Scout-Rover cooperation: online terrain strength mapping and traversal risk estimation for planetary-analog explorations
Authors: Shipeng Liu, J. Diego Caporale, Yifeng Zhang, Xingjue Liao, William Hoganson, Wilson Hu, Shivangi Misra, Neha Peddinti, +12 more
Organizations: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. · University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. · NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA. · Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. · NASA Ames Research Center
Robot-aided exploration of planetary surfaces is essential for understanding geologic processes, yet many scientifically valuable regions, such as Martian dunes and lunar craters, remain hazardous due to loose, deformable regolith. We present a scout-rover cooperation framework that expands safe access to such terrain using a hybrid team of legged and wheeled robots. In our approach, a high-mobility legged robot serves as a mobile scout, using proprioceptive leg-terrain interactions to estimate regolith strength during locomotion and construct spatially resolved terrain maps. These maps are integrated with rover locomotion models to estimate traversal risk and inform path planning. We validate the framework through analogue missions at the NASA Ames Lunar Simulant Testbed and the White Sands Dune Field. Experiments demonstrate (1) online terrain strength mapping from legged locomotion and (2) rover-specific traversal-risk estimation enabling safe navigation to scientific targets. Results show that scout-generated terrain maps reliably capture spatial variability and predict mobility failure modes, allowing risk-aware path planning that avoids hazardous regions. By combining embodied terrain sensing with heterogeneous rover cooperation, this framework enhances operational robustness and expands the reachable science workspace in deformable planetary environments.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Heterogeneous robot team framework for terrain-aware planetary exploration. (A) A legged scout robot estimates terrain properties using proprioception every step. (B) The terrain properties are used to generate terrain strength and uncertainty maps via kriging. (C) Robot-specific terradynamics models are used to estimate traversal risk for RHex rover and wheeled rover with different morphology and sensing payloads. (D) A central planner assigns mission goals and traversal path based on scientific targets and terrain strength maps, ensuring safe operation.
Figure 2: Experimental setup for terrain-aware legged robot scouting. (A) Experiment site, the SSERVI Regolith Lab testbed located at the NASA Ames Research Center. (B–D) Three terrain-preparation protocols with strength from high to low: tamped (high strength), raked (medium strength), and sifted (low strength). (E)(F) The desired terrain strength map, prepared using the three protocols. (G) Ground truth terrain strength measurements are collected using a robotic penetrometer across the testbed. (H) A legged scout robot performs terrain scouting using proprioception from every step along its path. (I) LiDAR scan after terrain preparation. (J) Penetration resistance measurements from the robotic penetrometer across the testbed. (K) The penetration resistance distribution from terrain grid cells prepared using the three protocols.
Figure 3: Online terrain property mapping during robot traversal. (A) Robot snapshots at successive time steps. (B) Penetration resistance ground truth measured by Traveler. (C) Sequential terrain property maps inferred online by the scout robot, Spirit, from proprioceptive sensing; white markers denote the robot trajectory and inset icons indicate movement direction. (D) Corresponding Gaussian process–based uncertainty maps. (E) Coefficient of determination of the linear terrain mechanics model.
Figure 4: Traversal risk estimation and simulation validation for planetary rovers. (A) Distribution of RHex slip ratio within the mapped region, illustrating increasing traversal risk (red areas) with larger sensor payloads (from 40 to 100 kg). (B) Distribution of slip ratio of the wheeled rover for payload range between 0 kg to 60 kg. (C-E) Simulation validation in a digital twin of the Ames LHS-1 testbed using Chrono. (C, D) RHex (80 kg and 40 kg) moves along a straight path with decreasing strength. The 80 kg robot becomes immobilized in medium-strength terrain (yellow), whereas the 40kg robot successfully traverses the region without failure. (E) RHex (80 kg) moving along a safe path based on the terrain strength map. For all scenarios, the position (middle) and velocity (right) are recorded over time.
Figure 5: Workflow for safe rover mission planning integrating satellite imagery, in-situ measurements, and science-interest-driven goal selection. (A) Overview of the mission plan showing a top-down view of the operational area and the tentative traversal region (purple rectangle). (B) LiDAR-based reconstruction of the traversal region with elevation data (1184–1189 m). (C) LiDAR-based inclination measurements, and initial identification of candidate rover routes. (D) Field interface enabling real-time visualization of terrain strength and science goal selection: (a) estimated toe force over time; (b) toe force during the penetration phase; (c) model fitness; (d) penetration resistance measured from each step; and (e) interpolated penetration resistance map generated via Gaussian Process regression. (E) Field snapshot after Spirit robot scouting. (F) Final penetration resistance map of the scouted region.
Figure 6: Comparison of naive versus safe path planning for rover navigation. (A) Snapshots of rover traversal along the naive path at (1) T=15 s, (2) T=30 s, (3) T=45 s, and (4) T=60 s, where the rover speed drops to near zero upon entering a soft region. (B) Snapshots of rover traversal along the safe path at (1) T=20 s, (2) T=30 s, (3) T=48 s, and (4) T=72 s, where the rover maintains acceptable forward speed. (C) Predicted rover traversal risk (based on required torque) with the naive path (dashed black) and the safe path (green) overlaid. The color of the path represent experimentally-measured rover speed. (D) Time series of commanded versus actual rover speed during the two traversals. Labels (1)–(4) in A–D correspond to the same waypoints along the path.
Figure 7: Estimating terrain resistance from legged robot interactions using Gaussian Process regression. (A, B) A legged scout collects penetration force and toe position data during each stance phase. From the force-depth profile, terrain resistance is computed. (C) Force and position traces are used to estimate ground contact and penetration depth. (D) Penetration resistance is extracted from the slope of the force-depth curve. Bottom: Gaussian Process regression (kriging) is applied for continuous interpolation of terrain strength. Ground truth (E) shows discrete terrain classes. (F) 1D kriging reconstructs resistance along a path with uncertainty bounds. (G) 2D kriging produces a continuous regolith strength map across the testbed, with uncertainty characterization (H).
