Dataset Ownership Verification

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

2 papers in the last four weeks, down 33% on the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Jul 6Week of Sep 21

Latest papers 19

Sep 24, 2026cs.CR

TP-CRIV: A Framework for Third-Party Challenge-Response Identity Verification of AI Models

Artificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly deployed through remote services, making model misappropriation a growing concern. Existing approaches, including watermarking, fingerprinting, and model similarity analysis, primarily rely on predefined evidence or direct behavioral comparison and do not explicitly evaluate whether the claimant currently possesses and can utilize model-dependent information relevant to the claimed model identity. In this paper, we propose Third-Party Challenge-Response Identity Verification (TP-CRIV) for AI models. TP-CRIV targets a third-party verification setting in which the verifier has neither white-box nor API access to the claimant's model, can interact with the suspicious deployed service only through its ordinary black-box inference interface, and does not require protocol-specific cooperation from the service provider. Under these constraints, the framework enables the verifier to obtain empirical evidence as to whether the claimant locally possesses a model satisfying a predeclared identity relative to the deployed model. Verification is conducted under fresh, previously undisclosed requirements and network isolation, so that the demonstrated capability cannot rely on online external assistance after challenge disclosure. The resulting evidence is interpreted relative to independently specified and calibrated matching and non-matching operating situations and is statistical rather than cryptographic. We instantiate TP-CRIV for CNN image classifiers using probability-control-based witness generation. Experiments on ten ImageNet-pretrained TorchVision models demonstrate clear same/cross-model separation and finite-challenge verification using independently calibrated thresholds.

Teruki Sano, Minoru Kuribayashi, Masao Sakai +4

Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Japan · Center for Data-driven Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tohoku University, Japan

Dataset Ownership Verification Artificial Intelligence Models

Sep 20, 2026cs.SD

TTS-Guard: Black-Box Ownership Verification of Text-to-Speech Models via Adaptive Adversarial Speaker-Pair Fingerprints

The rapid maturation of zero-shot Text-to-Speech (TTS) models has turned high-quality voice cloning into a widely available capability, raising acute concerns over unauthorised replication, fine-tuning and resale of proprietary speech models. Yet ownership verification for TTS remains largely open: speech is a continuous waveform whose perturbations are easily destroyed by routine signal processing, and the human auditory system imposes a much tighter perceptual budget than vision. We present \textbf{TTS-Guard}, a black-box ownership verification framework for TTS models built on \emph{adversarial speaker-pair fingerprints}. TTS-Guard(i) selects key speaker pairs in a \emph{dual} embedding space for architecture-agnostic stealth;(ii) optimises a perturbation through an \emph{adaptive curriculum} of shadow models covering fine-tuning, pruning, quantisation and distillation; and (iii) aggregates black-box queries into a calibrated \emph{Verification Confidence Score}. On five mainstream TTS systems, TTS-Guard reaches an average Fingerprint Success Rate of

96.4\%

at a False Positive Rate of

5.8\%

, while preserving intelligibility and naturalness. The fingerprint remains effective against ten audio attacks, six model modifications, and two state-of-the-art adversarial purifiers.

Xubin Yue, Zhenhua Xu, Zhebo Wang +5

Zhejiang University · Binjiang Institute of Zhejiang University · Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University +1

Cross-Lingual Voice Cloning F5-Tts Dataset Ownership Verification Fingerprint

Aug 14, 2026cs.CL

Training Leaves Traces: Centered Residual Signatures for Language Model Lineage Verification

Open-weight language models are fine-tuned, quantized, pruned, and merged, yet their provenance is often undocumented. We study data-free white-box lineage verification: can weights alone reveal whether two compatible model checkpoints share ancestry? Residual training produces a shared identity-aligned component in branch products, so this structure alone cannot establish ancestry. We remove it and compare checkpoint-specific structure across residual blocks, yielding a symmetric lineage score calibrated against independent checkpoints. On residual-MLP and GPT-2 benchmarks, the score separates fine-tuned, LoRA-merged, pruned, and quantized descendants from independent and distilled models (AUROC=1.0), distinguishing weight ancestry from behavioral similarity. Under function-preserving checkpoint laundering experiments, weight-space baselines lose margin or fail; our score remains unchanged and runs 76x faster than the nearest robust baseline on GPT-2. The projection-pairing signal appears across six language-model families and beyond, and a case study correctly identifies 3 related and 7 unrelated LLaMA-2 public checkpoints. Collectively, these results establish a passive, data-free provenance signal for compatible open-weight language-model checkpoints

