Prognostics for Autonomous Deep-Space Habitat Health Management under Multiple Unknown Failure Modes
Authors: Benjamin Peters, Ayush Mohanty, Xiaolei Fang, Stephen K. Robinson, Nagi Gebraeel
Organizations: University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA · Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA · North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA · University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Deep-space habitats (DSHs) are safety-critical systems that must operate autonomously for long periods, often beyond the reach of ground-based maintenance or expert intervention. Monitoring system health and anticipating failures are therefore essential. Prognostics based on remaining useful life (RUL) prediction support this goal by estimating how long a subsystem can operate before failure. Critical DSH subsystems, including environmental control and life support, power generation, and thermal control, are monitored by many sensors and can degrade through multiple failure modes. These failure modes are often unknown, and informative sensors may vary across modes, making accurate RUL prediction challenging when historical failure data are unlabeled. We propose an unsupervised prognostics framework for RUL prediction that jointly identifies latent failure modes and selects informative sensors using unlabeled run-to-failure data. The framework consists of two phases: an offline phase, where system failure times are modeled using a mixture of Gaussian regressions and an Expectation-Maximization algorithm to cluster degradation trajectories and select mode-specific sensors, and an online phase for real-time diagnosis and RUL prediction using low-dimensional features and a weighted functional regression model. The approach is validated on simulated DSH telemetry data and the NASA C-MAPSS benchmark, demonstrating its ability to identify unknown failure modes, select mode-specific informative sensors, and accurately predict RUL.
Figures & tables
ASGL =
Adaptive Sparse Group Lasso
CA =
Covariate-Adjusted
CES =
Complex Engineering System
C-MAPSS =
Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation
CDLL =
Complete-Data Log-Likelihood
DSH =
Deep-Space Habitat
ECLSS =
Environmental Control and Life Support System
Table 1
Figure 1: Example of a deep-space habitat with multiple subsystems. The health of each subsystem is monitored by a subset of onboard sensors. The subset of informative sensors varies for different failure modes.
Figure 2: Overview of the proposed prognostics framework for deep-space habitats
Figure 3: Case study 1 data: Signals in sensors 1, 3, 5, 19 (rows 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively) for FM 1 (blue) and FM 2 (red) under different SNRs: [2, 5], [5, 8], and [8, 11] (columns 1, 2, 3 respectively)
Figure 4: CV Error for (a) SNR [2,5], (b) SNR [5,8], and (c) SNR [8,11]
SNRpk
[2,5]
[5,8]
[8,11]
λ
0.0288
0.0288
0.0288
α
1
1
0.75
Table 2: Tuning parameter selection for Case Study 1
SNRpk
FM
Accuracy
Sensors Selected
[2, 5]
1
0.5500
1:20
2
0.9125
1:20
[5, 8]
1
0.8875
1:20
2
0.8313
1:20
[8, 11]
1
0.8375
1,3:20
2
0.8438
1:3,5:20
Table 3: MGR-ASGL performance for case study 1
SNRpk
FM 1
FM 2
Sensor ID
l2 -norm
Sensor ID
l2 -norm
5
1.464
9
1.561
[2, 5]
12
1.159
7
1.456
16
1.104
19
0.554
19
0.723
6
0.373
12
1.886
9
2.623
Table 4: l2 -norms of four most informative sensors for FM1 & FM2
Figure 5: Prediction error (in % ) for all test systems of case study 1 under three different SNRs, i.e., [2, 5], [5, 8], and [8, 11]
Figure 6: The system diagram used in Case Study 2, adapted from [ 70 ]
Sensor ID
Sensor Name
Functionality
1
T2
Total temperature at fan inlet
2
T24
Total temperature at LPC outlet
3
T30
Total temperature at HPC outlet
4
T50
Total temperature at LPT outlet
5
P2
Pressure at fan inlet
6
P15
Total pressure in bypass-duct
Table 5: Sensors used in case study 2 (C-MAPPS [ 71 ] )
Figure 7: Sensor data used for the offline step in case study 2. HPC failure (blue), Fan failures (red)
Sensor ID
2
3
4
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
17
20
21
FM 1
0.266
0.584
0.897
0
0.117
0.545
0
0
0.90
0.148
0.501
0.230
0
0.116
FM 2
0
0
0.033
0.877
0
0.291
0
1.148
0
0.119
0
0.042
0.573
0.318
Table 6: Sensor Selection for Case Study 2
Figure 8: Average Prediction error ( % ) in case study 2
Figure 9: Prediction error ( % ) for different RUL intervals in case study 2
