Language Model Merging

Merging separately trained LoRA adapters is a practical alternative to joint multi-task training, but it often hurts performance. Existing methods usually treat the LoRA update $ΔW = BA$ as a single object and do not distinguish the two LoRA matrices. We show that the main source of LoRA merge interference comes from the output-side matrix $B$. Across tasks, $B$ repeatedly uses a small set of shared directions, while $A$ remains much more task-specific. As a result, the merged adapter overemphasizes these shared directions, and task-specific information is lost. We propose Pico (Pre-merge interference calibration in output-space), a data-free method that calibrates $B$ before merge by downscaling over-shared directions and then rescaling the merged update. Pico plugs directly into existing merging methods such as Task Arithmetic, TIES, and TSV-M. Across eight different benchmarks from math, coding, finance, and medical domains, Pico improves average accuracy by 3.4-8.3 points over the corresponding base method and achieves the best overall average performance. Pico also enables merged adapters to outperform the LoRA trained with all task data. These results show that LoRA merging works better when the two LoRA matrices are treated separately.

Weight-space model merging combines independently fine-tuned checkpoints without access to the original training data. While merging has shown promise in multitask settings, its behavior in multilingual generative systems remains underexplored. We systematically study weight-space merging for multilingual machine translation by fully fine-tuning language models on large-scale bilingual corpora and evaluating representative merging strategies across shared-source, shared-target, and bidirectional consolidation settings. Our experiments reveal a strong directional asymmetry. Merging is comparatively more effective when models share a target language, improving multilingual coverage over the base model, but it still fails to preserve the peak performance of language-specific checkpoints. In contrast, when target languages differ, performance degrades sharply, especially in shared-source and bidirectional settings. To explain this behavior, we analyze internal representations and find that fine-tuning does not create disjoint language-specific sub-networks. Instead, independently fine-tuned models activate largely overlapping neurons while reshaping upper-layer target-generation representations into incompatible geometries. These findings suggest that multilingual merging failures arise from target-side geometric misalignment within shared computational units, challenging the assumptions underlying standard weight-space merging for multilingual translation. We make the code publicly available at https://github.com/babangain/mt-model-merging

Model merging provides a way of cheaply combining individual models to produce a model that inherits each individual's capabilities. While some merging methods can approach the performance of multitask training, they are often heuristically motivated and lack theoretical justification. A principled alternative is to pose model merging as a layer-wise optimization problem that directly minimizes interference between tasks. However, this formulation requires estimating per-layer covariance matrices from data, which may not be available when performing merging. In contrast, many of the heuristically-motivated methods do not require auxiliary data, making them practically advantageous. In this work, we revisit the interference minimization framework and show that, under certain conditions, covariance matrices can be estimated directly from difference matrices, eliminating the need for data while also reducing computational costs. We validate our approach across vision and language benchmarks on models ranging from 86M parameters to 7B parameters, outperforming previous data-free state-of-the-art merging methods

The widespread availability of fine-tuned LoRA modules for open pre-trained models has led to an interest in methods that can adaptively merge LoRAs to improve performance. These methods typically include some way of selecting LoRAs from a pool and tune merging coefficients based on a task-specific dataset. While adaptive merging methods have demonstrated improvements in some settings, no past work has attempted to recycle LoRAs found "in the wild" on model repositories like the Hugging Face Hub. To address this gap, we consider recycling from a pool of nearly 1,000 user-contributed LoRAs trained from the Llama 3.1 8B-Instruct language model. Our empirical study includes a range of adaptive and non-adaptive merging methods in addition to a new method designed via a wide search over the methodological design space. We demonstrate that adaptive merging methods can improve performance over the base model but provide limited benefit over training a new LoRA on the same data used to set merging coefficients. We additionally find not only that the specific choice of LoRAs to merge has little importance, but that using LoRAs with randomly initialized parameter values yields similar performance. This raises the possibility that adaptive merging from recycled LoRAs primarily works via some kind of regularization effect, rather than by enabling positive cross-task transfer. To better understand why past work has proven successful, we confirm that positive transfer is indeed possible when there are highly relevant LoRAs in the pool. We release the model checkpoints and code online.