Aman Singh Thakur, Rayan Khoury

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

Model Checkpoints Model Weights Dataset Ownership Verification Distributional Signatures

Aug 12, 2026cs.CR

Fingerprinting Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Collapsed Generation

Proprietary text-to-image diffusion models are increasingly distributed as hosted services and downloadable checkpoints, making their intellectual property (IP) protection an increasingly critical concern when model leakage, copying, or unauthorized fine-tuning is disputed. In this work, we present a non-invasive model fingerprinting framework based on \emph{collapsed generation}, a phenomenon where certain input conditions produce highly consistent images across multiple stochastic seeds. We show that collapsed generation is an intrinsic, model-dependent property of the learned generation process. These collapse-prone conditions therefore expose model-specific behavioral signatures, enabling reliable ownership verification without embedding invasive watermarks. After preparing conditions on the source model, the framework verifies a suspect model under two access settings: (1) white-box pipeline access, where optimized continuous embeddings can be injected into the generation process, and (2) black-box API-only access, where natural language prompts are queried through the service interface. In both cases, ownership evidence is measured by whether the suspect model reproduces the source model's collapse behavior across stochastic samplings. Extensive experiments across UNet- and transformer-based diffusion models show that collapsed generation fingerprints can distinguish different source models with low confusion. These fingerprints remain verifiable in fine-tuned derivatives and under common and adaptive model- or query-level obfuscations, while requiring only a modest verification query budget. Together, these results establish collapsed generation as a reliable intrinsic evidence source for non-invasive diffusion model ownership verification.

Yuanmin Huang, Chen Chen, Geng Hong +5

Fudan University, Shanghai, China · East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China · Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China +1

Text-To-Image Diffusion Models Dataset Ownership Verification Diffusion Models Fingerprint Watermarking Obfuscation+1

Aug 8, 2026cs.CR

Targeted Counterfactual Fingerprinting for Black-Box LLM Ownership Verification

Large language models (LLMs) are high-value assets that can be derived through redeployment, fine-tuning, quantization, or further alignment. Because deployed LLMs are commonly exposed only through query APIs, ownership verification must often rely on black-box text responses. This setting is difficult: generations are open-ended and can vary across repeated queries, while existing black-box fingerprints rely on signals that are fragile under a final-response interface, including full-text matching, soft behavioral features, or model-specific prompts designed not to transfer. We propose TCF (Targeted Counterfactual Fingerprinting), a black-box LLM fingerprinting framework that converts open-ended generation comparison into constrained-answer targeted counterfactual transfer. TCF restricts each verification query to a finite answer space, reducing the surface-form ambiguity that enters the verification score, and optimizes a prompt perturbation toward a counterfactual target different from the protected model's clean answer on the original prompt. Verification reduces to checking whether the suspect model's parsed final answer matches the recorded target. We introduce the source-model counterfactual margin (SCM), a protected-model-only quantity that certifies the target is unlikely before the perturbation and likely after it; SCM controls target selection, perturbation stopping, and fingerprint filtering. Under explicit derived-preservation and independent-transfer budgets motivated by local behavioral closeness, we derive a target-accuracy gap between derived and independent models. Across four LLM families, TCF achieves an average AUC of 0.9861, improving over TRAP, ProFLingo, and ZeroPrint by 0.07 to 0.19.

Yutong Wu, Xiaofan Bai, Shixin Li +10

Huazhong University of Science and Technology · Alibaba Group · Microsoft Corporation

