Self-Correction in VLMs

GoldenViewVQA requires models to jointly answer driving-scene questions and identify the camera view containing the supporting visual evidence, making precise evidence localization as important as answer correctness. We present CoVeR-VQA, a training-free multi-stage verification and correction framework for grounded multi-view VQA. Starting from GPT-5.6 zero-shot predictions, CoVeR-VQA progressively applies view-specific verification with Gemini-3.6-Flash, prior-guided joint verification with Claude-Opus-5, and cross-split group-level verification that exploits semantically filtered question groups from shared multi-view scenes and validation-derived prior knowledge. On the official GoldenViewVQA test set, the four-stage CoVeR-VQA pipeline achieves 84.75% Joint Accuracy, improving the GPT-5.6 zero-shot baseline by 13.56 percentage points, while reaching 94.92% Answer Accuracy and 86.44% View Accuracy. The final submitted run achieves 88.14% Joint Accuracy after two additional evaluator-informed post-hoc corrections. Our analysis shows that supporting-view localization remains the primary source of residual errors, highlighting the importance of explicit evidence verification for reliable multi-view multimodal reasoning.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance in multimodal reasoning, yet they remain prone to generating plausible but incorrect answers. Self-verification offers a practical way to improve answer reliability without relying on external judges, but existing methods typically depend on a single verification criterion or fixed prompt, resulting in incomplete and unstable reliability estimates. We first systematically analyze how verifier capability and prompt design affect verification performance. Our findings show that stronger verifiers provide more reliable judgments, while verification performance is highly sensitive to prompt choice, with no single prompt consistently dominating across tasks. Guided by these findings, we propose MOTIVE, a Multi-View Self-VerificatiOn wiTh RelIability-Guided SelectiVE Rethinking framework for reliable multimodal reasoning. MOTIVE evaluates each candidate answer from complementary verification perspectives and learns a correctness-aligned reliability score through correctness-grounded multi-view verification learning. During inference, this score governs an accept-or-rethink decision, allowing reliable answers to be returned directly while uncertain ones trigger history-guided rethinking. Extensive experiments across diverse multimodal benchmarks and VLM backbones demonstrate that MOTIVE consistently outperforms strong self-verification and self-correction baselines. Further results show that reliable verification improves accept-or-rethink decisions and reduces unnecessary reasoning turns, enabling more reliable and efficient self-verification without an external judge.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) still struggle on tasks requiring complex visual understanding. We argue that the core issue is not high-level reasoning, but instead failing to locate critical details in the image. Due to this shortcoming, VLMs generate often plausible but incorrect reasoning based on flawed perceptual grounding. To address this, we propose Locator-Critic (LOCI), a training-free framework that decouples visual search from evidence verification. LOCI employs a Locator agent to propose candidate visual evidence and a separate Critic agent to evaluate its relevance and sufficiency. These agents engage in an iterative refinement loop, progressively improving the evidence until it is adequate to answer the given question. This decoupled, self-correcting process yields substantial performance gains, achieving state-of-the-art results on multiple complex visual benchmarks. LOCI improves accuracy for both open-weight models like Qwen3-VL (+12.1 on V*, +5.8 on HR-Bench and +11.2 on VisualProbe-Hard) and proprietary models like Gemini 2.5 Pro (+8.9 on V*, +4.3 on HR-Bench, +4.8 on VisualProbe-Hard).

Vision-language models (VLMs) frequently fail at visual change reasoning, even when their vision encoders contain sufficient information. We observe that correct VLM outputs tend to contain explicit verbal evidence (object names, colors, spatial locations) that supports the claimed change, while incorrect outputs often lack such evidence. We propose SAVER (Selective Auditing of Verbal Evidence for Error Recovery), a lightweight, rule-based method that parses VLM responses for this evidence and triggers structured reprompting only when evidence is missing or inconsistent. Across three change detection benchmarks and four VLMs, SAVER significantly improves accuracy on tasks where errors stem from the model failing to articulate what it saw (expression failures), with gains up to +25.8% on CLEVR-Change. The evidence patterns can also be generated by an LLM in a single call, matching the hand-tuned gate on CLEVR-Change. Ablation experiments confirm that the evidence gate, not reprompting alone, drives the improvement.

Test-time scaling offers a promising method to improve the inference performance of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) without additional training. Existing approaches to vision-language navigation (VLN) for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) typically relies on a single inference pass, which can falter in complex environments by producing suboptimal or unsafe trajectories. In this paper, we explore a simple and effective approach to apply test-time scaling to VLN for UAV. We enhance navigation reasoning through an iterative refinement process that requires no extra model training, guiding the model to re-evaluate its initial navigation plan for better accuracy and safety. Our method first prompts the model to generate multiple parallel candidates and then performs a self-correction step, achieving deeper and more robust planning without changing the underlying model. To further strengthen decision-making, we design a multi-criteria scoring function to evaluate the refined candidates based on safety, goal alignment, and forward-progress. This simple yet powerful combination enables a frozen UAV navigation VLMs to self-correct and generate more accurate and reliable flight plans, achieving SOTA performance in this task.

