Toward Physically Consistent Driving Video World Models under Challenging Trajectories

Video world models are emerging as data engines, action planners, and generative simulators for autonomous driving, but existing benchmarks primarily assess visual fidelity and coarse physical plausibility, providing limited evidence on whether generated driving futures obey realistic vehicle kinematics and dynamics. This limitation is further compounded by the lack of datasets in which vehicle, road, maneuver, and speed conditions are independently controlled, and ground-truth vehicle states are recorded in synchrony with videos. We introduce VehDyn, a driving world model benchmark for vehicle dynamics. VehDyn is built on a CARLA-CarSim co-simulation platform where photorealistic rendering is coupled with a validated multi-body dynamics model, and it contains 10,080 configurations from a full factorial design over five vehicle types, four tire-road friction coefficients, three maneuvers, four target speeds, 14 scenes, and three illuminations, each paired with synchronized position, velocity, and attitude sequences. Built on this dataset, VehDyn introduces a hierarchical evaluation framework that measures trajectory alignment, kinematic consistency, and dynamic consistency, and benchmarks 12 state-of-the-art video world models. We further assess the video quality using two established protocols and correlate it with the VehDyn score. Trajectory-level metrics are nearly saturated, with ten of twelve models within 20% of ground truth, while no model reaches 92% of ground truth on dynamic consistency, and visual-quality metrics are only weakly correlated with vehicle-dynamics fidelity. DrivingWorld achieves the highest VehDyn score, followed by Cosmos 3 Nano and LTX-Video 2.5, and the VehDyn score agrees closely with human judgment. VehDyn provides a systematic foundation for developing driving world models that are physically consistent and visually realistic.

Large-scale labelled driving video data is essential for training autonomous driving systems. Although simulation offers scalable and fully annotated data, the domain gap between synthetic and real-world driving videos significantly limits its utility for downstream deployment. Existing video generation methods are not well-suited for this task, as they fail to simultaneously preserve scene structure, object dynamics, temporal consistency, and visual realism, all of which are critical for maintaining annotation validity in generated data. In this paper, we present DriveCtrl, a depth-conditioned controllable sim-to-real video generation framework for realistic driving video synthesis. Built upon a pretrained video foundation model, DriveCtrl introduces a structure-aware adapter that enables depth-guided generation while preserving the scene layout and motion patterns of the source simulation, producing temporally coherent driving videos that remain aligned with the original simulated sequences. We further introduce a scalable data generation pipeline that transforms simulator videos into realistic driving footage matching the visual style of a target real-world dataset. The pipeline supports three conditioning signals: structural depth, reference-dataset style, and text prompts, while preserving frame-level annotations for downstream perception tasks. To better assess this task, we propose a driving-domain-specific knowledge-informed evaluation metric called Driving Video Realism Score (DVRS) that assesses the realism of generated videos. Experiments demonstrate that DriveCtrl consistently outperforms the base model and competing alternatives in realism, temporal quality, and perception task performance, substantially narrowing the sim-to-real gap for driving video generation.

The ultimate goal of video generation is to satisfy a fundamental trilemma: achieving high visual quality, maintaining rigorous physical consistency, and enabling precise controllability. While recent models can maintain this balance in simple, isolated scenarios, we observe that this equilibrium is fragile and often breaks down as scene complexity increases (e.g., involving collisions or dense traffic). To address this, we introduce Motion Forcing, a framework designed to stabilize this trilemma even in complex generative tasks. Our key insight is to explicitly decouple physical reasoning from visual synthesis via a hierarchical ``Point-Shape-Appearance'' paradigm. This approach decomposes generation into verifiable stages: modeling complex dynamics as sparse geometric anchors (Point), expanding them into dynamic depth maps that explicitly resolve 3D geometry (Shape), and finally rendering high-fidelity textures (Appearance). Furthermore, to foster robust physical understanding, we employ a Masked Point Recovery strategy. By randomly masking input anchors during training and enforcing the reconstruction of complete dynamic depth, the model is compelled to move beyond passive pattern matching and learn latent physical laws (e.g., inertia) to infer missing trajectories. Extensive experiments on autonomous driving benchmarks show that Motion Forcing significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, maintaining trilemma stability across complex scenes. Evaluations on physics and robotics further confirm our framework's generality.