cs.ROMar 27, 2026

Meta-Adaptive Beam Search Planning for Transformer-Based Reinforcement Learning Control of UAVs with Overhead Manipulators under Flight Disturbances

Authors: Hazim Alzorgan, Sayed Pedram Haeri Boroujeni, Abolfazl Razi

Organizations: School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29632, USA

Abstract

Drones equipped with overhead manipulators offer unique capabilities for inspection, maintenance, and contact-based interaction. However, the motion of the drone and its manipulator is tightly linked, and even small attitude changes caused by wind or control imperfections shift the end-effector away from its intended path. This coupling makes reliable tracking difficult and also limits the direct use of learning-based arm controllers that were originally designed for fixed-base robots. These effects appear consistently in our tests whenever the UAV body experiences drift or rapid attitude corrections. To address this behavior, we develop a reinforcement-learning (RL) framework with a transformer-based double deep Q learning (DDQN), with the core idea of using an adaptive beam-search planner that applies a short-horizon beam search over candidate control sequences using the learned critic as the forward estimator. This allows the controller to anticipate the end-effector's motion through simulated rollouts rather than executing those actions directly on the actual model, realizing a software-in-the-loop (SITL) approach. The lookahead relies on value estimates from a Transformer critic that processes short sequences of states, while a DDQN backbone provides the one-step targets needed to keep the learning process stable. Evaluated on a 3-DoF aerial manipulator under identical training conditions, the proposed meta-adaptive planner shows the strongest overall performance with a 10.2% reward increase, a substantial reduction in mean tracking error (from about 6% to 3%), and a 29.6% improvement in the combined reward-error metric relative to the DDQN baseline. Our method exhibits elevated stability in tracking target tip trajectory (by maintaining 5 cm tracking error) when the drone base exhibits drifts due to external disturbances, as opposed to the fixed-beam and Transformer-only variants.

Explore similar work

May 15, 2026

Adaptive Outer-Loop Control of Quadrotors via Reinforcement Learning

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for quadrotor flight control typically relies on Domain Randomization (DR) for sim-to-real transfer, resulting in overly conservative policies that struggle with dynamic disturbances. To overcome this, we propose a novel adaptive control architecture that actively perceives and reacts to instantaneous perturbations. First, we train an optimal outer-loop policy, then replace its reliance on ground-truth disturbance data with a Residual Dynamics Predictor (RDP). The RDP estimates the external forces and moments acting on the aircraft in flight online using only the history of states and control actions. For seamless hardware transfer, we introduce a data-efficient linear calibration bridge and an online thrust correction mechanism that align the simulated latent space with reality using mere seconds of flight data. Real-world validations on a Crazyflie micro-quadrotor demonstrate that our adaptive controller significantly outperforms baselines, maintaining precise trajectory tracking under severe uncertainties including mass variations, asymmetric payloads, and dynamic slung loads
Jun 15, 2026

Reinforcement Learning with Inner-loop Dynamics Estimator for Aerial Manipulation under Uncertainty

Aerial manipulators enable physical interaction in hard-to-reach environments; however, the combined problem of direct whole-body aerial manipulation under rapid arm motion, payload changes, and related unknown dynamic uncertainty remains a largely unsolved problem. We present a hierarchical control framework that combines Reinforcement Learning (RL) with an inner-loop dynamics estimator to address this problem. The RL outer loop maps desired 6-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) end-effector targets to coordinated whole-body commands, enabling direct task-driven control without relying on a fully accurate coupled dynamic model in the policy layer. An inner loop then tracks these commands while compensating for transient inertial shifts and uncertainty during execution via a dynamics estimator scheme without requiring system model knowledge. We validate the proposed approach on a custom quadrotor equipped with a 3-DoF manipulator through hardware experiments under varying payload conditions. Compared with RL+PID and RL+INDI+PID baselines, the proposed method reduces end-effector tracking error and improves task success rate across the tested hardware conditions. These results show that combining learned whole-body coordination with estimator-based low-level compensation improves the precision and robustness of aerial manipulation under changing operating conditions.
Jul 28, 2026

Physics-Aware End-to-End Deep Reinforcement Learning for Quadcopter Control with Actuator Dynamics

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), particularly quadcopters, present unique challenges for autonomous control due to their underactuated dynamics: only four available control inputs must govern six degrees of freedom. This paper investigates a physics-aware, end-to-end deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approach that acts directly on low-level body inputs, total thrust and body torques (T,τx,τy,τz)(T, τ_x, τ_y, τ_z), and closes the loop through a high-fidelity Simulink environment. Our simulator integrates a 12-state rigid-body model (MATLAB Level-2 S-Function) with (i) an Action2RPM allocation based on the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse of a coefficient matrix derived from thrust and drag terms, and (ii) first-order actuator dynamics for each motor (time constant Tm=0.076T_m = 0.076 s), including rotor gyroscopic coupling. A shaped reward balances goal-reaching and stability using an exponential position well, attitude penalties, and quadratic velocity costs. Four DRL algorithms, DDPG, TD3, PPO, and SAC, are evaluated in two stages: (S1) thrust-only hover and (S2) hover with pitch torque and a translated goal. Results show that SAC and TD3 achieve superior stability and exploration efficiency, while PPO is less sample-efficient. The study highlights the significance of modeling actuator lags and aerodynamic moments for stable low-level control and provides a reproducible benchmark for quadcopter DRL.