Dataset Ownership Verification Fingerprint

Jul 28, 2026cs.CL

Construction-Driven Injection: Linguistically-Grounded Edit-Based Code-Mixing Fingerprints for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) are costly intellectual assets that remain exposed to unauthorized redistribution and commercial misuse. Injected fingerprints, i.e., trigger--target pairs embedded in model behavior, offer a practical, black-box-verifiable ownership signal, but existing methods decouple the two stages of the fingerprint life cycle: how a fingerprint is constructed and how it is injected. Existing fingerprinting frameworks suffer from two limitations. Natural-language fingerprints are prone to accidental activation, and garbled fingerprints are easily filtered by perplexity-based detection. Furthermore, decoupling construction from injection leaves the latter unaware of the trigger's linguistic structure, missing the opportunity for targeted optimization. We argue that fingerprint construction should drive injection, and present a unified fingerprinting framework that jointly optimizes both stages. First, LCF constructs code-mixing fingerprints by combining low-resource languages under a semantic-density substitution rule and grammar-biased mixing, yielding triggers whose perplexity sits far below garbled baselines while avoiding the accidental-activation failures of natural-language triggers. Second, LCFEdit injects each fingerprint with a null-space projection derived from high-resource multilingual representations that preserves knowledge, augmented by a cross-lingual alignment step that steers the weight update toward the fingerprint language's representation subspace. This construction-aware injection ensures that the update is linguistically informed and therefore more stable. Extensive evaluations on imperceptibility, detectability, and harmlessness demonstrate persistent ownership verification with negligible impact on utility.

Yongyi Cui, Yue Li, Tianbao Jiang +1

East China Normal University

Fingerprint Instruction Injection Attacks Dataset Ownership Verification

Jul 22, 2026cs.CR

Evaluating Large Language Models for Symbolic Security Protocol Analysis

Security protocols verification relies on formal tools such as ProVerif and OFMC. This study evaluates whether large language models (LLMs) can perform comparable analysis. We test GPT and DeepSeek in chat and reasoning modes over three runs on 130 obfuscated AnB/AnBx protocols covering 388 security goals, scored against ProVerif and OFMC. Each provider uses a single model in both modes, switching reasoning on and off, so both contrasts isolate reasoning itself. Chat models achieve 72.7% recall at 27.3% precision for GPT and 69.3% recall at 27.2% precision for DeepSeek. Reasoning models reverse this trade-off, reaching 66.5% precision and 54.5% recall for GPT and 45.4% precision and 57.3% recall for DeepSeek. Enabling reasoning lifts precision from 27.3% to 64.8% for GPT and from 27.2% to 44.4% for DeepSeek on the consolidated verdict. The goal set is imbalanced, with 89 vulnerable goals against 299 secure ones; a trivial always-secure predictor scores 77.1% accuracy, which only GPT reasoning exceeds. All models perform worst on authentication goals: reasoning models detect well under half of injective and non-injective agreement attacks, whereas chat models over-flag them at low precision. Confidentiality is the exception, with F1 up to 95.7% in reasoning mode. Verdicts are unstable across runs: identical on 89.7% of goals for GPT reasoning, 74.0% for DeepSeek reasoning, 70.1% for GPT chat, and 61.6% for DeepSeek chat. Self-reported confidence is uniformly high yet shows no meaningful correlation with correctness. All results rest on a single zero-shot prompt and two model providers, which limits generalisability. On this benchmark, LLMs do not match formal verification, but may serve, at best, as pre-screening filters.

Paolo Modesti, Syed Ahmed, Ioannis Sfyrakis +1

Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Large Language Model Safety Security Evaluation Formal Verification Dataset Ownership Verification Deepseek Chatbots

Jul 10, 2026cs.CR

RaMark: Radioactive Watermarking for Generated Tabular Data

Recent advances in generative modeling have made generated tabular data a practical solution for privacy-sensitive data sharing, where watermarking enables ownership verification. However, existing watermarking methods fundamentally fail under retraining attacks, in which an adversary retrains a generative model on a watermarked dataset and regenerates high-utility data that no longer carries the watermark. We address this challenge by introducing radioactivity, the property that a watermark remains detectable after generative model retraining, and propose RaMark, a radioactive watermarking method that embeds a sinusoidal dependency as an intrinsic component of the data distribution. By coupling the watermark with the underlying distribution, RaMark ensures that any generative model preserving data utility also has to preserve the watermark. We theoretically show that with high probability removing watermark degrades utility and alters data distribution. Extensive experiments on two real-world tabular datasets, under a large-scale ownership verification setting with

10^5

independent data owners, demonstrate that RaMark achieves substantially stronger radioactivity than seven state-of-the-art methods and consistently outperforms them against both retraining and data modification attacks.

