cs.LGSep 22, 2025

SingLEM: Single-Channel Large EEG Model

Authors: Jamiyan Sukhbaatar, Satoshi Imamura, Ibuki Inoue, Shoya Murakami, Kazi Mahmudul Hassan, Seungwoo Han, Ingon Chanpornpakdi, Toshihisa Tanaka

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Current deep learning models for electroencephalography (EEG) are often task-specific and depend on large labeled datasets, limiting their adaptability. Although EEG foundation models seek broader applicability, many still rely on predefined multi-channel inputs, electrode-layout assumptions, or model-specific channel handling. To address these limitations, we introduce the Single-Channel Large EEG Model (SingLEM), a self-supervised foundation model whose hybrid convolutional--Transformer encoder maps each channel independently to a reusable representation capturing local and long-range temporal structure. These representations can be used individually or combined through channel-wise feature concatenation. We assembled 71 public EEG datasets comprising approximately 9,200 subjects and 357,000 single-channel hours. For leakage-controlled evaluation, downstream results were obtained with a model pretrained on 68 datasets after excluding the three source datasets underlying the six tasks. A model pretrained on all 71 datasets is provided for general reuse. Across six motor imagery and cognitive tasks under strict leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) evaluation, the leakage-controlled model with concatenated representations and a support vector machine (SVM) classifier achieved the best overall performance among the compared pretrained and classical feature-based methods. Additional classifier and subject-adapted analyses supported the robustness of its representations. These findings support single-channel self-supervised learning as a montage-flexible foundation for reusable EEG feature extraction and electrode-level spatial analysis. The source code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/ttlabtuat/SingLEM.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jul 23, 2026cs.AI

MSBraM: A Multi-scale Self-supervised Brain Foundation Model for Hierarchical EEG Dynamics Learning

Self-supervised foundation models have recently shown strong potential for electroencephalogram (EEG)-based analysis. However, existing approaches struggle to capture the inherently multi-scale temporal structure of EEG signals, where local neural patterns and long-range dependencies jointly encode task-relevant information. This limitation hampers cross-scale representation learning and generalization across diverse downstream tasks. To address this challenge, we propose MSBraM, a Multi-Scale self-supervised Brain foundation Model designed to learn hierarchical EEG representations. MSBraM follows a two-stage pretraining framework. First, a multi-scale neural tokenizer discretizes raw EEG signals into semantic codes at different temporal resolutions via vector-quantized reconstruction. Second, the model is pretrained to predict masked codes using a curriculum multi-scale masking strategy, progressively integrating fine-grained local patterns with global temporal context. We pretrain MSBraM on over 2,400 hours of EEG data and evaluate it across 10 downstream tasks on 12 public datasets. Extensive experiments show that MSBraM achieves superior performance on other state-of-the-art pretrained models, demonstrating strong generalization and transferability. These results indicate that explicitly modeling multi-scale temporal dynamics is critical for effective EEG foundation models.
Tao Zhou, Jing Han, Lingyu Shu +1
Electroencephalography Foundation ModelsElectroencephalography Spatial Super-ResolutionMultiscale
AskPDF
May 12, 2026cs.AI

What Do EEG Foundation Models Capture from Human Brain Signals?

Clinical electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis rests on a hand-crafted feature catalog refined over decades, \emph{e.g.,} band power, connectivity, complexity, and more. Modern EEG foundation models bypass this catalog, learn directly from raw signals via self-supervised pretraining, and match or outperform feature-engineered baselines on most clinical benchmarks. Whether the two representations align is an open question, which we decompose into three sub-questions: \emph{what does the model learn}, \emph{what does the model use}, and \emph{how much can be explained}. We answer them with layer-wise ridge probing, LEACE-style cross-covariance subspace erasure, and a transparent classifier benchmarked against a random-feature baseline. The audit covers three foundation models (CSBrain, CBraMod, LaBraM), five clinical tasks (MDD, Stress, ISRUC-Sleep, TUSL, Siena), and a 6-family 63-feature lexicon. Of the 945945 (model, task, feature) units, 648648 (68.6%68.6\%) are representation-causal and 199199 (21.1%21.1\%) are encoded-only. Across tasks, 5050 features qualify as universal candidates with strong support (all three architectures RC) in two or more tasks. Frequency-domain features dominate, but the other five families each contribute substantial causal mass. Confirmed features recover, on average, 79.3%79.3\% of the foundation model's advantage over the random baseline, with a clean task gradient (MDD ≈0.99\approx 0.99 down to Stress ≈0.56\approx 0.56): tasks near ceiling are almost fully recovered by the lexicon, while harder tasks leave a non-trivial residual that pinpoints a concrete target for future concept discovery.
Ling Tang, Qian Chen, Jilin Mei +6
Electroencephalography Foundation ModelsElectroencephalography Spatial Super-ResolutionElectronic Health Record Foundation ModelsWireless Foundation ModelsBrainFoundation Model
AskPDF
Apr 25, 2026cs.LG

Channel Adaptation for EEG Foundation Models: A Systematic Benchmark Across Architectures, Tasks, and Training Regimes

Scaling EEG foundation models requires pooling data across heterogeneous electrode montages, a prerequisite both for larger pretraining corpora and for downstream deployment. We present the first systematic comparison of four channel adaptation methods (Conv1d projection, spherical spline interpolation (SSI), source-space decomposition, and Riemannian re-centering) across five pretrained EEG foundation models (5M--157M parameters), five downstream tasks, and two training regimes with 10--15 random seeds each. We find that rigid-montage models (BENDR, Neuro-GPT) require external adaptation, while flexible models (EEGPT, CBraMod) match or exceed it natively when fine-tuned but benefit from external methods under frozen-encoder deployment. A probe-SFT asymmetry exists: external adaptation can cause severe negative transfer during fine-tuning of flexible models. The optimal method is architecture-dependent (Conv1d for BENDR, SSI/Riemannian for Neuro-GPT, source-space decomposition for depression detection), and 5M-parameter CBraMod outperforms models up to 31×\times larger on 4/5 datasets, consistent with independent findings that compact EEG-specific architectures can match larger models.
Kuntal Kokate, Bruno Aristimunha, Dung Truong +1
Electroencephalography Foundation ModelsParameter-Efficient AdaptationWireless Foundation ModelsFrozen Encoder
AskPDF