Unmasking the Factual-Conceptual Gap in Persian Language Models

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing the cultural competence of large language models (LLMs) in Persian. Existing Persian cultural benchmarks rely predominantly on multiple-choice formats and English-centric metrics that fail to capture Persian's morphological complexity and semantic nuance. Our framework introduces a Persian-specific short-answer evaluation that combines rule-based morphological normalization with a hybrid syntactic and semantic similarity module, enabling robust soft-match scoring beyond exact string overlap. Through systematic evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art open- and closed-source models across three culturally grounded Persian datasets, we demonstrate that our hybrid evaluation improves scoring consistency by +10 compared to exact-match baselines by capturing meaning that surface-level methods cannot detect. Our human evaluation further confirms that the proposed semantic similarity metric achieves higher agreement with human judgments than LLM-based judges. We publicly release our evaluation framework, providing the first standardized benchmark for measuring cultural understanding in Persian and establishing a reproducible foundation for cross-cultural LLM evaluation research.

In recent years, multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) have become an inseparable part of daily life, making it crucial for them to master the rules of conversational language in order to communicate effectively with users. While previous work has evaluated LLMs' understanding of figurative language in high-resource languages, their performance in low-resource languages remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce MasalBench, a comprehensive benchmark for assessing LLMs' contextual and cross-cultural understanding of Persian proverbs, which are a key component of conversation in this low-resource language. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art LLMs on MasalBench and find that they perform well in identifying Persian proverbs in context, achieving accuracies above 0.90. However, their performance drops considerably when tasked with identifying equivalent English proverbs, with the best model achieving 0.79 accuracy. Our findings highlight the limitations of current LLMs in cultural knowledge and analogical reasoning, and they provide a framework for assessing cross-cultural understanding in other low-resource languages. MasalBench is available at https://github.com/kalhorghazal/MasalBench.

Despite impressive multilingual capabilities, large language models (LLMs) remain poorly evaluated on literary knowledge in non-English languages. We introduce PersLitEval, a benchmark of 4,514 Persian literature multiple-choice questions across eight fine-grained categories spanning spelling, literary devices, grammar, vocabulary, word formation, and conceptual understanding, sourced from materials for the Konkur university entrance examination. We evaluate six LLMs across ten prompting strategies, revealing striking category-level disparities across three tiers of task difficulty: models reach higher accuracy on conceptual similarity tasks but struggle with formal linguistic analysis, with spelling and word formation proving the hardest across all models. Prompting strategy has a significant impact on performance, with explained few-shot examples yielding the best results, particularly on formal linguistic categories. An error analysis identifies three failure modes: semantic comprehension gaps, formal linguistic knowledge gaps, and counting/enumeration errors, suggesting that different categories require different improvement strategies.