Quantum Circuit Trainability

Variational Quantum Circuits (VQCs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for quantum machine learning in the NISQ era. While parameter sharing in VQCs can reduce the parameter space dimensionality and potentially mitigate the barren plateau phenomenon, it introduces a complex trade-off that has been largely overlooked. This paper investigates how parameter sharing, despite creating better global optima with fewer parameters, fundamentally alters the optimization landscape through deceptive gradients -- regions where gradient information exists but systematically misleads optimizers away from global optima. Through systematic experimental analysis, we demonstrate that increasing degrees of parameter sharing generate more complex solution landscapes with heightened gradient magnitudes and measurably higher deceptiveness ratios. Our findings reveal that traditional gradient-based optimizers (Adam, SGD) show progressively degraded convergence as parameter sharing increases, with performance heavily dependent on hyperparameter selection. We introduce a novel gradient deceptiveness detection algorithm and a quantitative framework for measuring optimization difficulty in quantum circuits, establishing that while parameter sharing can improve circuit expressivity by orders of magnitude, this comes at the cost of significantly increased landscape deceptiveness. These insights provide important considerations for quantum circuit design in practical applications, highlighting the fundamental mismatch between classical optimization strategies and quantum parameter landscapes shaped by parameter sharing.

Quantum neural networks (QNNs) have attracted growing interest for scientific machine learning, yet in regression settings they often suffer from limited trainability under noisy gradients and ill-conditioned optimization. We propose a hybrid quantum--classical regression framework designed to mitigate these bottlenecks. Our model prepends a lightweight classical embedding that acts as a learnable geometric preconditioner, reshaping the input representation to better condition a downstream variational quantum circuit. Building on this architecture, we introduce a curriculum optimization protocol that progressively increases circuit depth and transitions from SPSA-based stochastic exploration to Adam-based gradient fine-tuning. We evaluate the approach on PDE-informed regression benchmarks and standard regression datasets under a fixed training budget in a simulator setting. Empirically, the proposed framework consistently improves over pure QNN baselines and yields more stable convergence in data-limited regimes. We further observe reduced structured errors that are visually correlated with oscillatory components on several scientific benchmarks, suggesting that geometric preconditioning combined with curriculum training is a practical approach for stabilizing quantum regression.

Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are a promising approach for leveraging near-term quantum computers, but trainability and quantum-resource costs remain major challenges. Here we address these challenges with the Hardware Efficient and dynamical LIe algebra supported Ansatz (HELIA) and two training methods combining the classical-enhanced \g method with the quantum-based Parameter-Shift Rule (PSR). This distributes gradient estimation and training across classical and quantum hardware. We evaluate ground-state estimation of 6- to 18-qubit Hamiltonians using the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and quantum phase classification for Hamiltonians up to 12 qubits. For VQE, our methods improve accuracy and success rates, with a mean reduction in estimated logical quantum evaluations of up to $60\%$ relative to Full-PSR training of the same ansatz. For classification, the largest improvement in mean peak test accuracy relative to Full-PSR is $2.8$ percentage points. We also use these methods as a warm-start pretraining strategy for Hamiltonians with exponential-dimensional dynamical Lie algebras. Gradient diagnostics for the studied Hamiltonian configurations show slower gradient-variance decay than the selected deep hardware-efficient reference over the simulated system sizes, potentially paving the way for training large-qubit quantum models.

The $2^N$ dimensions of Hilbert space give quantum metric learning exponentially many mutually orthogonal states with which to separate classes, but the same exponential dimension also degrades its optimization landscape and the tractability of evaluating its metric. By letting a classical network predict all gate parameters of a fixed ansatz, we isolate the reachable state manifold and its fidelity metric. We prove that this separability is already present on the unentangled manifold $\mathbb{M}_{\text{unentangled}} = (\mathbb{CP}^1)^N$, which saturates the $2^N$ maximal orthogonal capacity needed for classification, while entanglement adds states only at intermediate separations, which are costly to resolve under finite sampling. The same size carries costs. Global fidelity causes exponential gradient collapse across both unentangled ($Θ(c^{-N})$) and entangled ($Θ(4^{-N})$) manifolds; as fidelities concentrate, the fidelity signal-to-noise ratio at a fixed shot budget also decays exponentially in $N$; and because $\mathbb{M}_{\text{unentangled}}$ already holds $2^N$ orthogonal states, expressive, unconstrained encoders under contrastive losses reach trivial minima by geometric shattering even without entanglement. We introduce Quantum Projective Metric Learning (QPMeL), an exact $O(N)$ closed-form kernel on $\mathbb{M}_{\text{unentangled}}$ that circumvents circuit simulation. QPMeL resolves gradient collapse via a curriculum annealing from a $1$-local observable regime (restoring $Θ(1/N^2)$ polynomial variance) to the global product kernel. Empirically, QPMeL as a complete design exceeds eight and matches two of 11 published quantum few-shot designs.