Feed-Forward Visual Geometry Estimation

Recent momentum

-33%

4 papers in the last 28 days · 0.1% of indexed attention

Twelve weeks of publication activity for this topic as it is defined today.

Weekly history

Recent digests

What was published in this topic, kept on the site without email delivery.

Period ending 2026-09-21

1 new paper

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Feed-Forward Visual Geometry Estimation.

Period ending 2026-09-14

1 new paper

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Feed-Forward Visual Geometry Estimation.

Period ending 2026-09-07

3 new papers

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Feed-Forward Visual Geometry Estimation.

62 papers

Latest in Feed-Forward Visual Geometry Estimation

Feb 5, 2026cs.CV

Geometric Observability Index: An Operator-Theoretic Framework for Per-Feature Sensitivity, Weak Observability, and Dynamic Effects in SE(3) Pose Estimation

We introduce the Geometric Observability Index (GOI), a per-feature sensitivity measure for pose estimation on SE(3). For a Gauss-Newton curvature matrix H=E[JWJ]H=E[J^\top WJ] and a Riemannian metric GG on the Lie algebra, the index is the GG-norm of the influence a single measurement exerts on the estimated pose: GOI(z)=AOO1POφ(z)G\mathrm{GOI}(z)=\|\mathcal{A}_{OO}^{-1}P_O\,\varphi(z)\|_G, where ψ(z)=JWr(z)ψ(z)=J^\top Wr(z) is the score, φ=G1ψ\varphi=G^{-1}ψ its gradient representative, A=G1H\mathcal{A}=G^{-1}H the curvature operator (self-adjoint in the GG-inner product), O=range(A)O=\mathrm{range}(\mathcal{A}) the observable subspace, and AOO\mathcal{A}_{OO} its restriction. This single object (i) equals the norm of the M-estimator influence function, (ii) is governed by the Fisher information, which coincides with the curvature, (iii) exposes weak observability through the smallest eigenvalue λminλ_{\min}, which (iv) also governs finite-sample stability. Operationally the theory cuts both ways. The index is the exact per-measurement attribution: it predicts the true leave-one-out pose shift with log-correlation r=1.00r=1.00. But we also prove that the influence standardized by its inlier null covariance collapses exactly to the classical chi-square residual statistic: residual gating is the leverage-corrected influence test, explaining its robustness from first principles, while raw-influence gating conflates a measurement's information with its harm and over-rejects high-leverage inliers in weakly observable geometry. Experiments on synthetic problems, five TUM RGB-D dynamic sequences, and two KITTI odometry sequences confirm the picture: the two criteria coincide under well-conditioned geometry, and raw-influence gating degrades significantly at cond(H)104\mathrm{cond}(H)\approx 10^4, as the leverage analysis predicts for noise-dominated weak directions. All quantitative claims are validated; code is released.
Joe-Mei Feng, Sheng-Wei Yu, Hsin-Hsiung Kao
Feb 4, 2026cs.CV

SalFormer360: a transformer-based saliency estimation model for 360-degree videos

Saliency estimation has received growing attention in recent years due to its importance in a wide range of applications. In the context of 360-degree video, it has been particularly valuable for tasks such as viewport prediction and immersive content optimization. In this paper, we propose SalFormer360, a novel saliency estimation model for 360-degree videos built on a transformer-based architecture. Our approach is based on the combination of an existing encoder architecture, SegFormer, and a custom decoder. The SegFormer model was originally developed for 2D segmentation tasks, and it has been fine-tuned to adapt it to 360-degree content. To further enhance prediction accuracy in our model, we incorporated Viewing Center Bias to reflect user attention in 360-degree environments. Extensive experiments on the three largest benchmark datasets for saliency estimation demonstrate that SalFormer360 outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. In terms of Pearson Correlation Coefficient, our model achieves 8.4% higher performance on Sport360, 2.5% on PVS-HM, and 18.6% on VR-EyeTracking compared to previous state-of-the-art.
Mahmoud Z. A. Wahba, Francesco Barbato, Sara Baldoni +1