Edge Radar Material Classification Under Geometry Shifts
Authors: Jannik Hohmann, Dong Wang, Andreas Nüchter
Organizations: Department of Informatics XVII (Robotics), Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany. · Zentrum für Telematik e.V., Würzburg · U2IS, ENSTA, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, France.
Material awareness can improve robotic navigation and interaction, particularly in conditions where cameras and LiDAR degrade. We present a lightweight mmWave radar material classification pipeline designed for ultra-low-power edge devices (TI IWRL6432), using compact range-bin intensity descriptors and a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) for real-time inference. While the classifier reaches a macro-F1 of 94.2% under the nominal training geometry, we observe a pronounced performance drop under realistic geometry shifts, including sensor height changes and small tilt angles. These perturbations induce systematic intensity scaling and angle-dependent radar cross section (RCS) effects, pushing features out of distribution and reducing macro-F1 to around 68.5%. We analyze these failure modes and outline practical directions for improving robustness with normalization, geometry augmentation, and motion-aware features.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : Default experimental setup used for baseline data acquisition. The radar is mounted in a nadir-facing configuration at H=45 cm and θ=90∘ relative to the material surface.
Fig. 2 : Confusion matrix of the MLP classifier under nominal conditions ( H=45 cm, θ=90∘ ). Diagonal entries indicate per-class recall.
Fig. 3 : Confidence (maximum Softmax probability) distribution under nominal geometry.
Fig. 4 : Confusion matrix under height variations (35 cm and 55 cm). Off-diagonal density increases due to distance-dependent power changes.
Fig. 5 : Confidence distribution under geometry shifts (tilt). Increased low-confidence predictions indicate reduced certainty under OOD geometry.
Fig. 6 : Confusion matrix for “similar but unknown” data at nominal geometry ( H=45 cm, θ=90∘ ). Increased confusion indicates session-level sensitivity despite unchanged geometry.
Fig. 7 : Confidence distribution for “similar but unknown” data at nominal geometry. The probability mass shifts toward lower confidence compared to the baseline.