"It's like a pet...but my pet doesn't collect data about me": Multi-person Households' Privacy Design Preferences for Household Robots
Organizations: University of Wisconsin–Madison · Koç University Istanbul
Abstract
Household robots boasting mobility, more sophisticated sensors, and powerful processing models have become increasingly prevalent in the commercial market. However, these features may expose users to unwanted privacy risks, including unsolicited data collection and unauthorized data sharing. While security and privacy researchers thus far have explored people's privacy concerns around household robots, literature investigating people's preferred privacy designs and mitigation strategies is still limited. Additionally, the existing literature has not yet accounted for multi-user perspectives on privacy design and household robots. We aimed to fill this gap by conducting in-person participatory design sessions with 15 households to explore how they would design a privacy-aware household robot based on their concerns and expectations. We found that participants did not trust that robots, or their respective manufacturers, would respect the data privacy of household members or operate in a multi-user ecosystem without jeopardizing users' personal data. Based on these concerns, they generated designs that gave them authority over their data, contained accessible controls and notification systems, and could be customized and tailored to suit the needs and preferences of each user over time. We synthesize our findings into actionable design recommendations for robot manufacturers and developers.
Figures & tables
| HID | PID | Rel. | Age | Gender | Race | Edu. | Income |
| 1 | 1_1 | n/a | 32 | Woman | White | Doctoral | 80-89k |
| 1_2 | Partner | 36 | Man | Other | Doctoral | ||
| 2 | 2_1 | n/a | 31 | Woman | White | Master’s | 60-69k |
| 2_2 | Partner | 29 | Man | prefer not to say | Master’s | ||
| 3 | 3_1 | n/a | 50 | Man | White | Master’s | 100-149k |
| 3_2 | Child | 21 | Man | White | Some college |
| Thematic Group | Category | Examples of User Suggestions |
|---|---|---|
| Private Space | Area-specific limitations | Ask for permission to enter specific areas; Do not collect data afar for red zone; Hold still at charging location; Predetermined pathways; Only allow recording in specific areas; Turn away from ‘yellow’ areas. |
| Time-specific limitations | Only function during specific time; Only collect data during specific times; Set ‘active’ period. | |
| Safety spots and homebases | User-requested Relocation; Send away to different location; Stationed in common area; Multiple homebases for convenience. | |
| Privacy within and Beyond Family | Visual/Audio/Haptic Recognition | Biometric recognition and-or activation; Facial or Voice Recognition; Scan the room for users or situations before functioning; Biometric. |
| Protections between users | Profiles for different users; Allow users to set password for accessing information; Notify only relevant user; Notify on another device (do not show on screen); Notify when other user is accessing camera; Vague notifications; Log user access to Temi’s data; Only share data with authorized user. | |
| Outsider access | Share data only with family; Do not record or interact with non-household members; Guest Mode. |
Robotics
Robotics studies the design and control of machines that perceive, move, and act in physical environments.
See all 751 papers