In this paper, we present a novel black-box online controller that uses only end-to-end measurements over short segments, without internal instrumentation, and hill climbing to maximize goodput, defined as the throughput of requests that satisfy the service-level objective. We provide empirical evidence that this design is well-founded. Using this advance in LLM serving as a concrete example, we then discuss the importance of integrating system performance and sustainability metrics into Factsheets for organizations adopting AI systems.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: SLO-Tuner treats the server as a black box and tunes concurrency, batch size, and speculative width from tail latency and goodput.
Fig. 2: Simulator goodput–p99 tradeoffs (steady vs. bursty).
LLMs are becoming an indispensable part of network control systems due to their impressive reasoning. Before such LLM-enabled systems can be deployed, it is imperative to develop tools that can audit their performance on previously unseen inputs. However, auditing these systems is challenging due to the inherent opacity of LLMs. LENS is the first step towards black-box performance analysis of LLM-enabled network control systems. It uses novel methods to extend deep reinforcement learning to guide the search for performance gaps and inputs that make LLMs struggle. LENS finds large gaps for LLM-based traffic engineering and GPU allocation systems, and even matches existing white-box analyzers designed for hand-crafted TE heuristics.
Mahdi Alizadeh, Pooria Namyar, Arvin Ghavidel +1
University of Southern California · Microsoft Research
Every major LLM serving system is designed to meet TTFT and TPOT SLOs. These metrics capture latency as a human user perceives it, and the mechanisms built to satisfy them are now standard infrastructure. We observe that long-horizon AI tasks call LLMs programmatically in tight loops where no human observes TTFT or TPOT. We ask: how much throughput do serving systems sacrifice to meet TTFT and TPOT SLAs that these workloads never need? We conduct a systematic measurement study across chunk sizes, SLO settings, context lengths, and concurrency levels. We find that the human tax on throughput grows substantially with context length and lands in the 60-93% range. At 64K token contexts, tightening the TTFT SLO to production-typical settings costs a large fraction of throughput versus the human-less baseline. The human tax is larger at higher concurrency and is qualitatively similar across SGLang and Sarathi-Serve. We term the unconstrained optimum human-less serving and provide a prototype demonstrating that it is practical on real workloads. Our findings argue that serving systems should expose workload-class-aware SLA configurations rather than silently applying the human tax uniformly to all traffic.
Jianhui Lian, Li Chen, Dan Li +1
Tsinghua SIGS · Beijing Zhongguancun Laboratory · Tsinghua University
As LLMs are increasingly deployed within agentic systems, their capabilities depend not only on the model weights but also on the harness: the prompts, tools, control flow, memory, and orchestration code surrounding them. This makes automated harness optimization -- the iterative and evaluation-guided improvement of a harness by an AI system -- both an important route to improving AI systems and a demanding capability for AI systems themselves. Yet the community lacks a common protocol for measuring how well frontier LLMs perform at this task. We introduce HarnessOpt-Bench, a benchmark for end-to-end harness optimization under expensive and stochastic evaluation. An optimizer, an LLM paired with a coding harness, receives a target agent's seed harness, graded evaluation feedback, and a fixed target-evaluation budget. It edits the harness and nominates a final candidate, which is scored by its normalized gain over the seed on a held-out test partition that remains inaccessible throughout search. A trusted execution environment enforces the evaluation boundary, meters target-agent resource use, and preserves candidate versions for audit. We evaluate 5 frontier LLMs as optimizers both under a shared coding harness and under their native harnesses across 4 downstream tasks, over 111 scored runs. Experiment results show that optimizer models separate more than the coding harnesses they act through, native harnesses are not consistently superior, and gains vary substantially across tasks and seed regimes. These results establish harness optimization as a measurable and discriminative capability with large space for improvement.