Not an Obstacle for Dog, but a Hazard for Human: A Co-Ego Navigation System for Guide Dog Robots

Robotic guide dogs should understand their surroundings, objects, and potential risks. Prior research has focused on raw sensor data from cameras and 2D or 3D LiDAR, which precisely measure distance points rather than provide a semantic understanding of the scene. While these physical measurements are effective for robot-centric collision avoidance and robot safety, they are not suitable for human-centric guidance. The system should recognize the type and relevance of obstacles and explain them, clearly and actionably, in terms of their spatial relation to the user. We present complete on-device perception modules that fuse a 360 camera and a 2D LiDAR for reliable collision avoidance, with moving-object detection and tracking for human-centric guidance. Finally, in walking-impossible situations, a vision--language model delivers pathway explanations as a safety mechanism to reduce user anxiety. In experiments, verification of fused 360 camera--LiDAR depth shows reliable near-range perception but inherent mid-range bias, while the system as a whole sustained real-time performance under 55 W. On the real-world egocentric GuideDogQA benchmark, our system achieved 83.8% accuracy, compared with 67.1% for GPT-4o. These results demonstrate that practical human-centric guidance with real-time on-device inference is feasible even on quadrupeds.

Many Blind and Low-Vision (BLV) people rely on guide dogs for moment-to-moment navigation, such as staying on path and avoiding obstacles and pedestrians. However, guide dogs are expensive to acquire and maintain (approximately $50k USD plus ongoing costs), often involve long waiting lists, and have relatively short life expectancies. While robot guide dogs offer a promising alternative, existing approaches exploring this idea suffer from several drawbacks: They often lack the autonomy required for real-world deployment, relying on prior 3D scans of the environment, external computation, or limited awareness of the handler. In this work, we present Milo, the first open-source, low-cost (approximately $2k USD) robotic guide dog platform capable of fulfilling the basic collaborative navigation role expected of a guide dog. Milo is fully autonomous, requiring no a priori knowledge of the environment, completely self-contained with all computation performed onboard, and suitable for both indoor and outdoor navigation while avoiding obstacles and pedestrians. Our system consists of a modified Unitree Go2 robot (equipped with onboard compute, sensors, and a handle), a perception stack combining voxel mapping with floor, obstacle, and pedestrian detection, and a navigation stack based on an obstacle-avoidance policy trained in a custom bird's-eye-view simulator. We evaluate Milo in real indoor and outdoor obstacle courses and compare it against a costmap-based baseline, demonstrating smoother navigation and fewer handler collisions. To maximize accessibility for BLV users, we release both the robot hardware instructions and the complete software stack as open source.

Robotic guidance systems have shown promise in supporting blind and visually impaired (BVI) individuals with wayfinding and obstacle avoidance. However, most existing systems assume a clear path and do not support a critical aspect of navigation - environmental interactions that require manipulating objects to enable movement. These interactions are challenging for a human-robot pair because they demand (i) precise localization and manipulation of interaction targets (e.g., pressing elevator buttons) and (ii) dynamic coordination between the user's and robot's movements (e.g., pulling out a chair to sit). We present a collaborative human-robot approach that combines our robotic guide dog's precise sensing and localization capabilities with the user's ability to perform physical manipulation. The system alternates between two modes: lead mode, where the robot detects and guides the user to the target, and adaptation mode, where the robot adjusts its motion as the user interacts with the environment (e.g., opening a door). Evaluation results show that our system enables navigation that is safer, smoother, and more efficient than both a traditional white cane and a non-adaptive guiding system, with the performance gap widening as tasks demand higher precision in locating interaction targets. These findings highlight the promise of human-robot collaboration in advancing assistive technologies toward more generalizable and realistic navigation support.