Modern manufacturing systems often experience multiple and unpredictable failure behaviors, yet most existing prognostic models assume a fixed, known set of failure modes with labeled historical data. This assumption limits the use of digital twins for predictive maintenance, especially in high-mix or adaptive production environments, where new failure modes may emerge, and the failure mode labels may be unavailable. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Bayesian nonparametric framework that unifies a Dirichlet process mixture module for unsupervised failure mode discovery with a neural network-based prognostic module. The key innovation lies in an iterative feedback mechanism to jointly learn two modules. These modules iteratively update one another to dynamically infer, expand, or merge failure modes as new data arrive while providing high prognostic accuracy. Experiments on both simulation and aircraft engine datasets show that the proposed approach performs competitively with or significantly better than existing approaches. It also exhibits robust online adaptation capabilities, making it well-suited for digital-twin-based system health management in complex manufacturing environments.
Kani Fu, Sanduni S Disanayaka Mudiyanselage, Chunli Dai +1
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA · School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
Time-to-event modeling provides a systematic framework for estimating time-dependent failure risk, reliability, and remaining useful life (RUL) from longitudinal condition monitoring data. However, applying these models to distributed prognostics remains challenging because sensor trajectories and failure-time records are often stored across organizations or operational sites and cannot be centrally pooled due to privacy or proprietary constraints. Moreover, the classical Cox proportional hazards model relies on a nonseparable partial likelihood involving global risk sets, making direct optimization difficult under standard federated learning protocols. This paper presents a federated longitudinal-survival modeling framework for collaborative system failure prognostics. The proposed framework combines longitudinal sensor representation learning with a client-separable discrete-time hazard objective, enabling multiple clients to collaboratively train a prognostic model without sharing raw sensor measurements or individual failure records. Time-dependent representations extracted from multivariate sensor histories are used to estimate interval-specific failure hazards, reliability curves, and system RUL. Experiments on the four C-MAPSS turbofan engine degradation subsets under simulated decentralized settings demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently improves prognostic performance over isolated local training while maintaining performance comparable to centralized training across heterogeneous operating conditions and failure modes. These results demonstrate the potential of federated longitudinal-survival modeling for collaborative, data-aware condition monitoring and system failure prognostics.
Fan Yang, Madelyn Weller, Dimuthu Fernando +2
Fowler School of Engineering, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866 USA · Department of Statistics, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401 USA
Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction and failure-mode classification are central tasks in predictive maintenance. Many data-driven pipelines use fixed-window supervised learning with complete terminal labels; such routes do not naturally encode the temporal recursion linking successive degradation-state predictions when observations are partial or unit identities are unavailable. We formulate prognostics as vector General Value Function (GVF) prediction on an absorbing degradation process, treating RUL and failure-mode probabilities as temporally consistent targets rather than independent window-level labels, and estimate them with a multi-step temporal-difference estimator, TD(n,λ). Supporting theory identifies the Bellman fixed point of the vector GVFs, characterizes the linear projected-TD limit and its relation to complete-return Monte Carlo regression under realizability, and explains when bootstrapped TD targets are less variable than Monte Carlo returns. On an event-triggered multimode simulation and NASA C-MAPSS label-scarce stitch data, TD improves RUL and failure-mode prediction relative to a supervised same-backbone Monte Carlo control, especially under scarce complete labels. Practically, fragmented, identity-free degradation records can contribute local Bellman transitions instead of being discarded until complete run-to-failure labels are available.
Hao Yan, Ali Sarabi, Qing Zou +1
School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University