Figure 8: Analytical terradynamics models for predicting rover speed. (A) Experimental setup for traversal risk validation using a fluidized granular testbed and a small-scale RHex platform. (B) Terradynamics-based traversal risk model for RHex-class robots [ 47 , 64 ] . (C) Comparison of model-predicted robot speed and experimental measurements. Black markers represent experimentally-measured robot speed for a 0.4 kg rover. Blue, green, orange, red and purple curves represent the model-predicted robot speed for masses of 0.3 kg, 0.4 kg, 0.5 kg, 0.6 kg and 0.7 kg, respectively. (D) Wheeled rover experiments at White Sands analog site. (E) Terradynamics-based traversal risk model for wheeled rovers [ 2 ] . (F) Model-predicted rover slip ratio and axle torque, as a function of terrain penetration resistance per unit area. (G) Traveler to measure the penetration resistance from the fluidized granular testbed. (H) Schematic illustrating the sand solidification depth as a result of comparison between yield force and applied force. (I) Measured terrain penetration resistance per unit area as a function of fluidized bed blower frequency.
Y/X
0-1m
1-2m
2-3m
3-4m
0-1m
4.17
1.16
0.31
0.74
1-2m
4.93
1.04
0.30
0.28
2-3m
4.46
5.75
1.41
1.65
3-4m
1.23
4.04
3.93
1.71
4-5m
0.35
0.35
5.98
4.87
5-6m
1.03
0.56
8.38
4.16
Table 1: Stiffness parameter matrix for NASA Ames LHS-1 simulant testbed. Each cell represents the average stiffness value (N/cm 3 ) for a 1 × 1 meter region, with coordinates (x, y) corresponding to the physical testbed layout.
Hyperparameter
Symbol
Value
Bounds
Description
Length Scale
l
0.5
Noise Floor
n
0.2
Constant
c
5
Table 2: Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) hyperparameters. Physical descriptions, if applicable, and values of the hyperparameter used a
Autonomous planetary exploration requires robots to navigate unknown, uneven terrain while assessing risk, traversability, and energetic cost. Quadruped scouts are well suited for this task because they can traverse irregular surfaces and gather mobility-relevant information during locomotion. This paper presents a terrain-aware exploration framework that combines exteroceptive and proprioceptive mapping for a quadruped robot in lunar-like environments. An onboard RGB-D camera builds robot-centered elevation maps, estimates geometric traversability, and derives navigation costs for autonomous planning. In parallel, proprioceptive measurements provide interaction-aware terrain cues that complement geometry-based assessment. Local maps are incrementally registered into a global multi-layer representation, which is used by an exploration module to select targets in unexplored regions of interest. The targets are reached by an autonomous navigation system that guides collision-aware motion using the available map and cost layers. Simulation results on NVIDIA Isaac Sim show autonomous exploration, map expansion, and spatial association between terrain geometry and robot-terrain interaction. Subsequent navigation using this information exhibits lower average Cost of Transport (CoT) than initial exploration.
Alberto Sanchez-Delgado, João Carlos Virgolino Soares, Victor Barasuol +1
Dynamic Legged Systems lab (DLS), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Genoa, Italy
The ability to efficiently and effectively explore planetary surfaces is currently limited by the capability of wheeled rovers to traverse challenging terrains, and by pre-programmed data acquisition plans with limited in-situ flexibility. In this paper, we present two novel approaches to address these limitations: (i) high-mobility legged robots that use direct surface interactions to collect rich information about the terrain's mechanics to guide exploration; (ii) human-inspired data acquisition algorithms that enable robots to reason about scientific hypotheses and adapt exploration priorities based on incoming ground-sensing measurements. We successfully verify our approach through lab work and field deployments in two planetary analog environments. The new capability for legged robots to measure soil mechanical properties is shown to enable effective traversal of challenging terrains. When coupled with other geologic properties (e.g., composition, thermal properties, and grain size data etc), soil mechanical measurements reveal key factors governing the formation and development of geologic environments. We then demonstrate how human-inspired algorithms turn terrain-sensing robots into teammates, by supporting more flexible and adaptive data collection decisions with human scientists. Our approach therefore enables exploration of a wider range of planetary environments and new substrate investigation opportunities through integrated human-robot systems that support maximum scientific return.
Cristina G. Wilson, Marion Nachon, Shipeng Liu +20
Collaborative Robotics and Intelligent Systems Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 97331, USA · Department of Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, USA · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90089, USA +7
Deformable granular terrains introduce significant locomotion and immobilization risks in planetary exploration and are difficult to detect via remote sensing (e.g., vision). Legged robots can sense terrain properties through leg-terrain interactions during locomotion, offering a direct means to assess traversability in deformable environments. How to systematically exploit this interaction-derived information for navigation planning, however, remains underexplored. We address this gap by presenting PSANE, a Proprioceptive Safe Active Navigation and Exploration framework that leverages leg-terrain interaction measurements for safe navigation and exploration in unknown deformable environments. PSANE learns a traversability model via Gaussian Process regression to estimate and certify safe regions and identify exploration frontiers online, and integrates these estimates with a reactive controller for real-time navigation. Frontier selection is formulated as a multi-objective optimization that balances safe-set expansion probability and goal-directed cost, with subgoals selected via scalarization over the Pareto-optimal frontier set. PSANE safely explores unknown granular terrain and reaches specified goals using only proprioceptively estimated traversability, while achieving performance improvements over baseline methods.
Matthew Y. Jiang, Feifei Qian, Shipeng Liu
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA · University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA