4D radars, which provide 3D point cloud data along with Doppler velocity, are attractive components of modern automated driving systems due to their low cost and robustness under adverse weather conditions. However, they provide a significantly lower point cloud density than LiDAR sensors. This makes it important to exploit not only local but also global contextual scene information. This paper proposes DRIFT, a model that effectively captures and fuses both local and global contexts through a dual-path architecture. The model incorporates a point path to aggregate fine-grained local features and a pillar path to encode coarse-grained global features. These two parallel paths are intertwined via novel feature-sharing layers at multiple stages, enabling full utilization of both representations. DRIFT is evaluated on the widely used View-of-Delft (VoD) dataset and a proprietary internal dataset. It outperforms the baselines on the tasks of object detection and/or free road estimation. For example, DRIFT achieves a mean average precision (mAP) of 52.6% (compared to, say, 45.4% of CenterPoint) on the VoD dataset.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : Example scene from the View-of-Delft [ 1 ] dataset with radar and annotation data. The two inlets on the left show corresponding LiDAR and radar point clouds around the same pedestrian. Unlike the LiDAR point cloud, it is difficult to detect the pedestrian using only the local region of the radar point cloud due to its sparsity. However, incorporating global information (i.e. the pedestrian’s relative position to the ego-vehicle and the scene, e.g. drivable area marked with blue) with local features such as shape and velocity, the pedestrian’s presence becomes more apparent.
Fig. 2 : Comparison of dual-representation model structures. FS denotes feature sharing block. (a) The sequential path processes the point cloud through a point-based path first, then through a voxel-based path, e.g. [ 4 ] . (b) The parallel path with fusion at the end processes both paths independently and merges their outputs before proceeding with a single-representation path, e.g. [ 5 , 6 ] . (c) Proposed structure processes both paths in parallel and introduces feature sharing at each intermediate stage between them.
Fig. 3 : Model architecture. The top figure shows the overall architecture of DRIFT, which consists of a point path, a pillar path, and feature sharing blocks. The feature after block i : Mi×CiinHi×Wi refers to a sparse pillar representation tensor with shape Mi×Ci , from BEV grid size Hi×Wi , where Mi is the number of non-empty pillars and Ci is the number of channels. (a) Point transformer block. (b) Pillar transformer block. (c1) Feature sharing block with add or concatenation fusion. (c2) Feature sharing block with cross-attention fusion.
Method
Entire Area
Driving Corridor
mAP ↑
Car ↑
Ped. ↑
Cyc. ↑
mAP ↑
Car ↑
Ped. ↑
Cyc. ↑
PointPillars † [ 9 ]
45.2
37.1
35.0
63.4
67.5
70.2
47.2
85.1
CenterPoint † [ 2 ]
45.4
32.7
38.0
65.5
65.1
62.0
48.2
85.5
CenterPoint * [ 2 ]
47.4
39.9
37.8
64.7
67.4
71.3
47.3
83.7
PillarNeXt [ 29 ]
42.2
30.8
33.1
62.8
63.6
66.7
39.0
85.1
RadarPillars [ 12 ]
50.7
41.1
38.6
72.6
70.5
71.1
52.3
87.9
TABLE I : Comparison of VoD validation set results. DRIFT uses cross-attention feature sharing. Pre-training is performed by perciv-scenes-2 dataset. The best results of each configuration (with and without pre-training) are bold. Results marked with † are inherited from [ 6 ] , results marked with * comes from re-implemented methods.
Method
Object Detection
Free-road
mAP ↑
NDS ↑
APcar↑
APped.↑
APcyc.↑
IoUfree↑
IoUocc↑
CenterPoint [ 2 ]
51.8
50.9
55.5
45.2
54.6
71.5
28.6
DRIFT (attention)
55.2
52.7
56.0
51.8
57.8
73.3
29.7
TABLE II : Comparison of object detection and free-road segmentation results on perciv-scenes-2 validation set.
Fig. 4 : Visualization results of ground truth, CenterPoint, and DRIFT (proposed) on the VoD validation set. Blue/green/red boxes indicate car, pedestrian, and cyclist detections, respectively. All images are trimmed.
Fig. 5 : Visualization of free-road ground truth and prediction on perciv-scenes-2 validation set on BEV. Yellow segment indicate free-road region.
Configuration
mAPall↑
mAProi↑
Pillar Path (no trans.)
46.8 ± 0.6
67.5 ± 0.1
Pillar Path (no trans., double channel)
47.5 ± 0.6
68.1 ± 2.2
Pillar Path (trans. in 1st block)
48.6 ± 1.3
69.3 ± 1.0
Pillar Path (trans. in all blocks)
49.6 ± 0.7
69.3 ± 0.8
Pillar Path (trans. in all blocks, double channel)
50.0 ± 0.5
69.1 ± 0.8
Dual Path (trans. in 1st blocks)
49.2 ± 0.8
68.9 ± 0.5
TABLE III : Ablation study on the two data representation paths and transformer blocks.
Fusion Configuration
mAPall↑
mAProi↑
Point to Pillar
Pillar to Point
Add
Add
49.9 ± 0.7
69.7 ± 0.5
Concat
Concat
49.4 ± 0.9
69.8 ± 0.8
Attention
Attention
51.5 ± 1.1
70.6 ± 0.8
Add
Attention
50.7 ± 0.2
69.6 ± 1.1
Attention
Add
50.2 ± 1.2
69.6 ± 0.6
TABLE IV : Comparison of different types of feature sharing methods.
Fusion Configuration
mAPall↑
mAProi↑
None (pillar path only)
49.0 ± 0.4
69.4 ± 0.6
Point to Pillar Only
49.4 ± 0.2
68.8 ± 0.7
First Block Only
49.4 ± 0.4
69.9 ± 0.4
Last Block Only
49.9 ± 0.2
69.1 ± 0.2
All Blocks
51.5 ± 1.1
70.6 ± 0.8
TABLE V : Ablation study on feature sharing blocks.
4D radar has emerged as a promising next-generation sensor for improving the robustness of autonomous driving perception systems because of its stable sensing capability under adverse weather conditions. However, deploying 4D radar in embedded environments with limited hardware resources requires radar-representation preprocessing that jointly considers perception accuracy, real-time performance, and computational complexity. This paper proposes a preprocessing framework for 4D-radar-based 3D object detection. First, Percentile-based 3D Shape Preservation (P3DP) extracts point clouds from radar tensors while preserving object-shape information and suppressing noise and false alarms. Second, Multi-frame-based Noise Point Discrimination using Kernel Density Estimation (MF-KDE) improves the density and reliability of sparse radar point clouds. Finally, Embedded & NetScore (ENS) evaluates suitability for embedded deployment by jointly considering accuracy, real-time performance, adverse-weather robustness, and model complexity.
Woo-Jin Jung, Dong-Hee Paek, Jeong-Su Park +1
Cho Chun Shik Graduate School of Mobility Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 34051, Republic of Korea · Mechanical Engineering Research Institute Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea · Autonomous Driving Perception Technology Vanguard Team Hyundai Motor Company Seongnam-si 13529, Republic of Korea
4D automotive radar is indispensable for autonomous driving due to its low cost and robustness, yet its point cloud sparsity challenges 3D object detection. Existing 4D radar-camera fusion methods focus on complex fusion strategies, trading inference speed for marginal gains. This trade-off hinders real-time deployment due to heavy computation on dense feature maps. In contrast, feature extraction from sparse radar points is less time-consuming but remains under-explored. This work uncovers that simply enhancing radar feature extraction can achieve comparable or even higher performance than elaborate fusion modules, while maintaining real-time performance. Based on this finding, we propose RCGDet3D, which centers on radar feature encoding and simplifies multi-modal fusion. Its encoder inherits from the efficient Gaussian Splatting-based Point Gaussian Encoder (PGE) in RadarGaussianDet3D with two key improvements. First, the Ray-centric PGE (R-PGE) predicts Gaussian attributes in ray-aligned coordinate systems before unifying them to Bird's-Eye View (BEV) space, significantly improving geometric consistency and reducing learning difficulty by decoupling the coordinate transformation from representation learning. Second, a Semantic Injection (SI) module incorporates visual cues from images, producing more geometrically accurate and semantically enriched radar features. Experiments on View-of-Delft (VoD) and TJ4DRadSet show that RCGDet3D outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both accuracy and speed, setting a new benchmark for real-time deployment.
Weiyi Xiong, Bing Zhu
School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, P.R. China
4D radar-camera sensing configuration has gained increasing importance in autonomous driving. However, existing 3D object detection methods that fuse 4D Radar and camera data confront several challenges. First, their absolute depth estimation module is not robust and accurate enough, leading to inaccurate 3D localization. Second, the performance of their temporal fusion module will degrade dramatically or even fail when the ego vehicle's pose is missing or inaccurate. Third, for some small objects, the sparse radar point clouds may completely fail to reflect from their surfaces. In such cases, detection must rely solely on visual unimodal priors. To address these limitations, we propose R4Det, which enhances depth estimation quality via the Panoramic Depth Fusion module, enabling mutual reinforcement between absolute and relative depth. For temporal fusion, we design a Deformable Gated Temporal Fusion module that does not rely on the ego vehicle's pose. In addition, we built an Instance-Guided Dynamic Refinement module that extracts semantic prototypes from 2D instance guidance. Experiments show that R4Det achieves state-of-the-art 3D object detection results on the TJ4DRadSet and VoD datasets. The source code and models will be released at https://github.com/VDIGPKU/R4Det.
Zhongyu Xia, Yousen Tang, Yongtao Wang +2
Wangxuan Institute of Computer Technology, Peking University · EBTech Co. Ltd