Xin Che, Lingyang Chu, Qiqi Zhang +3

McMaster University Hamilton, Canada · York University Toronto, Canada · Duke University Durham, United States

Watermarking Watermarks Dataset Ownership Verification Synthetic Tabular Data Generative Architectures Generative Models

Jul 6, 2026cs.CR

Privacy-Preserving Robustness Verification for Neural Networks

Neural network verification and data privacy are inherently in tension: verification demands full access to model parameters and input data, yet both are increasingly restricted by privacy regulations and intellectual property constraints. This tension has left robustness verification impractical in privacy-sensitive domains. In this work, we address this gap with SecureCROWN, the first framework for privacy-preserving neural network robustness verification. Built upon secure two-party computation (2PC), our framework enables a model owner and a data owner to jointly compute certified robustness bounds -- revealing only the final result while provably protecting both parties' private data under the semi-honest security model. A key challenge is securely computing the conditional operations in Linear Bound Propagation, where the data-dependent branching is incompatible with standard secure computation protocols. We eliminate branching by formulating conditional logic as continuous arithmetic operations. Additionally, we introduce a Newton--Raphson refinement method to improve numerical stability. Extensive analysis and experiments show that SecureCROWN strictly matches plaintext verification results, while completing in 0.1--200s across varied model sizes and communication settings (LAN/WAN), demonstrating the feasibility of privacy-preserving neural network verification.

Nianyun Song, Xiaokun Luan, Yu Guo +3

School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Education, Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Technology and Educational Application (Ministry of Education), Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China · School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China · School of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Neural Network Verification Robustness Verification Zero-Knowledge Proofs Dataset Ownership Verification Neural Network

Jun 29, 2026cs.LG

Proofs of Ownership for Machine Learning Models

With the increasing adoption of Machine Learning, protecting model ownership has become an essential challenge. We initiate a formal study of Proof of Ownership for machine learning models: under what conditions can one prove that a stolen model originated from a particular creator? We model proofs of ownership as a game among three parties: a model owner, a thief, and a judge. The owner transforms the original model into a slightly perturbed model together with a proof of ownership. The thief then obtains the transformed model and attempts to minimally modify it so that it remains useful but escapes detection as owned by the model owner. Finally, the judge receives a model and a proof of ownership, and must decide whether the given model is a modified version of some model created by the model owner, or else the given model was developed independently. Our main result is a dichotomy for classifiers in the black-box setting: Under standard cryptographic assumptions, ownership of models for some concept class can be proven in the above sense {\em if and only if} the concept class is not self-correctable, in a sense close to that of Blum, Luby and Rubinfeld, STOC'90. The result is constructive and extends, with some variations, to a number of related settings.

Ran Canetti, Shafi Goldwasser, Or Zamir

Boston University · MIT · UC Berkeley +1

Dataset Ownership Verification Zero-Knowledge Proofs Proof Attack Stealthiness

Jun 22, 2026cs.CV

FedOT: Ownership Verification and Leakage Tracing via Watermarks for Federated LDMs

Training Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) within Federated Learning (FL) has attracted increasing attention due to its ability to combine the powerful generative capacity of LDMs with the privacy-preserving properties of FL. However, FL requires sharing the global model with multiple participants, which risks unauthorized model distribution or resale by malicious clients. While an intuitive approach is to adopt existing VAE-based watermarking techniques for LDMs in FL, this strategy falls short in addressing such threats due to two fundamental challenges: (1) Existing methods support ownership verification but lack the ability to trace model leakage to a specific malicious client; (2) VAE-based watermarks are vulnerable, as they can be removed simply by replacing the decoder with a clean counterpart. In this paper, we propose FedOT, the first framework for ownership verification and leakage tracing in federated LDMs. Specifically, to address the first challenge, we design a chunked watermark, where the first part is for ownership verification, and the second part is used for client identification. Furthermore, to overcome the second challenge and secure the model against VAE replacement attack, we introduce Latent Vector Transformation (LVT), which strengthens the connection between the VAE and U-Net latent spaces by modifying the original latent distribution of the VAE. Consequently, any attempt to replace the VAE for watermark removal leads to significant image quality degradation, making the LDM model unusable. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedOT achieves superior performance in both ownership verification and traceability. Project page: https://spyzixuan.github.io/FedOT/.

