Inverse Problems
Overview
Inverse problems work backward from observations to estimate the hidden image, physical state, or system parameters that produced them, often when measurements are sparse, noisy, or ambiguous. Methods range from classical regularization and optimization to physics-informed neural networks, learned operators, and generative priors such as diffusion and flow models; Bayesian methods can also represent multiple plausible solutions and their uncertainty. Applications include medical and computational imaging, seismic exploration, spectroscopy, and identifying material or dynamical properties from sensor data. A central challenge is balancing measurement consistency with useful prior information: learned priors can recover detail but may invent unsupported structure, especially when the forward model or data differs from training, so identifiability, stability, and calibrated uncertainty remain important.
Latest papers
246 papers30 papers in the last four weeks, up 36% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.
Infinite dimensional generative sensing
Neural Electromagnetic Fields for High-Resolution Material Parameter Reconstruction
Constrained Particle Seeking: Solving Diffusion Inverse Problems with Just Forward Passes
FAST-DIPS: Adjoint-Free Analytic Steps and Hard-Constrained Likelihood Correction for Diffusion-Prior Inverse Problems
PhysFormer: A Physics-Embedded Generative Model for Physically Self-Consistent Spectral Synthesis
Dual-space posterior sampling for Bayesian inference in constrained inverse problems
DiffSOS: Acoustic Conditional Diffusion Model for Speed-of-Sound Reconstruction in Ultrasound Computed Tomography
Improving Full Waveform Inversion in Large Model Era
Advancing accelerator virtual beam diagnostics through latent evolution modeling: an integrated solution to forward, inverse, tuning, and UQ problems
Learning to reconstruct from saturated data: audio declipping and high-dynamic range imaging
GSNR: Graph Smooth Null-Space Representation for Inverse Problems
Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Models of Variable Selection
for each'') and *adaptive* (for all'') models of sparse recovery. We show that under an oblivious model, the optimal error is attainable in near-linear time with samples, whereas in an adaptive model, samples are necessary for any algorithm to achieve this bound. This establishes a surprising contrast with the standard setting, where samples suffice even for adaptive sparse recovery. We conclude with a preliminary examination of a partially-adaptive model, where we show nontrivial variable selection guarantees are possible with measurements.