Temperature Scaling Attack Disrupting Model Confidence in Federated Learning

Federated learning (FL) avoids explicit data exposure by keeping raw data on local clients, yet privacy risks remain in the training process and the learned model itself. Recently, centralized Taking Away Training Data (TATD) attacks have shown that malicious training could abuse the memorization capacity of deep models to store and later recover training data. However, this memorization-based threat has not been systematically studied under FL environments, where multi-client averaging could overwrite encoded training data. In this paper, we study a white-box TATD attack in which a malicious server selects n target clients from K participating clients and actively writes private training data into the global model during federated training. We propose FedCVESA, a federated variant of Correlation Value Encoding Attack (CVEA), by adding a Pearson-correlation regularizer to the loss function of target clients, so that private training data are gradually encoded into selected model parameters, referred to as carrier parameters. To reduce the overwriting of carrier parameters during server aggregation, we further propose segmented aggregation over dispersed carrier parameters, preserving selected carrier parameters while keeping standard averaging on the remaining parameters. Experiments on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 under Dirichlet non-IID partitions show that the proposed method can steal semantically meaningful private training images from the trained model while maintaining acceptable main-task utility in a controlled proof-of-concept setting. These results demonstrate that FL can become a parameter-level memorization channel for active TATD attack under the studied white-box malicious-server setting.

Horizontal federated learning (HFL) backdoor audits often summarize model behavior through clean accuracy (CA), mean attack success rate (ASR), or a single known-trigger test. Such summaries can hide a different failure mode, in which one target label is activated by many trigger realizations. We study this failure mode with FLAT, a latent-conditioned reliability stress test for HFL backdoors. In FLAT, compromised clients still submit ordinary classifier updates to the server, while an attacker-side generator $G(x,t,z)$ separates target intent $t$ from trigger realization $z$. This separation shifts the audit question from whether one known trigger succeeds to how the hidden behavior varies across targets, latent samples, defenses, and post-stop rounds. On CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet, FLAT preserves clean utility while reaching 99.49%, 99.66%, and 94.10% single-target FedAvg ASR. The evaluation also reveals non-uniform defense responses, where a server rule can suppress one target mode while leaving another active. These observations motivate HFL backdoor audits that report target-wise ASR, worst-target ASR, target coverage, latent-sampled behavior, post-stop persistence, and defense response.

Federated Learning remains highly susceptible to backdoor attacks--malicious clients inject targeted behaviours into the global model. Existing defenses suffer from substantial false-positive rates under realistic non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data, incorrectly flagging benign clients and degrading model accuracy even when adversaries are correctly identified. We present FedSurrogate, a novel backdoor defense that addresses this limitation by combining bidirectional gradient alignment filtering with layer-adaptive anomaly detection. FedSurrogate performs selective clustering on security-critical layers identified via directional divergence analysis, concentrating the detection signal on a low-dimensional subspace. A bidirectional soft-filtering stage screens trusted clients for residual contamination while rescuing false positives from suspects, substantially reducing misclassifications under heterogeneous conditions. Rather than removing confirmed malicious updates, FedSurrogate replaces them with downscaled surrogate updates from structurally similar benign clients, preserving gradient diversity while neutralising adversarial influence. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that FedSurrogate maintains false-positive rates below 10% across all datasets and attack types, compared to 31-32% for the nearest comparably effective baseline, while achieving superior main-task accuracy and maintaining attack success rates below 2.1% across all tested datasets and attack types under challenging non-IID settings.