Information-seeking agents have emerged as a powerful paradigm for knowledge-intensive tasks, yet today's systems remain specialized for the open web, documents, or local knowledge bases, hindering scalable and cross-domain deployment. We present the first systematic empirical study of consolidating these information-seeking agents into a single foundation agentic model. We compare two paradigms -- \emph{data-level mixing}, which trains a unified model on a mixture of datasets, and \emph{parameter-level merging}, which merges independently trained experts in parameter space -- across 3 training scenarios, evaluating \textbf{26} representative parameter-level methods on \textbf{10} benchmarks. To compare across heterogeneous benchmarks, we introduce a geometric Composite Score and an Imbalance Score that describe overall performance and task skew. Our analysis shows that (i) well-designed parameter-level merging attains parity with data mixing at a fraction of its training cost and is order-agnostic; (ii) parameter-level merging structurally preserves out-of-domain capabilities that data mixing universally forgets; and (iii) cross-scenario stability is strongly tied to consolidation quality. We distil our observations into a method-selection guide and design principles for next-generation merging operators.

LLM services need to offer a family of models spanning different capability--cost trade-offs to accommodate diverse user preferences. Model merging offers a practical way to construct such a model family by combining a reasoning-enhanced model with an instruction-tuned model. Compared with model-level merging, layer-wise merging offers finer control over the capability--cost trade-off by assigning different merge weights to individual layers. However, it introduces two practical challenges: the layer-wise search space is high-dimensional, and existing methods rarely exploit informative signals from the source models; moreover, the highly variable runtime of LLM evaluations makes synchronous batch optimization inefficient by leaving GPU resources idle while waiting for slow evaluations. To address these challenges, we propose Asynchronous Prior-Guided Bayesian Model Merging (AP-BMM), which formulates layer-wise merging as a multi-objective optimization problem to approximate a Pareto set of merged LLMs, yielding a family of Pareto-optimal merged models with diverse capability--cost trade-offs. AP-BMM leverages parameter and activation discrepancies between the source models to guide the early layer-wise search, employs asynchronous pending-aware Bayesian optimization to maximize GPU utilization through asynchronous evaluations and to select high-quality candidates via pending awareness, and applies lightweight ranking over an oversized candidate pool to improve Pareto-front coverage. Under fixed evaluation budgets, AP-BMM achieves higher hypervolume (HV) and broader Pareto-front coverage than synchronous layer-wise and representative model-level merging methods, while reducing wall-clock time through higher GPU utilization.

The "alignment tax" of post-training is typically framed as a drop in task accuracy. We show it also involves a severe loss of calibration, making models overconfident, less reliable, and model outputs less diverse. We show that this trade-off can be navigated effectively via a simple post-hoc intervention: interpolating between a model's weights before and after alignment. Crucially, this is not a strict trade-off. We find that the process consistently reveals Pareto-optimal interpolations - models that improve accuracy beyond both parents while substantially recovering the calibration lost during alignment. Our work demonstrates that simple model merging provides a computationally efficient method for mitigating the full scope of the alignment tax, yielding models that are more capable and more reliable.

On-device deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently leverages Low-Rank Adapters (LoRAs) to support diverse downstream tasks under tight resource constraints. To address the limited storage capacity of mobile devices, recent works have explored model merging techniques to fuse multiple LoRAs into a single one. In practice, however, LoRAs are often delivered incrementally, as users request support for new tasks (e.g., novel problem types or languages). This scenario introduces a new challenge: on-device online continual merging, where the objective is to incorporate new LoRAs while preserving the performance on previously supported tasks. In this paper, we propose a data-free and computationally efficient strategy for selecting and merging LoRAs when a new one becomes available, assuming the device can store only a limited number of adapters. Extensive experiments across real-world tasks demonstrate the superiority of our approach compared to alternative strategies while adhering to the storage budget and compute limitations of on-device settings. The project page is available at: https://donaldssh.github.io/K-Merge.

Pareto fronts are useful to find good task-mixing strategies for multitask finetuning, but they are also costly to compute. To reduce costs, recent works have used existing model merging methods to help train cheap surrogate models to estimate the Pareto fronts. However, no work has yet considered designing new model-merging methods to directly, and provably, improve the quality of Pareto fronts. Here, we fill this gap by proposing a new Bayesian approach called Variational Model Merging. In this approach, existing model-merging methods are obtained as special cases of "posterior-merging" when Gaussian posteriors are used and new model-merging strategies can be derived by using non-Gaussian posteriors. Our main theoretical result is to show that more flexible posteriors necessarily yield better estimates of Pareto fronts. For instance, a Pareto front estimate obtained by merging full-Gaussian posteriors is expected to be better than that obtained by using isotropic Gaussian posteriors. We validate the theory through extensive empirical results on vision and language transformers where better Gaussian families consistently yields better or comparable Pareto fronts. Our work is a rare instance where Bayesian ideas are used to improve Pareto analysis.