Wenlong Cheng, Yuan Gan, Yunqiu Xu +1

Northwest Normal University · The University of Tokyo · National University of Singapore +1

Federated Learning Dataset Ownership Verification Watermarks Fedavg Latent Diffusion Model Data Leakage+1

Jun 18, 2026cs.CR

Can LLMs Reason About Brand Ownership? An Empirical Study of Domain Attribution Intelligence

When a new domain resembling a popular brand appears, defenders face a fundamental ambiguity: it may be an attacker-created squatting site for phishing, or it may be a domain the brand itself registered, either defensively, to block attackers, or legitimately, for a new product or service launch. Incorrectly flagging a brand-owned domain as malicious produces a false positive that harms end users and damages the brand's reputation. Resolving this ambiguity requires brand intelligence: the ability to determine, at scale, whether a given domain belongs to a brand. Large language models (LLMs), with their broad knowledge of brand domain relationships, offer a promising zero configuration approach to this problem, but their reliability for brand intelligence tasks remains unknown. We present the first systematic empirical evaluation of LLM brand intelligence across three tasks: domain enumeration (Q1), open ended brand attribution (Q2), and binary ownership classification (Q3). We evaluate four models, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 4.6, across four retrieval settings (in context, web search, WHOIS lookup, and combined) on 36 of the most phished brands. Our results reveal a stark dichotomy: models achieve up to 82% precision enumerating brand domains from memory alone, yet fail at ownership verification without external tools, with macro F1 at most 0.37 in ICL mode. WHOIS augmentation lifts Q3 macro F1 by up to 0.65 points, yielding near perfect precision (<= 0.99), dramatically reducing the false positive risk for defenders. We provide concrete recommendations for deploying LLMs in brand protection pipelines.

Fathima Mashood, Mohamed Nabeel

Brand-As-Memory Dataset Ownership Verification Phishing LLM Reasoning Strategies False-Negative Rate Empirical Study

May 28, 2026cs.CR

Cert-LAS: Toward Certified Model Ownership Verification for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Layer-Adaptive Smoothing

Large-scale text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models have enabled unprecedented creative applications, but their unauthorized use has raised serious intellectual property concerns, making model ownership verification (MOV) increasingly critical. We find that existing backdoor-based diffusion watermarking methods often (implicitly) assume a "faithful" verification process, namely, that the verifier can query a suspicious model and obtain the faithful watermark response to complete MOV. However, in practice, adversaries may intentionally or unintentionally damage potential watermark signals, significantly degrading verification reliability. To address this issue, we propose Cert-LAS, the first certified MOV method for T2I models based on layer-adaptive smoothing. In general, Cert-LAS embeds specified watermarks using diffusion classifiers and an LFS-guided layer-adaptive noise, and verifies ownership by examining whether the suspected model exhibits significantly stronger watermark responses compared to unwatermarked references through hypothesis testing. We further prove that, under certain conditions, our Cert-LAS can still achieve reliable verification even in the presence of malicious removal attacks. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of Cert-LAS and its resistance to adaptive attacks. Our code is available at https://github.com/Leyi-Qi/Cert-LAS.

Leyi Qi, Yiming Li, Siyuan Liang +2

Generative AI Lab, College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore · Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA

Dataset Ownership Verification Text-To-Image Diffusion Models Watermarks Diffusion Models Noise-Aware Smoothing+1

May 9, 2026cs.RO

Towards Backdoor-Based Ownership Verification for Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) support generalist robotic control by enabling end-to-end decision policies directly from multi-modal inputs. As trained VLAs are increasingly shared and adapted, protecting model ownership becomes essential for secure deployment and responsible open-source usage. In this paper, we present GuardVLA, the first backdoor-based ownership verification framework specifically designed for VLAs. GuardVLA embeds a stealthy and harmless backdoor watermark into the protected model during training by injecting secret messages into embodied visual data. For post-release verification, we propose a swap-and-detect mechanism, in which the trigger projector and an external classifier head are used to activate and detect the embedded backdoor based on prediction probabilities. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets, model architectures, and adaptation settings demonstrate that GuardVLA enables reliable ownership verification while preserving benign task performance. Further results show that the embedded watermark remains detectable under post-release model adaptation.