We introduce Self-Verified Reasoner (SVR-R1), a multi-turn RL framework that turns a model's own verification into a learning signal for multimodal reasoning. For each query, the model proposes an answer using the same weights, and issues a binary self-verdict (Yes/No). A 'No' triggers a second-chance rethink; a 'Yes,' or a turn cap, finalizes the output for computing the outcome-based reward. SVR-R1 is implemented with GRPO and an asynchronous multi-turn rollout framework and needs no external supervision or auxiliary critics. We evaluate SVR-R1 on vision-language reasoning benchmarks and show that it improves accuracy by a large margin over strong standard GRPO baselines. Training dynamics show decreasing reliance on verification-fewer verification turns, yet higher test accuracy-indicating that the gap between verification and generation narrows as the policy internalizes self-correction and chooses the most confident answer via our framework. SVR-R1 bridges the less explored intersection of inference-time self-refinement and RL training for VLMs, offering a simple yet effective recipe for bootstrapping multimodal reasoning. We will open-source SVR-R1 to facilitate future research in VLMs.

Despite strong performance on many multimodal tasks, vision-language models (VLMs) still struggle with basic object counting. We investigate whether this reflects missing internal knowledge or a gap between internal representations and verbalized outputs. Training simple probes on activations from four VLMs across five counting datasets reveals that nonlinear probes can reliably detect counting errors, suggesting that VLMs often encode the correct count even when they output the wrong answer. SVCCA analysis shows that probes trained on ground-truth counts and probes trained on model outputs occupy a partially shared activation subspace but read out along misaligned directions. We further validate our findings using a causal steering intervention, proving that strengthening the direction of count-identified probes does improve model counting performance. Motivated by this result, we propose a detector-guided self-correction method that selectively re-prompts the model only when an internal error detector predicts failure. This simple inference-time intervention improves counting accuracy by up to 15.6 absolute percentage points, without any parameter updates. Our results establish activation-based error probing as both a practical tool for improving VLM counting and a mechanistic lens on the gap between internal knowledge and model outputs.

Large vision-language models can reason over multimodal inputs by generating textual chains of thought (CoT). A key capability exhibited in CoT reasoning is self-reflection: revisiting earlier decisions and correcting previous errors. However, existing LVLMs often fail to properly attend to visual inputs during reflection, limiting their ability to translate feedback into grounded corrections, especially for out-of-distribution images. To address this issue, we propose a novel reinforcement learning training framework VRRL, with two components explicitly designed to elicit visually grounded self-reflection. First, we randomly mask trajectory prefixes during training to emphasize recovery from incorrect intermediate predictions rather than making early mistakes. Second, we introduce buffered roll-ins from an experience replay buffer to expose the model to diverse failure states that it must learn to correct. We evaluate our approach on visual grounding tasks involving tables and charts, as well as spatial navigation benchmarks. While off-the-shelf and conventionally fine-tuned models degrade substantially under distribution shift, our method substantially improves average out-of-distribution accuracy over standard RL and reflection-oriented fine-tuning baselines by using self-reflection effectively.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse multimodal tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to unreliable reasoning. Existing self-correction methods mitigate these issues but typically rely on post-training or carefully engineered feedback, incurring high computational cost. In this work, we revisit this challenge through the lens of emotional cues, asking whether they can activate latent self-correction behaviors in VLMs without additional training. We find that emotional signals serve as an effective trigger for self-correction, encouraging more cautious and reflective reasoning. Motivated by this finding, we propose \escabstract (Emotional Self-Correction), a training-free self-correction framework. ESC introduces an external verifier that detects potentially incorrect initial responses and injects emotional feedback to encourage model to reflect, and produce a better revised response without additional training. Extensive experiments across safety, hallucination, vision-centric perception, and multimodal reasoning benchmarks show that ESC consistently improves reliability while preserving overall model utility. These results suggest that emotion can function not only as an ability to be recognized, but also as a practical control signal for scalable self-correction in VLMs. We therefore believe that ESC provides a strong foundation for a new reliable human-like, emotion-integrated research direction. Our project is publicly available at \textcolor{red}{https://genai4e.github.io/ESC/}.

Letting a vision-language model (VLM) think longer at test time has driven much recent progress. A natural way to bring this to spatial grounding is visual self-correction: the model predicts a bounding box, sees it rendered on the image, and refines it over several steps. We build a faithful instance of this idea, Iterative Visual Thinking (IVT), with a two-phase recipe: a supervised warm-up in which the base model's own predictions serve as realistic errors that a teacher VLM turns into corrective reasoning traces (yielding training data without human annotation), followed by GRPO with a simple IoU reward. Measured the way such systems are usually reported, it works: the trained model surpasses the single-shot base by +2.4pp [email protected]. We show this gain is a measurement mirage. The reported number silently keeps, per sample, the trajectory step closest to the ground-truth box: an oracle that needs the very answer it predicts. Re-scored under deployable, label-free stopping rules the improvement vanishes, and the best policy is not to iterate at all: stopping at step 0 matches the base and beats every shippable rule. The cause is a verification failure, since the model can generate a better box somewhere in its trajectory but cannot identify it. Self-verification confidence correlates only weakly with correctness (r about 0.22), and a counterfactual overlay shows the loop reacts to the presence of a rendered box rather than its correctness. We distill the lesson into an honest-trajectory evaluation protocol: accuracy under fixed label-free policies plus an explicit oracle-shippable gap.

