guarantees for learning a model that is robust to sampling bias via the method of sieves, and propose a deep learning algorithm whose loss function captures our robust learning target. We empirically validate our proposed method in a case study on prediction of mental health scores from health survey data and a case study on ICU length of stay prediction.
Roshni Sahoo, Lihua Lei, Stefan Wager