DMD-augmented Unpaired Neural Schrödinger Bridge for Ultra-Low Field MRI Enhancement

Low-field to high-field MRI synthesis has emerged as a promising strategy to improve image quality when access to high-field scanners is limited. However, in ultra-low-field settings, the degradation of anatomical detail is spatially heterogeneous: structurally ambiguous regions are more susceptible to unstable high-frequency generation, which may produce anatomically inconsistent textures and boundaries. This issue is particularly problematic when synthesized images are used for downstream quantitative analysis. We therefore study how to make diffusion-based LF-to-HF synthesis more spatially reliable, rather than only sharper on average. To this end, we propose a reliability-guided diffusion framework (ReDiff) with two complementary inference-time mechanisms. First, a reliability-guided sampling strategy attenuates unstable reverse-diffusion updates in regions with weak low-field support. Second, an uncertainty-aware candidate selection scheme aggregates multiple stochastic reconstructions according to spatial consensus and predictive uncertainty. Beyond aggregate image quality, we test whether the uncertainty is itself a usable reliability signal. Experiments on paired 64mT$\rightarrow$3T MRI datasets show that ReDiff attains the lowest LPIPS across three contrasts and two datasets while remaining competitive on PSNR and SSIM, and downstream segmentation analysis indicates better preservation of anatomical structure.

Ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI offers portable and accessible neuroimaging but suffers from reduced signal-to-noise ratio and limited spatial resolution compared to high-field (HF) systems. Acquiring paired ULF-HF data for supervised enhancement is often difficult, particularly in resource-limited settings. We introduce ULF-Synth, a framework that combines: (i) acquisition-based synthesis of realistic ULF images from HF volumes to create large-scale paired training data, (ii) a spatial-frequency domain objective that prioritizes recovery of high-frequency anatomical detail. This formulation is architecture-agnostic, consistently improving structural similarity and perceptual fidelity across encoder-decoder, adversarial, and diffusion-based translation models. When trained exclusively on synthetic data, the resulting models generalize effectively to real 64mT ULF acquisitions, improving downstream multiclass brain segmentation and achieving higher radiologist preference and diagnostic acceptability in a blinded reader study. These findings demonstrate that synthetic paired supervision provides a practical and scalable pathway for enhancing ULF MRI without requiring real paired acquisitions. Code, Models and Dataset: https://github.com/toufiqmusah/ULF-Synth

Super-resolution and quality enhancement of 1.5,T brain MRI are normally validated with image-fidelity metrics, although their purpose is to improve downstream analysis. We study whether enhancement improves tissue segmentation, and for which segmenters. We propose an unpaired, physics-guided training pipeline for a lightweight ($\le$2.5,M parameter) recurrent convolutional enhancer: a six-module stochastic 1.5,T degradation operator, a residual adversarial network that adds scanner-specific texture without moving anatomy, and a cycle-consistent objective with an anti-identity penalty that rules out the copy solution. We then train U-Net, Swin-UNet and wavelet token-mixing segmenters \citep{jeevan2023wavemix} from scratch on either raw or enhanced 1.5,T images of the same subjects, using identical labels and subject-level splits, for three enhancer variants and two datasets. On ABIDE (41 held-out subjects, FreeSurfer labels) enhancement significantly improves the wavelet segmenter (mean Dice $+0.014$, Wilcoxon $p=3.5\times10^{-5}$; CSF $+0.018$, grey matter $+0.013$), significantly degrades the U-Net ($-0.008$, $p=5.1\times10^{-4}$) and leaves Swin-UNet unchanged. On IXI, whose labels come from FSL-FAST, enhancement lowers Dice for all nine pairings, almost entirely through CSF; we trace this to spatially implausible CSF voxels in the labels that penalise smoother predictions. Enhancement of low-field MRI should therefore be validated per downstream model and against reliable labels.