Under-resourced studies of under-resourced languages: lemmatization and POS-tagging with LLM annotators for historical Armenian, Georgian, Greek and Syriac
Organizations: CJM, LIPN · LIPN, CNRS UMR 7030, France · École nationale des chartes, Université Paris-Sciences-et-Lettres (PSL), France · UCL · Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium · PSL, CJM
Low-resource languages pose persistent challenges for Natural Language Processing tasks such as lemmatization and part-of-speech (POS) tagging. This paper investigates the capacity of recent large language models (LLMs), including GPT-4 variants and open-weight Mistral models, to address these tasks in few-shot and zero-shot settings for four historically and linguistically diverse under-resourced languages: Ancient Greek, Classical Armenian, Old Georgian, and Syriac. Using a novel benchmark comprising aligned training and out-of-domain test corpora, we evaluate the performance of foundation models across lemmatization and POS-tagging, and compare them with PIE, a task-specific RNN baseline. Our results demonstrate that LLMs, even without fine-tuning, achieve competitive or superior performance in POS-tagging and lemmatization across most languages in few-shot settings. Significant challenges persist for languages characterized by complex morphology and non-Latin scripts, but we demonstrate that LLMs are a credible and relevant option for initiating linguistic annotation tasks in the absence of data, serving as an effective aid for annotation.
Figures & tables
Training Corpus
Test Corpus
Greek
John Anagnostes, De Thessalonica Capta (15th c. AD - historiography)
Gregory of Nazianzus, Homily 1. In Sanctum Pascha (4th c. AD - patristics, homiletic)
Armenian
Evagrius, Letters (13th c. AD - epistolography, ascetism)
Step’anos of Siwnik’ (Dub.), The Genesis Commentary (8th-9th c. AD - exegesis, theology)
Georgian
Anonymus, Conversion of the Kartli (5th-9th c. AD - hagiography, historiography)
History of the Rechabites by Zosimus (8th-10th c. AD - hagiography, historiography)
Syriac
Jacob of Serugh, Homilies (5th-6th c. AD - patristics, homiletic)
History of the Rechabites by Zosimus (Long Version) (4th c. AD - hagiography, pseudepigraphs)
Table 1: Overview of training and test corpora: chronological and genre diversity.
Figure 1: Annotation guidelines and tagset for Greek, Armenian, Georgian and Syriac, using @ to split agglutinated and polylexical forms
Train
Test (In)
Test (Out)
Lang
Poly.
Simple
Poly.
Simple
Poly.
Simple
GRC
13
4705
2
298
1
301
HYE
669
4043
56
244
55
259
KAT
156
4551
5
295
5
300
SYC
1696
2296
144
156
140
161
Table 2: Distribution of polylexical vs. simple forms across datasets.
Component / Parameter
Configuration
Encoder Architecture
2-layer Bi-directional GRU
Hidden Size
300
Char Embeddings
300 (2-layer RNN)
Word Embeddings
0 (Disabled)
Lemma Decoder
Attentional (Character-level)
POS Decoder
CRF (Conditional Random Field)
Table 3: Hyperparameter configuration for the PIE supervised baseline.
Figure 3: Out-of-domain accuracy for lemmatization and POS tagging across our four historical languages: comparing the supervised PIE baseline with best open-weight and closed LLM annotators; values report maximum accuracy by task and language.
Lang
Lemma Overlap (%)
Top 3 POS (Test Set)
Polylexical (@) %
Type
Token
Train
Test
GRC
47.6
62.9
V (17.9%), N+Com (17.5%), I+Part (16.2%)
0.3
0.3
HYE
52.7
67.2
V (18.8%), I+Conj (17.8%), N+Com (15.6%)
14.2
17.5
SYC
43.4
42.2
NOUN (15.6%), PART@NOUN (14.6%), ADJ (11.3%)
42.5
46.5
KAT
62.9
76.4
N+Com (22.3%), V+Mas (20.3%), I+Conj (17.4%)
3.3
1.6
Table 4: Lexical overlap, dominant POS distributions, and density of polylexical forms across languages.
Figure 4: Figure 4. Accuracy as a function of the number of in-context examples (0, 5, 50, 500 shots) for lemmatization and POS tagging, reported separately for each language (GRC, HYE, KAT, SYC). Solid lines show the model accuracy at each shot count; shaded bands span the two evaluation conditions and thus indicate the range between in-domain and out-of-domain accuracies at the same shot count. Dashed horizontal lines mark the supervised PIE reference accuracies obtained with 1,000 and 5,000 training examples.
Bavarian Academy of Sciences (BAdW), Munich, Germany · Department of Statistics, LMU Munich, Germany · Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), LMU Munich, Germany