Ming Sun, Rui Wang, Xingrui Yu +5

Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China · School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China · A*STAR Institute of High Performance Computing (A*STAR IHPC), Singapore +5

Diffusion-Based Vision-Language-Actions Dataset Ownership Verification

Apr 24, 2026cs.CR

ArmSSL: Adversarial Robust Black-Box Watermarking for Self-Supervised Learning Pre-trained Encoders

Self-supervised learning (SSL) encoders are invaluable intellectual property (IP). However, no existing SSL watermarking for IP protection can concurrently satisfy the following two practical requirements: (1) provide ownership verification capability under black-box suspect model access once the stolen encoders are used in downstream tasks; (2) be robust under adversarial watermark detection or removal, because the watermark samples form a distinguishable out-of-distribution (OOD) cluster. We propose ArmSSL, an SSL watermarking framework that assures black-box verifiability and adversarial robustness while preserving utility. For verification, we introduce paired discrepancy enlargement, enforcing feature-space orthogonality between the clean and its watermark counterpart to produce a reliable verification signal in black-box against the suspect model. For adversarial robustness, ArmSSL integrates latent representation entanglement and distribution alignment to suppress the OOD clustering. The former entangles watermark representations with clean representations (i.e., from non-source-class) to avoid forming a dense cluster of watermark samples, while the latter minimizes the distributional discrepancy between watermark and clean representations, thereby disguising watermark samples as natural in-distribution data. For utility, a reference-guided watermark tuning strategy is designed to allow the watermark to be learned as a small side task without affecting the main task by aligning the watermarked encoder's outputs with those of the original clean encoder on normal data. Extensive experiments across five mainstream SSL frameworks and nine benchmark datasets, along with end-to-end comparisons with SOTAs, demonstrate that ArmSSL achieves superior ownership verification, negligible utility degradation, and strong robustness against various adversarial detection and removal.

Yongqi Jiang, Yansong Gao, Boyu Kuang +3

Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China · The University of Western Australia, Australia · Zhejiang University, China +1

Watermarking Dataset Ownership Verification Self-Supervised Learning Encoders Black Box

Apr 14, 2026cs.CR

VeriX-Anon: A Multi-Layered Framework for Mathematically Verifiable Outsourced Target-Driven Data Anonymization

Organisations increasingly outsource privacy-sensitive data transformations to cloud providers, yet no practical mechanism lets the data owner verify that the contracted algorithm was faithfully executed. VeriX-Anon is a multi-layered verification framework for outsourced Target-Driven k-anonymization combining three orthogonal mechanisms: deterministic verification via Merkle-style hashing of an Authenticated Decision Tree, probabilistic verification via Boundary Sentinels and exact-duplicate Twins with cryptographic identifiers, and utility-based verification via Explainable AI fingerprinting that compares SHAP value distributions before and after anonymization using the Wasserstein distance. Across seven cross-domain datasets and four cloud profiles (28 scenarios), against Lazy (drops records), Dumb (fake hash), and Approximate (valid hash) adversaries, VeriX-Anon detects 25 of 28 deviations under a fixed threshold and 27 of 28 once the threshold is calibrated per dataset, with no false alarms. No single layer achieved this alone. The XAI layer was the only mechanism that caught the Approximate adversary, succeeding on six of seven datasets and missing only a high-dimensional case where honest generalization shifts SHAP as much as the attack. Target-Driven anonymization preserved significantly more utility than blind splitting, with mean F1 gaps of +0.058 to +0.362 and Wilcoxon p <= 0.001 on six of seven datasets. Client-side verification completes under one second at one million rows. The threat model covers three empirically evaluated profiles and one theoretical Informed Attacker unable to defeat the cryptographic salt. Sentinel evasion probability ranges from near-zero to 0.82 for the most imbalanced data, which the twin layer offsets in every scenario.

Miit Daga, Swarna Priya Ramu

School of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India

Anonymization Dataset Ownership Verification Profile

Jun 16, 2025cs.LG

CertDW: Towards Certified Dataset Ownership Verification via Conformal Calibration

