Making Large Language Models Speak Tulu: Structured Prompting for an Extremely Low-Resource Language

The rapid proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created a profound digital divide, effectively excluding indigenous languages of the Global South from the AI revolution. The Tharu language, an Indo-Aryan vernacular spoken by approximately 1.7 million people across the Terai belt of Nepal and India, exemplifies this crisis. Despite a rich oral tradition, Tharu suffers from severe data scarcity and linguistic fragmentation, causing state-of-the-art multilingual models to routinely "hallucinate" or default to dominant high-resource neighbors like Hindi and Nepali due to contamination in pre-training corpora. This paper presents Tharu-LLaMA (3B), a specialized instruction-following model designed to address this exclusion. We introduce TharuChat, a novel dataset constructed via a LLM-to-Human bootstrapping pipeline. We utilized prompt-engineered Gemini models, fed with Rana Tharu grammar and folklore, to synthesize training data. Unlike curated gold-standard corpora, TharuChat reflects the noisy, heterogeneous linguistic reality of the region: it is predominantly anchored in Rana Tharu (~70%) while integrating elements of Dangaura and Kochila dialects. We provide a transparent analysis of the dataset's limitations, including dialectal code-mixing and residual Awadhi/Hindi influence. Through a rigorous empirical ablation study, we demonstrate that despite these imperfections, small-scale synthetic data is highly effective, increasing the dataset volume from 25% to 100% results in a linear reduction in perplexity from 6.42 to 2.88. The resulting model serves as a proof-of-concept for the preservation of under-resourced Himalayan languages via generative AI, achievable on consumer-grade hardware.

Large language models (LLMs) are trained on data contributed by low-resource language communities, yet the linguistic knowledge encoded in these models remains accessible only through commercial APIs. This paper investigates whether strategic prompting can extract usable text data from LLMs for two West African languages: Hausa (Afroasiatic, approximately 80 million speakers) and Fongbe (Niger-Congo, approximately 2 million speakers). We systematically compare six elicitation task types across two commercial LLMs (GPT-4o Mini and Gemini 2.5 Flash). GPT-4o Mini extracts 6-41 times more usable target-language words per API call than Gemini. Optimal strategies differ by language: Hausa benefits from functional text and dialogue, while Fongbe requires constrained generation prompts. We release all generated corpora and code.

Constructed languages (conlangs) are intentionally created human languages with a rich tradition of linguistic creativity. Despite their potential for studying language learning in large language models (LLMs), existing conlangs remain largely underexplored in LLM research. We present ConlangBench, the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating and training LLMs on 21 existing conlangs. We collect over 21M conlang-English parallel sentence pairs (including 430K pairs across the 20 non-Esperanto conlangs) and 321K vocabulary entries. In bidirectional translation experiments, we find that models perform better on a posteriori conlangs, whose vocabularies are derived from natural languages, reflecting the design characteristics of conlangs. Training on ConlangBench also shows that models can learn all eight conlangs for which sufficient parallel corpora are available, while their learning curves vary depending on how the conlangs were created. Our findings suggest that conlangs provide a unique testbed for investigating how LLMs acquire low-resource languages.