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) frequently suffer from hallucinations. Existing preference learning-based approaches largely rely on proprietary models to construct preference datasets. We identify that this reliance introduces a distributional mismatch between the proprietary and target models that hinders efficient alignment. To address this, we propose Alignment via VErified Self-correction DPO (AVES-DPO), a framework that aligns LVLMs using in-distribution data derived from the model's intrinsic knowledge. Our approach employs a consensus-based verification mechanism to diagnose diverse hallucinations and guides the model to self-correct, thereby generating preference pairs strictly compatible with its internal distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AVES-DPO surpasses existing baselines in hallucination mitigation while requiring only 5.2k samples.

Accurate transcription of handwritten mathematics is crucial for educational AI systems, yet current benchmarks fail to evaluate this capability properly. Most prior studies focus on single-line expressions and rely on lexical metrics such as BLEU, which fail to assess the semantic reasoning across multi-line student solutions. In this paper, we present the first systematic study of multi-line handwritten math Optical Character Recognition (OCR), revealing a critical failure mode of Vision-Language Models (VLMs): over-correction. Instead of faithfully transcribing a student's work, these models often "fix" errors, thereby hiding the very mistakes an educational assessment aims to detect. To address this, we propose PINK (Penalized INK-based score), a semantic evaluation metric that leverages a Large Language Model (LLM) for rubric-based grading and explicitly penalizes over-correction. Our comprehensive evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art VLMs on the FERMAT dataset reveals substantial ranking reversals compared to BLEU: models like GPT-4o are heavily penalized for aggressive over-correction, whereas Gemini 2.5 Flash emerges as the most faithful transcriber. Furthermore, human expert studies show that PINK aligns significantly better with human judgment (55.0% preference over BLEU's 39.5%), providing a more reliable evaluation framework for handwritten math OCR in educational settings.

Although Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have made substantial progress, hallucination, where generated text is not grounded in the visual input, remains a challenge. As LVLMs become stronger, previously reported hallucination patterns, such as linguistic bias and overthinking phenomenon, become far less consistent, making the corresponding mitigation techniques substantially less effective. In this paper, we introduce an Internal self-Correction mechanism utilizing Layer Attention (ICLA) that operates directly on hidden states during generation. Each layer selectively retrieves information from all preceding layers through a diagonal cross-layer attention mechanism, enabling self-refinement without any external correction signals. With introducing and training only 0.2M and 0.1M additional parameters on LLaVA1.5-7B and Qwen2.5-VL-7B, \ours consistently improves visual grounding across multiple hallucination benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness for more advanced LVLMs.

Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated significant potential on complex visual understanding tasks through iterative optimization methods.However, these models generally lack effective self-correction mechanisms, making it difficult for them to independently rectify cognitive biases. Consequently, during multi-turn revisions, they often fall into repetitive and ineffective attempts, failing to achieve stable improvements in answer quality.To address this issue, we propose a novel iterative self-correction framework that endows models with two key capabilities: Capability Reflection and Memory Reflection. This framework guides the model to first diagnose errors and generate a correction plan via Capability Reflection, then leverage Memory Reflection to review past attempts to avoid repetition and explore new solutions, and finally, optimize the answer through rigorous re-reasoning. Experiments on the challenging OCRBench v2 benchmark show that OCR-Agent outperforms the current open-source SOTA model InternVL3-8B by +2.0 on English and +1.2 on Chinese subsets, while achieving state-of-the-art results in Visual Understanding (79.9) and Reasoning (66.5) - surpassing even larger fine-tuned models. Our method demonstrates that structured, self-aware reflection can significantly enhance VLMs' reasoning robustness without additional training. Code: https://github.com/AIGeeksGroup/OCR-Agent.

In the era of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), enhancing multimodal reasoning capabilities remains a critical challenge, particularly in handling ambiguous or complex visual inputs, where initial inferences often lead to hallucinations or logic errors. Existing VLMs often produce plausible yet ungrounded answers, and even when prompted to "reflect", their corrections may remain detached from the image evidence. To address this, we propose the MIRROR framework for Multimodal Iterative Reasoning via Reflection On visual Regions. By embedding visual reflection as a core mechanism, MIRROR is formulated as a closed-loop process comprising draft, critique, region-based verification, and revision, which are repeated until the output is visually grounded. To facilitate training of this model, we construct ReflectV, a visual reflective dataset for multi-turn supervision that explicitly contains reflection triggers, region-based verification actions, and answer revision grounded in visual evidence. Experiments on both general vision-language benchmarks and representative vision-language reasoning benchmarks show that MIRROR improves correctness and reduces visual hallucinations, demonstrating the value of training reflection as an evidence-seeking, region-aware verification process rather than a purely textual revision step.