Data-Driven Maintenance Optimization: Aligning Prognostic Learning with Decision Objective

Predictive maintenance requires reliable remaining useful life (RUL) estimation. Existing methods mainly follow two paradigms: wear-based aging models that capture cumulative degradation and sensor-driven data models that reflect instantaneous health conditions, each providing only partial information. In this work, we propose a probabilistic fusion framework that integrates wear-based and sensor-based prognostic components through failure probability distributions. Based on explicit structural assumptions linking wear, latent health, sensor observations, and failure, we derive a principled combination rule that enables uncertainty-aware integration with adaptive weighting of the components. Experimentally, we assess this combination rule by learning the wear-based component using a parametric survival model and the sensor-based component using a 1D convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) with a post-hoc uncertainty model. Evaluation on multiple N-CMAPSS datasets demonstrates that the fused model improves point accuracy, preserves the C-index, and produces narrower yet well-calibrated prediction intervals compared to either component alone. The results highlight the complementary roles of wear-based survival model and sensor-based deep learning model, and show that their probabilistic integration provides a structured pathway toward more robust and consistent prognostics over the life-time.

Engine Health Management (EHM) depends on reliable forecasting of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) and on tracking thermal indicators such as turbine gas temperature (TGT). In practice, real-world fleet data are heterogeneous and non-stationary, and point predictions alone are insufficient for risk-aware maintenance decisions. This paper presents a multi-task scientific machine learning framework for turbine prognostics that jointly predicts turbine gas temperature untrimmed (TGTU), Delta Turbine Gas Temperature (DTGT), and RUL, with quantified uncertainty in the form of prediction intervals whose empirical coverage is evaluated. A shared sequence encoder (convolutional front-end with residual bidirectional LSTM layers and attention pooling) feeds task-specific heads, including mean--variance estimation for probabilistic regression and, optionally, a survival head for threshold-based event modeling. The framework is designed to be tunable via a small set of practitioner-facing parameters (e.g., DTGT thresholding rules and RUL target construction) so that deployment can align with in-house policies and proprietary criteria. The predictive performance of the proposed framework is evaluated using both point and interval metrics, including mean absolute error (MAE), prediction interval coverage probability (PICP), mean prediction interval width (MPIW), and the coverage--width criterion (CWC). Results are reported both in aggregate and stratified by flight phase and maintenance segment to highlight operational-context effects and to support uncertainty-aware monitoring.

Data-driven remaining useful life (RUL) prediction requires complete degradation trajectories for training, yet such run-to-failure data are scarce and expensive. Practitioners currently lack principled guidance on how many failure examples suffice for a given model and accuracy target. This paper develops a sample complexity framework for RUL prediction comprising seven main results organised around three themes. First, we establish fundamental learning rates: a distribution-free generalization bound shows that the uniform deviation of the mean squared error decreases as $O(B^{2}\sqrt{p/n})$, where $p$ is the model complexity and $n$ the number of trajectories, and a minimax lower bound proves that the $Θ(p/n)$ rate is unimprovable.} \rev{Second, we quantify how domain knowledge accelerates learning: incorporating degradation physics reduces data requirements by up to two orders of magnitude for deep networks, a Bernstein-type analysis achieves the minimax-optimal $O(p/n)$ rate under high signal-to-noise conditions, and closed-form penalties reveal when an incorrectly assumed physics model hurts rather than helps. Third, we characterise the impact of data quality: fleet variability induces an irreducible bias$-$variance tradeoff, while right-censored observations suffer an efficiency loss that depends critically on the degradation class.} Closed-form expressions are provided for exponential, power-law, and stretched-exponential degradation. \rev{Cross-domain validation against published turbofan, battery, and bearing benchmarks confirms the theoretical predictions within a factor of 2$-$3 on average. The results yield practical guidelines for planning data collection, selecting model complexity, and evaluating physics model assumptions in prognostics applications.