Cloud-Edge Collaborative Large Models for Robust Photovoltaic Power Forecasting
Organizations: School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China · Department of Computer Science and Technology, BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China · Beijing Smartchip Microelectronics Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 102200, China
Abstract
Photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting in edge-enabled grids requires balancing forecasting accuracy, robustness under weather-driven distribution shifts, and strict latency constraints. Existing models work well under normal conditions but often struggle with rare ramp events and unexpected weather changes. Relying solely on cloud-based large models often leads to significant communication delays, which can hinder timely and efficient forecasting in practical grid environments. To address these issues, we propose a condition-adaptive cloud-edge collaborative framework CAPE for PV forecasting. CAPE consists of three main modules: a site-specific expert model for routine predictions, a lightweight edge-side model for enhanced local inference, and a cloud-based large retrieval model that provides relevant historical cases when needed. These modules are coordinated by a screening module that evaluates uncertainty, out-of-distribution risk, weather mutations, and model disagreement. Furthermore, we employ a Lyapunov-guided routing strategy to dynamically determine when to escalate inference to more powerful models under long-term system constraints. The final forecast is produced through adaptive fusion of the selected model outputs. Experiments on two real-world PV datasets demonstrate that CAPE achieves superior performance in terms of forecasting accuracy, robustness, routing quality, and system efficiency.
Figures & tables
| Symbol | Description |
|---|---|
| , | Set of PV sites and the total number of sites |
| , | Time slot index and edge node index |
| Raw local state of node at time | |
| Local historical observation window | |
| , | Meteorological variables |
| Unified local model input |
| Dataset | Metric | ExO | EdO | CO | ACA | STR | Moirai | AIRG | STKD-PV | CAPE (Ours) |
| Hunan | nMAE (%FS, ) | 8.54 | 6.21 | 3.15 | 4.10 | 4.02 | 3.32 | 5.54 | 4.56 | 3.08 |
| nRMSE (%FS, ) | 11.23 | 8.45 | 4.52 | 5.91 | 5.86 | 4.81 | 7.23 | 6.05 | 4.46 | |
| AUROC ( ) | – | – | – | 0.762 | 0.755 | – | 0.685 | 0.710 | 0.924 | |
| AUPRC ( ) | – | – | – | 0.654 | 0.648 | – | 0.590 | 0.625 | 0.885 | |
| REE (%FS, ) | 25.41 | 18.52 | 8.56 | 11.24 | 11.05 | 9.04 | 14.52 | 12.15 | 8.45 | |
| DG ( ) | 3.50 | 2.10 | 1.15 | 1.48 | 1.45 | 1.18 | 1.70 | 1.35 | 1.12 |