IROSA: Interactive Robot Skill Adaptation using Natural Language
Authors: Markus Knauer, Samuel Bustamante, Thomas Eiband, Alin Albu-Schäffer, Freek Stulp, João Silvério
Organizations: All authors are with the German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics (RMC), Münchener Str. 20, 82234 Weßling, Germany. · Markus Knauer, Alin Albu-Schäffer and Samuel Bustamante are also with the School of Computation, Information and Technology (CIT), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Foundation models have demonstrated impressive capabilities across diverse domains, while imitation learning provides principled methods for robot skill adaptation from limited data. Combining these approaches holds significant promise for direct application to robotics, yet this combination has received limited attention, particularly for industrial deployment. We present a novel framework that enables open-vocabulary skill adaptation through a tool-based architecture, maintaining a protective abstraction layer between the language model and robot hardware. Our approach leverages pre-trained LLMs to select and parameterize specific tools for adapting robot skills without requiring fine-tuning or direct model-to-robot interaction. We demonstrate the framework on a 7-DoF torque-controlled robot performing an industrial bearing ring insertion task, showing successful skill adaptation through natural language commands for speed adjustment, trajectory correction, and obstacle avoidance while maintaining safety, transparency, and interpretability.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : Overview of our approach I nteractive RO bot S kill A daptation using natural language. Showing the interactive selection and parameterization of a tool by a LLM based on a user query leading to a skill adaptation via the used execution model. Some of the tools we are providing are shown. ”Respond to User” is a general tool, whereas ”Repulsion Point”, ”Via-Point Insertion” and ”Speed Modulation” are specific tools to adapt KMPs.
Method
Approach
Training- Free
Open Vocab.
Zero- Shot
Explain- able
Local LLM
OLAF [ 18 ]
Policy retraining
×
∼
×
×
✓
LaTTe [ 12 ]
End-to-end
×
×
✓
×
✓
Merlo [ 20 ]
Action Replan.
✓
✓
×
✓
∼
Yu [ 21 ]
Reward Synth.
×
✓
×
∼
×
OVITA [ 22 ]
Code Gen.
✓
✓
×
✓
×
Ours
Tool-based
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
TABLE I : Comparison of Language-Conditioned Trajectory Adaptation Approaches. Training-Free: no task-specific (re)training required. Open Vocabulary: handles arbitrary natural language instructions. Zero-shot: no iterative user feedback required to validate model output. Explainable: adaptation steps are traceable and interpretable. Local LLM: operates with locally-deployed language models.
Fig. 2 : Demonstration and prediction analysis for the pick-and-insert task. (Top) Trajectory in robot frame. (Bottom) Demonstrations and KMP model predictions with uncertainty visualization.
Fig. 3 : Speed adaptation results showing temporal trajectory modification through natural language commands. The plot shows the adapted trajectories following command “slow down between box and station,” demonstrating precise temporal control while preserving spatial trajectory characteristics.
Fig. 4 : Trajectory adaptation through natural language command showing (top) experimental setup with new object (camera) placement and (bottom) resulting KMP trajectory modification with via-point insertion to reach the new object while maintaining task completion.
Fig. 5 : Obstacle avoidance through natural language command showing (top) experimental workspace with introduced obstacle and (bottom) KMP trajectory modification using repulsion points. The system generates collision-free paths while maintaining the overall task structure and successfully completing the pick-and-insert operation.
Method
Time (s)
OVITA - LLM: Gemini (cloud)
72.1
OVITA - LLM: Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct (local)
27.1
IROSA - LLM: Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct (local)
15.4
TABLE II : Comparison with OVITA baseline
Experiment
OVITA (cloud)
OVITA (local)
IROSA (local)
CSR
ISR
TCR
CSR
ISR
TCR
CSR
ISR
TCR
Speed Adapt.
100.0
100.0
100.0
70.0
10.0
30.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Traj. Correct.
90.0
40.0
30.0
40.0
10.0
0.0
100.0
80.0
100.0
Obst. Avoid.
80.0
40.0
30.0
60.0
60.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
TABLE III : Quantitative comparison across experiments (10 prompts × 5 runs each). Prompts collected from public demonstration visitors and colleagues. Full prompt set available in our repository.
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics (RMC), Münchener Str. 20, 82234 Weßling, Germany · School of Computation, Information and Technology (CIT), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, South Korea · Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, POSTECH, Pohang, South Korea