Deep neural networks (DNNs) rely heavily on high-quality open-source datasets (e.g., ImageNet) for their success, making dataset ownership verification (DOV) crucial for protecting public dataset copyrights. In this paper, we find existing DOV methods (implicitly) assume that the verification process is faithful, where the suspicious model will directly verify ownership by using the verification samples as input and returning their results. However, this assumption may not necessarily hold in practice and their performance may degrade sharply when subjected to intentional or unintentional perturbations. To address this limitation, we propose the first certified dataset watermark (i.e., CertDW) and CertDW-based certified dataset ownership verification method that ensures reliable verification even under malicious attacks, under certain conditions (e.g., constrained pixel-level perturbation). Specifically, inspired by conformal prediction, we introduce two statistical measures, including principal probability (PP) and watermark robustness (WR), to assess model prediction stability on benign and watermarked samples under noise perturbations. We derive provable certification conditions relating WR to a PP-based calibration threshold, and a high-probability upper bound on the false positive rate, enabling ownership verification when a suspicious model's WR value significantly exceeds the PP values of multiple benign models trained on watermark-free datasets. If the number of PP values smaller than WR exceeds a threshold determined via conformal calibration, the suspicious model is regarded as having been trained on the protected dataset. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets verify the effectiveness of our CertDW method and its resistance to potential adaptive attacks. Our codes are at \href{https://github.com/NcepuQiaoTing/CertDW}{GitHub}.

Ting Qiao, Yiming Li, Jianbin Li +5

School of Control and Computer Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing,102206, China · College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore · School of Cybersecurity, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, China +2

Dataset Ownership Verification Watermarking Tamper Localization

May 19, 2025cs.LG

RAFP: Identifying LLM Lineages via Rare-Region Fingerprints

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly released under restricted licenses, creating a growing need for robust model ownership verification. Existing fingerprinting methods are often fragile under downstream finetuning, require invasive training modifications, or fail in black-box settings. We introduce RAFP, a robust framework for identifying LLM lineages via rare-region fingerprints. Our key insight is that downstream finetuning primarily updates common high-density language behaviors, while low-probability prompt regions receive weak optimization signal and limited gradient alignment under finetuned distribution. As a result, rare prompt-response behaviors remain stable across common model adaptations. RAFP is non-invasive, constructing fingerprints via discrete gradient-based optimization over rare prompts without modifying model weights. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that the likelihood change of rare-region fingerprints under finetuning remains bounded. Experiments across four LLM families and multiple downstream adaptations, including supervised finetuning, LoRA, quantization, prompt-template variation, and decoding changes, show that RAFP achieves strong fingerprint persistence and substantially outperforms prior fingerprinting baselines in black-box settings.

Yun-Yun Tsai, Jia Hao Liang, Chuan Guo +2

Columbia University / Meta · New York / Menlo Park, USA · MIT +5

Fingerprint Large Language Model Fine-Tuning Supervised Finetuning Dataset Ownership Verification

Mar 2, 2025cs.CR

CBW: Towards Dataset Ownership Verification for Speaker Verification via Clustering-based Backdoor Watermarking

Speaker verification models are trained on large-scale public datasets whose licenses usually prohibit unauthorized commercial use, yet such infringement is difficult to detect or deter. Dataset ownership verification (DOV) is the mainstream countermeasure: it can watermark a dataset with backdoor attacks so that models trained on it exhibit owner-specified behaviors. However, existing DOV methods presuppose a closed label space fixed at watermarking time, whereas in open-set speaker verification the identities that a deployed model accepts are enrolled by third parties after release and are never observed by the dataset owner. We show that straightforward adaptations fail in two characteristic modes, and accordingly distill three requirements for an effective watermark, namely identity agnosticism, coverage, and fidelity, together with an intrinsic tension between the latter two. Our clustering-based backdoor watermark (CBW) resolves this tension by partitioning training speakers into clusters by feature similarity and implanting a distinct trigger for each cluster, so that each trigger covers one region of the speaker embedding space while the trigger set is designed to jointly cover it. We further develop paired hypothesis tests for ownership verification under both the similarity-available and the decision-only black-box settings at the 1-to-1 and 1-to-

N

enrollment scales, and theoretically characterize when the audit succeeds, including an exact small-sample certificate and the effect of the enrollment size. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets and representative models verify the effectiveness of our CBW, its resistance to watermark-removal attacks, and its transferability across model structures. Code is at https://github.com/Radiant0726/CBW/tree/master.

Yiming Li, Kaiying Yan, Jiawen Diao +4

College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore · School of Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China · Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute, Beijing, 100070, China +4

Dataset Ownership Verification Automatic Speaker Verification Speaker Watermarking Finite-Sample Certificates