Input Modality

The field of sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) mainly uses posture, motion and context data of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) to identify daily activities. Despite the advancements in learning-based methods, it is challenging to perform information fusion from the temporal perspective due to the complexities in fusing heterogeneous sensor data and establishing long-term context correlations. This paper proposes a novel triple spectral fusion framework tailored for HAR. First, we develop an adaptive complementary filtering technique for noise suppression and organize each IMU's sensors into posture and motion modality nodes. Given that IMU nodes form a dynamic heterogeneous graph, we then apply adaptive filtering within the graph Fourier domain to merge both homogeneous and heterogeneous node information. Furthermore, an adaptive wavelet frequency selection approach is implemented to suppress context redundancy and shorten the length of features. This approach enhances both timestamp-based graph aggregation and the correlation of long-term contexts. Our framework uses adaptive filtering in the Fourier, graph Fourier, and wavelet domains, enabling effective multi-sensor fusion and context correlation. Extensive experiments on ten benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our framework. Project page: https://github.com/crocodilegogogo/TSF-TPAMI2026.

Modern machine learning optimizes for accuracy without explicit treatment of internal computational cost, even though physical and biological systems operate under intrinsic energy constraints. We evaluate energy-aware learning across 2,203 experiments spanning vision, text, neuromorphic, and physiological datasets with 10 seeds per configuration and factorial statistical analysis. Three findings emerge. First, architecture alone explains negligible variance in accuracy (partial eta^2 = 0.001), while the architecture x dataset interaction is large (partial eta^2 = 0.44, p < 0.001), demonstrating that optimal architecture depends critically on task modality and rejecting the assumption of a universal best architecture. Second, a controlled lambda-sweep across lambda in {0, 1e-5, 1e-4, 1e-3, 1e-2} validates a single-parameter energy-regularized objective L = L_CE + lambda * E(theta, x): across this range, internal activation energy decreases by approximately three orders of magnitude relative to the unregularized lambda=0 baseline, with negligible accuracy change (<0.5 percentage points) on both MNIST and Fashion-MNIST. Third, energy-first architectures inspired by an action-principle framework yield 5-33% within-modality training-efficiency gains over conventional baselines. These results emerge from a research program that interprets learning through a structural correspondence between the action functional in classical mechanics, free energy in statistical physics, and KL-regularized objectives in variational inference. We frame this correspondence as a design hypothesis, not a derivation.

We define and investigate source-modality monitoring -- the ability of multimodal models to track and communicate the input source from which pieces of information originate. We consider source-modality monitoring as an instance of the more general binding problem, and evaluate the extent to which models exploit syntactic vs. semantic signals in order to bind words like image in a user-provided prompt to specific components of their input and context (i.e., actual images). Across experiments spanning 11 vision-language models (VLMs) performing target-modality information retrieval tasks, we find that both syntactic and semantic signals play an important role, but that the latter tend to outweigh the former in cases when modalities are highly distinct distributionally. We discuss the implications of these findings for model robustness, and in the context of increasingly multimodal agentic systems.

Native Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) have shifted from pipeline architectures to unified representation spaces. However, this native integration gives rise to a critical yet underexplored phenomenon: modality preference. To bridge this gap, we first systematically quantify modality preference of OLLMs using a newly-curated conflict-based benchmark and the modality selection rate metric. Our evaluation of ten representative OLLMs reveals a notable paradigm shift: unlike the ``text-dominance'' of traditional VLMs, most OLLMs exhibit a pronounced visual preference. To further understand the underlying mechanism, we conduct layer-wise probing and demonstrate that such modality preference is not static but emerges progressively in the mid-to-late layers. Building upon these insights, we leverage these internal signals to diagnose cross-modal hallucinations, achieving competitive performance across three downstream multi-modal benchmarks without task-specific data. Our work provides both a mechanistic understanding and a practical tool for building more trustworthy OLLMs. Our code and related resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/icip-cas/OmniPreference

Generative AI, particularly Large Language Models, increasingly integrates graph-based representations to enhance reasoning, retrieval, and structured decision-making. Despite rapid advances, there remains limited clarity regarding when, why, where, and what types of graph-LLM integrations are most appropriate across applications. This survey provides a concise, structured overview of the design choices underlying the integration of graphs with LLMs. We categorize existing methods based on their purpose (reasoning, retrieval, generation, recommendation), graph modality (knowledge graphs, scene graphs, interaction graphs, causal graphs, dependency graphs), and integration strategies (prompting, augmentation, training, or agent-based use). By mapping representative works across domains such as cybersecurity, healthcare, materials science, finance, robotics, and multimodal environments, we highlight the strengths, limitations, and best-fit scenarios for each technique. This survey aims to offer researchers a practical guide for selecting the most suitable graph-LLM approach depending on task requirements, data characteristics, and reasoning complexity.

