EVA: Bridging Performance and Human Alignment in Hard-Attention Vision Models for Image Classification
Organizations: The University of Tokyo
Abstract
Optimizing vision models purely for classification accuracy can impose an alignment tax, degrading human-like scanpaths and limiting interpretability. We introduce EVA, a neuroscience-inspired hard-attention mechanistic testbed that makes the performance-human-likeness trade-off explicit and adjustable. EVA samples a small number of sequential glimpses using a minimal fovea-periphery representation with CNN-based feature extractor and integrates variance control and adaptive gating to stabilize and regulate attention dynamics. EVA is trained with the standard classification objective without gaze supervision. On CIFAR-10 with dense human gaze annotations, EVA improves scanpath alignment under established metrics such as DTW, NSS, while maintaining competitive accuracy. Ablations show that CNN-based feature extraction drives accuracy but suppresses human-likeness, whereas variance control and gating restore human-aligned trajectories with minimal performance loss. We further validate EVA's scalability on ImageNet-100 and evaluate scanpath alignment on COCO-Search18 without COCO-Search18 gaze supervision or finetuning, where EVA yields human-like scanpaths on natural scenes without additional training. Overall, EVA provides a principled framework for trustworthy, human-interpretable active vision.
Figures & tables
| Model | Params | Time | FLOPs | Acc. | DTW | SM | NSS | AUC | GCS |
| (M) | (ms/im) | (B)↓ | (%) ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| CNN (ResNet18) | 11.18 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | 0.34 | 78.00 | - | - | - | - | - |
| CNN (MobileNetV3) | 4.21 | 0.94 ± 0.08 | 0.03 | 78.52 | - | - | - | - | - |
| TinyViT | 4.37 | 3.03 ± 0.22 | 2.66 | 68.21 | - | - | - | - | - |
| DeepGaze IIE | 0.2 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | - | - | 705.48 | 0.311 | 0.251 | 0.601 | 0.039 |
| Gazeformer | 0.27 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | - | - | 669.22 | 0.346 | 0.757 | 0.689 | 0.068 |
| Model | COCO | COCO-Search18 | DTW | SM | NSS | AUC |
| Acc.% | Acc.% | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| CNN MobileNet (pre.) | 58.82 | 27.5 | - | - | - | - |
| Gazeformer | - | - | 168.39 | 0.571 | 1.961 | 0.8 |
| Saccader-Mobile (pre.) | 57.1 | 16.7 | 333 | 0.242 | 0.361 | 0.658 |
| RAM | 34.81 | 12.83 | 500.01 | 0.072 | -0.132 | 0.585 |
| DRAM | 43.32 | 14.34 | 530.78 | 0.077 | -0.124 | 0.587 |
Appendix figures & tables8 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Model | Gaze Policy | ||||
| Predicted | Center-fixed | Corner-fixed | Random | Shuffled | |
| RAM | 61.6 | 45.1 (-16.5) | 12.8 (-48.8) | 43.5 (-18.1) | 61.3 (-0.3) |
| DRAM | 62.2 | 41.6 (-20.6) | 11.6 (-50.6) | 38.4 (-23.8) | 61.9 (-0.3) |
| MRAM | 58.3 | 44.1 (-14.2) | 13.6 (-44.7) | 48.7 (-9.6) | 56.9 (-1.4) |
| EVA | 79.8 | 57.6 (-22.2) | 19.6 (-60.2) | 70.5 (-9.3) | 71.3 (-8.5) |