cs.CYMar 20, 2026

Profiling learners' affective engagement: Emotion AI, intercultural pragmatics, and language learning

Authors: Robert Godwin-Jones

Organizations: Virginia Commonwealth University

Abstract

Learning another language can be a highly emotional process, typically characterized by numerous frustrations and triumphs, big and small. For most learners, language learning does not follow a linear, predictable path, its zigzag course shaped by motivational (or demotivating) variables such as personal characteristics, teacher/peer relationships, learning materials, and dreams of a future L2 (second language) self. While some aspects of language learning (reading, grammar) are relatively mechanical, others can be stressful and unpredictable, especially conversing in the target language. That experience necessitates not only knowledge of structure and lexis, but also the ability to use the language in ways that are appropriate to the social and cultural context. A new opportunity to practice conversational abilities has arrived through the availability of AI chatbots, with both advantages (responsive, non-judgmental) and drawbacks (emotionally void, culturally biased). This column explores aspects of emotion as they arise in technology use and in particular how automatic emotion recognition and simulated human responsiveness in AI systems interface with language learning and the development of pragmatic and interactional competence. Emotion AI, the algorithmically driven interpretation of users' affective signals, has been seen as enabling greater personalized learning, adapting to perceived learner cognitive and emotional states. Others warn of emotional manipulation and inappropriate and ineffective user profiling

Explore similar work

Jun 8, 2026

AI tools in Arab University English classrooms: Looking back and forward

This paper aims to synthesize empirical research on AI tools used to support English as a second/foreign language (EL2) learners in Arab University classrooms (AUCs) between Jan 1st 2023 and Aug 31st 2025. We utilized 3 large datasets, namely Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus as the data sources. Using PRISMA-guided searches across these well-known databases, we included only published articles. The search process results in 184 studies, but only 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings unveil that EL2 learners have positive attitudes towards AI for drafting, revision, and practice. Empirical gains were most consistent for surface-level outcomes improvements in higher-order writing quality and speaking proficiency was mixed and often contingent on teacher mediation. The paper concludes by proposing a research agenda and practical guidelines for Arab universities seeking evidence-based AI integration in EL2 instruction. It also recommends scaffolded integration, teacher training, reflective tasks to reduce over-reliance on AI tools.
Apr 28, 2026

Ceci n'est pas une explication: Evaluating Explanation Failures as Explainability Pitfalls in Language Learning Systems

AI-powered language learning tools increasingly provide instant, personalised feedback to millions of learners worldwide. However, this feedback can fail in ways that are difficult for learners--and even teachers--to detect, potentially reinforcing misconceptions and eroding learning outcomes over extended use. We present a portion of L2-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating AI systems in language education that includes (but is not limited to) six critical dimensions of effective feedback: diagnostic accuracy, awareness of appropriacy, causes of error, prioritisation, guidance for improvement, and supporting self-regulation. We analyse how AI systems can fail with respect to these dimensions. These failures, which we argue are conducive to "explainability pitfalls," are AI-generated explanations that appear helpful on the surface but are fundamentally flawed, increasing the risk of attainment, human-AI interaction, and socioaffective harms. We discuss how the specific context of language learning amplifies these risks and outline open questions we believe merit more attention when designing evaluation frameworks specifically. Our analysis aims to expand the community's understanding of both the typology of explainability pitfalls and the contextual dynamics in which they may occur in order to encourage AI developers to better design safe, trustworthy, and effective AI explanations.
Mar 19, 2026

Dual-Model Prediction of Affective Engagement and Vocal Attractiveness from Speaker Expressiveness in Video Learning

This paper outlines a machine learning-enabled speaker-centric Emotion AI approach capable of predicting audience-affective engagement and vocal attractiveness in asynchronous video-based learning, relying solely on speaker-side affective expressions. Inspired by the demand for scalable, privacy-preserving affective computing applications, this speaker-centric Emotion AI approach incorporates two distinct regression models that leverage a massive corpus developed within Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) to enable affectively engaging experiences. The regression model predicting affective engagement is developed by assimilating emotional expressions emanating from facial dynamics, oculomotor features, prosody, and cognitive semantics, while incorporating a second regression model to predict vocal attractiveness based exclusively on speaker-side acoustic features. Notably, on speaker-independent test sets, both regression models yielded impressive predictive performance (R2 = 0.85 for affective engagement and R2 = 0.88 for vocal attractiveness), confirming that speaker-side affect can functionally represent aggregated audience feedback. This paper provides a speaker-centric Emotion AI approach substantiated by an empirical study discovering that speaker-side multimodal features, including acoustics, can prospectively forecast audience feedback without necessarily employing audience-side input information.