Low-field (LF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves accessibility and reduces costs but generally has lower signal-to-noise ratios and degraded contrast compared to high field (HF) MRI, limiting its clinical utility. Simulating LF MRI from HF MRI enables virtual evaluation of novel imaging devices and development of LF algorithms. Existing low field simulators rely on noise injection and smoothing, which fail to capture the contrast degradation seen in LF acquisitions. To this end, we introduce an end-to-end LF-MRI synthesis framework that learns HF to LF image degradation directly from a small number of paired HF-LF MRIs. Specifically, we introduce a novel HF to LF coordinate-image decoupled neural operator (H2LO) to model the underlying degradation process, and tailor it to capture high-frequency noise textures and image structure. Experimental results in T1w and T2w MRI demonstrate that H2LO produces more faithful simulated low-field images than existing parameterized noise synthesis models and popular image-to-image translation models. Furthermore, it improves performance in downstream image enhancement tasks, showcasing its potential to enhance LF MRI diagnostic capabilities.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the High-to-Low field Operator (H2LO) framework. The architecture maps HF MRI volumes to a continuous LF representation using a branch-trunk network optimized via pointwise intensity fidelity and gradient regularization.
Figure 2: Visualization of generated LF MRIs and ablation studies. (a) Generated T1w (upper rows) and T2w (lower rows) LF images using multiple methods. Even rows visualize the absolute differences between simulated and real LF images. (b) Ablation of multiple components in our model. (c) Testing results of the 5-fold ablation study. (d) Comparison of histograms for LF images generated by Arnold et al. [ 1 ] and our method.
T1
Method
PSNR(dB) ↑
SSIM(%) ↑
NCC ↑
WASS ↓
HNCC ↑
BHAT ↓
JS ↓
Param.
HF Image
23.52 ± 0.44
89.96 ± 0.34
0.9222 ± 0.0035
0.1211 ± 0.0107
0.5130 ± 0.0436
0.2148 ± 0.0218
0.1495 ± 0.0130
–
Arnold et. al. [ 1 ]
14.97 ± 1.16
87.80 ± 1.56
0.9466 ± 0.0069
0.1099 ± 0.0103
0.5759 ± 0.0423
0.1009 ± 0.0231
0.0823 ± 0.0160
4
Pix2Pix [ 7 ]
26.46 ± 0.33
92.25 ± 0.27
0.9561 ± 0.0032
0.0403 ± 0.0046
0.8302 ± 0.0530
0.0448 ± 0.0106
0.0358 ± 0.0080
4.86M
DiffI2I [ 23 ]
27.16 ± 0.54
92.50 ± 0.83
0.9609 ± 0.0054
0.0330 ± 0.0046
0.9028 ± 0.0145
0.0364 ± 0.0065
0.0287 ± 0.0047
16.39M
Conditional INR [ 22 ]
27.59 ± 0.33
93.90 ± 0.32
0.9650 ± 0.0029
0.0327 ± 0.0031
0.8642 ± 0.0132
0.0426 ± 0.0055
0.0342 ± 0.0043
0.85M
Table 1: Quantitative results of LF MRI synthesis. The mean ± standard deviation across five-fold cross-validation are reported. The best and second-best methods are highlighted in bold and underline, respectively.
T1
T2
Method
PSNR(dB)
SSIM(%)
PSNR(dB)
SSIM(%)
Subjects
Epoch
Real LF
30.12
92.93
29.26
92.61
13
200
Flip & Rotate
29.49
92.06
28.50
91.98
13 (*8)
400
Arnold et. al. [ 1 ]
30.37
93.48
29.39
92.75
13+147
150+50
Pix2Pix [ 7 ]
30.39
93.77
29.59
93.17
13+147
150+50
DiffI2I [ 23 ]
30.27
93.33
29.52
93.01
13+147
150+50
Table 2: Quantitative result of LF MRI enhancement augmented with synthetic data. The best and second-best methods are highlighted in bold and underline, respectively.
Ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI offers portable and accessible neuroimaging but suffers from reduced signal-to-noise ratio and limited spatial resolution compared to high-field (HF) systems. Acquiring paired ULF-HF data for supervised enhancement is often difficult, particularly in resource-limited settings. We introduce ULF-Synth, a framework that combines: (i) acquisition-based synthesis of realistic ULF images from HF volumes to create large-scale paired training data, (ii) a spatial-frequency domain objective that prioritizes recovery of high-frequency anatomical detail. This formulation is architecture-agnostic, consistently improving structural similarity and perceptual fidelity across encoder-decoder, adversarial, and diffusion-based translation models. When trained exclusively on synthetic data, the resulting models generalize effectively to real 64mT ULF acquisitions, improving downstream multiclass brain segmentation and achieving higher radiologist preference and diagnostic acceptability in a blinded reader study. These findings demonstrate that synthetic paired supervision provides a practical and scalable pathway for enhancing ULF MRI without requiring real paired acquisitions. Code, Models and Dataset: https://github.com/toufiqmusah/ULF-Synth
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana · University of Catania, Catania, Italy · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China +1
Low-field to high-field MRI synthesis has emerged as a promising strategy to improve image quality when access to high-field scanners is limited. However, in ultra-low-field settings, the degradation of anatomical detail is spatially heterogeneous: structurally ambiguous regions are more susceptible to unstable high-frequency generation, which may produce anatomically inconsistent textures and boundaries. This issue is particularly problematic when synthesized images are used for downstream quantitative analysis. We therefore study how to make diffusion-based LF-to-HF synthesis more spatially reliable, rather than only sharper on average. To this end, we propose a reliability-guided diffusion framework (ReDiff) with two complementary inference-time mechanisms. First, a reliability-guided sampling strategy attenuates unstable reverse-diffusion updates in regions with weak low-field support. Second, an uncertainty-aware candidate selection scheme aggregates multiple stochastic reconstructions according to spatial consensus and predictive uncertainty. Beyond aggregate image quality, we test whether the uncertainty is itself a usable reliability signal. Experiments on paired 64mT→3T MRI datasets show that ReDiff attains the lowest LPIPS across three contrasts and two datasets while remaining competitive on PSNR and SSIM, and downstream segmentation analysis indicates better preservation of anatomical structure.
Zhenxuan Zhang, Peiyuan Jing, Ruicheng Yuan +9
Department of Bioengineering and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, London, UK · Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia · National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK +2
Low-field (LF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) democratizes access to diagnostic imaging but is fundamentally limited by low signal-to-noise ratio and significant tissue contrast distortion due to field-dependent relaxation dynamics. Reconstructing high-field (HF) quality images from LF data is a blind inverse problem, severely challenged by the scarcity of paired training data and the unknown, non-linear contrast transformation operator. Existing zero-shot methods, which assume simplified linear degradation, often fail to recover authentic tissue contrast. In this paper, we propose DACT(Diffusion-Based Adaptive Contrast Transport), a novel zero-shot framework that restores HF-quality images without paired supervision. DACT synergizes a pre-trained HF diffusion prior to ensure anatomical fidelity with a physically-informed adaptive forward model. Specifically, we introduce a differentiable Sinkhorn optimal transport module that explicitly models and corrects the intensity distribution shift between LF and HF domains during the reverse diffusion process. This allows the framework to dynamically learn the intractable contrast mapping while preserving topological consistency. Extensive experiments on simulated and real clinical LF datasets demonstrate that DACT achieves state-of-the-art performance, yielding reconstructions with superior structural detail and correct tissue contrast.
Muyu Liu, Chenhe Du, Xuanyu Tian +5
School of Information Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China · School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China