(hu)Man vs. Machine: In the Future of Motorsport, can Autonomous Vehicles Compete?
Authors: Armand Amaritei, Amber-Lily Blackadder, Sebastian Donnelly, Lora Hernandez, James Vine, Alexander Rast, Matthias Rolf, Andrew Bradley
Organizations: Autonomous Driving and Intelligent Transport Group, Oxford Brookes University, UK · School of Engineering, Computing & Mathematics, Oxford Brookes University, UK · Artificial Intelligence, Data Analysis and Systems Institute, Oxford Brookes University, UK
Motorsport has historically driven technological innovation in the automotive industry. Autonomous racing provides a proving ground to push the limits of performance of autonomous vehicle (AV) systems. In principle, AVs could be at least as fast, if not faster, than humans. However, human driven racing provides broader audience appeal thus far, and is more strategically challenging. Both provide opportunities to push each other even further technologically, yet competitions remain separate. This paper evaluates whether the future of motorsport could encompass joint competition between humans and AVs. Analysis of the current state of the art, as well as recent competition outcomes, shows that while technical performance has reached comparable levels, there are substantial challenges in racecraft, strategy and safety that need to be overcome. Outstanding issues involved in mixed human-AI racing, ranging from an initial assessment of critical factors such as system-level latencies, to effective planning and risk guarantees are explored. The crucial non-technical aspect of audience engagement and appeal regarding the changing character of motorsport is addressed. In the wider context of motorsport and AVs, this work outlines a proposed agenda for future research to 'keep pushing the possible', in the true spirit of motorsport.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison of human and automated driven performance over the past decade based on data for the Skidpad event at Formula Student Germany
Figure 2: Comparison of timed laps along the mid-line and possible racing lines of a track with the ADS-DV (FSUK-AI).
Autonomous racing serves as a compelling testbed for advancing autonomous vehicle systems. The 1/10-scale F1Tenth platform is widely adopted for education and research, with annual competitions held worldwide. Yet, leading solutions in these tournaments remain dominated by rule-based approaches. While learning-based methods have been proposed, they focus primarily on single-vehicle settings, leaving challenging multi-vehicle interactions largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce End2Race, an end-to-end learning framework designed for head-to-head autonomous racing. Using this framework, we develop a computationally efficient policy network that achieves an inference latency below 1 ms on an F1Tenth onboard computer. Extensive evaluations show that the policy generalizes to both novel tracks and unseen opponent behaviors, demonstrating high racing speeds, robust safety, and adaptive overtaking maneuvers. These results substantially outperform both prior learning-based methods and rule-based baselines. Codebase is available at https://github.com/michigan-traffic-lab/End2Race.
Zhijie Qiao, Haowei Li, Zhong Cao +1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA · University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
In this paper, we describe the Mission Performance module implemented for a fully autonomous racing car to automatically manage the longitudinal, lateral, and combined performances, aiming to speedup the laptime progression while assuring safety. Motivated by the difficulty and risks of applying the real-time estimation of the grip to critical modules like the motion planner and controller, the Mission Performance guides these modules adapting their target performance instead of changing the vehicle model parameters. The module is formed by pre-defined progressions to warm up the tires at the beginning of a run. Then, the system continuously monitors safety and vehicle dynamics metrics on a per-sector basis to adaptively reduce, maintain, or increase the performance levels for each sector, progressively converging toward the maximum allowed value. The solution's effectiveness is demonstrated on the EAV-25, a fully autonomous Dallara Superformula, at the Yas Marina Circuit during the Abu Dhabi Autonomous Racing League (A2RL) Season 2.
Giovanni Lambertini, Matteo Pini, Nicola Musiu +3
Department of Physics, Informatics and Mathematics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are now operating on public roads, which makes their testing and validation more critical than ever. Simulation offers a safe and controlled environment for evaluating AV performance in varied conditions. However, existing simulation tools mainly focus on graphical realism and rely on simple rule-based models and therefore fail to accurately represent the complexity of driving behaviors and interactions. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown strong potential to address these limitations; however, despite the rapid progress across AI methodologies, a comprehensive survey of their application to mixed autonomy traffic simulation remains lacking. Existing surveys either focus on simulation tools without examining the AI methods behind them, or cover ego-centric decision-making without addressing the broader challenge of modeling surrounding traffic. Moreover, they do not offer a unified taxonomy of AI methods covering individual behavior modeling to full scene simulation. To address these gaps, this survey provides a structured review and synthesis of AI methods for modeling AV and human driving behavior in mixed autonomy traffic simulation. We introduce a taxonomy that organizes methods into three families: agent-level behavior models, environment-level simulation methods, and cognitive and physics-informed methods. The survey analyzes how existing simulation platforms fall short of the needs of mixed autonomy research and outlines directions to narrow this gap. It also provides a chronological overview of AI methods and reviews evaluation protocols and metrics, simulation tools, and datasets. By covering both traffic engineering and computer science perspectives, we aim to bridge the gap between these two communities.
Department of Transport & Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. · Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Michigan, Dearborn, Michigan, USA · 3Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, United States.