Recent advances in vision language models (VLMs) offer reasoning capabilities, yet how these unfold and integrate visual and textual information remains unclear. We analyze reasoning dynamics in 18 VLMs covering instruction-tuned and reasoning-trained models from two different model families. We track confidence over Chain-of-Thought (CoT), measure the corrective effect of reasoning, and evaluate the contribution of intermediate reasoning steps. We find that models are prone to answer inertia, in which early commitments to a prediction are reinforced, rather than revised during reasoning steps. While reasoning-trained models show stronger corrective behavior, their gains depend on modality conditions, from text-dominant to vision-only settings. Using controlled interventions with misleading textual cues, we show that models are consistently influenced by these cues even when visual evidence is sufficient, and assess whether this influence is recoverable from CoT. Although this influence can appear in the CoT, its detectability varies across models and depends on what is being monitored. Reasoning-trained models are more likely to explicitly refer to the cues, but their longer and fluent CoTs can still appear visually grounded while actually following textual cues, obscuring modality reliance. In contrast, instruction-tuned models refer to the cues less explicitly, but their shorter traces reveal inconsistencies with the visual input. Taken together, these findings indicate that CoT provides only a partial view of how different modalities drive VLM decisions, with important implications for the transparency and safety of multimodal systems.

The growing ubiquity of Extended Reality (XR) is driving Conversational Recommendation Systems (CRS) toward visually immersive experiences. We formalize this paradigm as Immersive CRS (ICRS), where recommended items are highlighted directly in the user's scene-based visual environment and augmented with in-situ labels. While item recommendation has been widely studied, the problem of how to select and evaluate which information to present as immersive labels remains an open problem. To this end, we introduce a principled categorization of information needs into explicit intent satisfaction and proactive information needs and use these to define novel evaluation metrics for item label selection. We benchmark IR-, LLM-, and VLM-based methods across three datasets and ICRS scenarios: fashion, movie recommendation, and retail shopping. Our evaluation reveals three important limitations of existing methods: (1) they fail to leverage scenario-specific information modalities (e.g., visual cues for fashion, meta-data for retail), (2) they present redundant information that is visually inferable, and (3) they poorly anticipate users' proactive information needs from explicit dialogue alone. In summary, this work provides both a novel evaluation paradigm for in-situ item labeling in ICRS and highlights key challenges for future work.

MultiModal Recommendation (MMR) systems have emerged as a promising solution for improving recommendation quality by leveraging rich item-side modality information, prompting a surge of diverse methods. Despite these advances, existing methods still face two critical limitations. First, they use raw modality features to construct item-item links for enriching the behavior graph, while giving limited attention to balancing collaborative and modality-aware semantics or mitigating modality noise in the process. Second, they use a uniform alignment weight across all entities and also maintain a fixed alignment strength throughout training, limiting the effectiveness of modality-behavior alignment. To address these challenges, we propose EGRA. First, instead of relying on raw modality features, it alleviates sparsity by incorporating into the behavior graph an item-item graph built from representations generated by a pretrained MMR model. This enables the graph to capture both collaborative patterns and modality aware similarities with enhanced robustness against modality noise. Moreover, it introduces a novel bi-level dynamic alignment weighting mechanism to improve modality-behavior representation alignment, which dynamically assigns alignment strength across entities according to their alignment degree, while gradually increasing the overall alignment intensity throughout training. Extensive experiments on five datasets show that EGRA significantly outperforms recent methods, confirming its effectiveness.

Multi-view learning is widely applied to real-life datasets, but it often suffers from both missing views and missing labels. Prior probabilistic approaches addressed the missing view problem by using a product-of-experts scheme to aggregate representations from present views and achieved superior performance over deterministic classifiers, using the information bottleneck (IB) principle. However, the IB framework is inherently fully supervised and cannot leverage unlabeled data. In this work, we propose a semi-supervised generative model that utilizes both labeled and unlabeled samples in a unified framework. Our method maximizes the likelihood of unlabeled samples to learn a latent space shared with the IB on labeled data. We also include modality-specific information in likelihood modeling and perform cross-view mutual information maximization in the shared latent space to enhance the extraction of shared information across views. Compared to existing approaches, our model achieves better predictive and generation performance on complex datasets with missing views and limited labeled samples.

The emergence of audio-visual foundation models underscores the importance of reliably assessing their multi-modal understanding. The VGGSound dataset is commonly used as a benchmark for evaluation audio-visual classification. However, our analysis identifies several limitations of VGGSound, including incomplete labelling, partially overlapping classes, and misaligned modalities. These lead to distorted evaluations of auditory and visual capabilities. To address these limitations, we introduce VGGSounder, a comprehensively re-annotated, multi-label test set that extends VGGSound and is specifically designed to evaluate audio-visual foundation models. VGGSounder features detailed modality annotations, enabling precise analyses of modality-specific performance. Furthermore, we reveal model limitations by analysing performance degradation when adding another input modality with our new modality confusion metric.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) suffer from cross-modal hallucinations, where one modality inappropriately influences generation about another, leading to fabricated output. This exposes a more fundamental deficiency in modality-interaction control. To address this, we propose Modality-Adaptive Decoding (MAD), a training-free method that adaptively weights modality-specific decoding branches based on task requirements. MAD leverages the model's inherent ability to self-assess modality relevance by querying which modalities are needed for each task. The extracted modality probabilities are then used to adaptively weight contrastive decoding branches, enabling the model to focus on relevant information while suppressing cross-modal interference. Extensive experiments on CMM and AVHBench demonstrate that MAD significantly reduces cross-modal hallucinations across multiple audio-visual language models (7.8% and 2.0% improvements for VideoLLaMA2-AV, 8.7% and 4.7% improvements for Qwen2.5-Omni). Our approach demonstrates that explicit modality awareness through self-assessment is crucial for robust multimodal reasoning, offering a principled extension to existing contrastive decoding methods. Our code is available at \href{https://github.com/top-yun/MAD}{https://github.com/top-yun/MAD}

Humans understand and interact with the real world by relying on diverse physical feedback beyond visual perception. Motivated by this, recent approaches attempt to incorporate physical sensory signals into Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs). However, they typically focus on a single type of physical signal, failing to capture the heterogeneous and complementary nature of real-world interactions. In this paper, we propose MoSS, a modular sensory stream framework that adapts VLAs to leverage multiple sensory signals for action prediction. Specifically, we introduce decoupled modality streams that integrate heterogeneous physical signals into the action stream via joint cross-modal self-attention. To enable stable incorporation of new modalities, we adopt a two-stage training scheme that freezes pretrained VLA parameters in the early stage. Furthermore, to better capture contact interaction dynamics, we incorporate an auxiliary task that predicts future physical signals. Through extensive real-world experiments, we demonstrate that MoSS successfully augments VLAs to leverage diverse physical signals (i.e., tactile, force, and torque), integrating multiple signals to achieve synergistic performance gains.

Current methods for multimodal medical image classification (M3IC) face two major challenges. First, the prevailing "fusion after unimodal image embedding" paradigm cannot fully exploit the complementary and correlated information in the multimodal data. Second, the scarcity of labeled multimodal medical images, coupled with their substantial domain shift from natural images, impedes the use of cutting-edge Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) for medical image embedding. To jointly address the challenges, we propose a novel Early Intervention (EI) framework. Treating one modality as target and the rest as reference, EI harnesses high-level semantic tokens from the reference as intervention tokens to steer the target modality's embedding process at an early stage. For parameter-efficient VFM adaptation, we introduce Mixture of varied-rank LoRAs (MoR), which employs a small set of LoRA experts with distinct ranks and a bypass-allowed router. Extensive experiments on three public datasets, covering retinal disease recognition, skin lesion recognition, and knee anomaly classification, verify the effectiveness of the proposed method against a number of competitive baselines.