cs.AIFeb 2, 2025

Inferring the Unspoken: Aligning Embodied Agents with Implicit Preferences

Authors: Manjie Xu, Xinyi Yang, Wei Liang, Chi Zhang, Yixin Zhu

Abstract

Natural-language instructions rarely specify every detail required for embodied action. An agent asked to ``prepare an apple,'' for example, must still determine whether to wash or cut it, where to place it, and in what order to perform these actions. Such decisions often reflect user-specific preferences that are demonstrated through behavior but never explicitly stated. We study whether embodied agents can infer these latent preferences from a small number of prior demonstrations and apply them when planning in new situations. To support systematic evaluation, we introduce Preference-based Planning (PbP), a benchmark containing 5,000 evaluation groups and 290 preferences organized into three levels: atomic action parameters, strategic interaction and placement policies, and temporal ordering constraints. We further propose Inferring the Unspoken (InTU), a two-stage framework that first verbalizes the preference inferred from multimodal behavioral demonstrations and then generates an action plan conditioned on that explicit representation. Experiments with video-language and language models reveal a substantial preference-acquisition gap: models plan effectively when given the ground-truth preference, but their performance degrades sharply when the same preference must be inferred from behavior. Explicit verbalization consistently improves alignment over direct end-to-end planning, particularly for strong multimodal models, and provides greater robustness when preferences must transfer across visually distinct scenes. These results identify visual-to-semantic preference acquisition, rather than preference-conditioned planning alone, as a central bottleneck in personalized embodied intelligence. They also demonstrate that language can serve as an interpretable and transferable intermediate representation between observed behavior and personalized action.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Sep 15, 2026cs.RO

World Models for Embodied Intelligence: From Plausible to Controllable to Actionable

World models connect perception and decision-making in embodied intelligence by maintaining hidden state, anticipating consequences, comparing interventions, and adapting when execution departs from expectations. Although progress is often measured by visual fidelity, their value lies in improving behavior. Before reaching for a cup, a person anticipates its weight and resistance to grasping, shaping the hand before contact. Such anticipation is coarse and rarely pictorial, yet it guides action. This raises a central question: which predictive capabilities improve behavior? Existing surveys, organized by architecture, output modality, or application domain, leave this question implicit. We introduce three progressively stronger capability levels: Plausible models preserve task-relevant temporal, geometric, or physical structure; Controllable models additionally predict how interventions alter that structure; and Actionable models translate predictions into measurable gains in planning, action, learning, evaluation, verification, recovery, or data selection. We complement this hierarchy with a 3 x 4 matrix crossing geometry, physics, and action grounding with improvement loops centered on data, rewards, policies, and the model itself. Using this framework, we survey manipulation, navigation, locomotion, autonomous driving, and general embodied learning, tracing technical progressions, clarifying capability requirements, and examining datasets, benchmarks, and evaluation protocols. We identify challenges in long-horizon consistency, uncertainty calibration, causal intervention testing, latency, verification and recovery, and cross-embodiment transfer. This perspective shifts evaluation from visual plausibility toward whether predictions capture task-relevant state, reflect intervention effects, and improve the closed-loop behavior of embodied agents.
Nanjie Yao, Hao Wang, Chong Cheng +10
Embodied Artificial IntelligenceInverse Dynamics
AskPDF
Jun 12, 2026cs.RO

TacStyle: Personalizing Tactile Robot Policies using Structured Behavior Representations

Robotic systems that assist humans should be capable of adapting their behaviors to individual user preferences. For instance, users may want a robot arm to adjust the amount of force it applies while folding their laundry or cleaning furniture. Natural language provides an intuitive way for humans to communicate such preferences. Recent progress in language-conditioned robot policies has shown that robots can successfully use language prompts to determine what task to perform. However, extending the same approach to realize how the task should be performed requires detailed labels describing the preferences or styles of trajectories in the task data. Not only is collecting such annotations challenging, but conditioning directly on these labels may also fail to provide fine-grained control over a continuous range of behaviors. For example, it can be difficult to convey the exact force that a robot must apply through abstract instructions like "apply a bit more pressure than before". Therefore, in this work, we propose using language to reason over preferred behaviors instead of directly generating them. We first learn a structured latent representation that organizes user preferences according to differences in the corresponding trajectories. Then, given a preference prompt, we use a foundation model to interpret this latent space and choose a value that produces the desired behavior. Through both simulation and real-world experiments, we show that selecting robot behaviors from an intuitively structured latent space enables more precise adaptation to user preferences while requiring significantly fewer preference labels than language-conditioned policies.
Kevin Robledo, Matías I. Torres Galaz, Kumar Dixhant Rai +3
Robot PoliciesBehavioral Foundation ModelsRobotsAI Behavior AnalysisNatural LanguageLatent Space
AskPDF
Jun 1, 2026cs.AI

Token Predictors Are Not Planners: Building Physically Grounded Causal Reasoners

Current benchmarks for embodied vision-language planning often favor linguistic next-token prediction over physically grounded next-state reasoning. This rewards models that mimic statistical language priors rather than track causal dependencies, reducing physical planning to shallow sequence modeling. We argue that reliable physical autonomy requires a shift from linguistically grounded token prediction toward physically grounded causal reasoning. To this end, we introduce Causal-Plan-Bench, a high-fidelity diagnostic suite curated through multi-stage verification to evaluate embodied planning across four causal dimensions. We also construct Causal-Plan-1M, a million-scale corpus of explicit reasoning traces produced by a four-stage annotation pipeline over egocentric videos. Extensive evaluation shows that leading models still struggle to demonstrate genuine physical agency, with Gemini 3 Pro reaching only 38.18 on our benchmark. In contrast, our training recipe enables Causal Planner, built on Qwen3-VL-8B, to internalize physical logic for more accurate next-state estimation. The model achieves strong in-domain performance and cross-benchmark generalization, and reveals a Causal Scaling Law: scaling causal training data to one million instances yields a 36.3% relative gain, from 33.22 to 45.28. Overall, our work provides a concrete step toward turning agents from superficial token predictors into physically grounded causal reasoners.
Zheng Lu, Mingqi Gao, Qinlei Xie +8
Embodied Artificial IntelligenceAction-Conditioned PredictionVision-Language Model ReasoningAgentic ReasoningPlannerCausal Structure and Reasoning
AskPDF