Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA · Applied Math and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA · Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA · Department of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
Accessibility forums and, more recently, generative AI tools have become vital resources for blind users seeking solutions to computer-interaction issues and learning about new assistive technologies, screen reader features, tutorials, and software updates. Understanding user experiences with these resources is essential for identifying and addressing persistent support gaps. Towards this, we interviewed 14 blind users who regularly engage with forums and GenAI tools. Findings revealed that forums often overwhelm users with multiple overlapping topics, redundant or irrelevant content, and fragmented responses that must be mentally pieced together, increasing cognitive load. GenAI tools, while offering more direct assistance, introduce new barriers by producing unreliable answers, including overly verbose or fragmented guidance, fabricated information, and contradictory suggestions that fail to follow prompts, thereby heightening verification demands. Based on these insights, we outlined design opportunities to improve the reliability of assistive resources, aiming to provide blind users with more trustworthy and cognitively-manageable support.
Department of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA · Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA · Applied Math and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA +1