In this paper, we investigated how the choice of a Wizard-of-Oz (WoZ) interface affects communication with a robot from both the user's and the wizard's perspective. In a conversational setting, we used three WoZ interfaces with varying levels of dialogue input and output restrictions: a) a restricted perception GUI that showed fixed-view video and ASR transcripts and let the wizard trigger pre-scripted utterances and gestures; b) an unrestricted perception GUI that added real-time audio from the participant and the robot c) a VR telepresence interface that streamed immersive stereo video and audio to the wizard and forwarded the wizard's spontaneous speech, gaze and facial expressions to the robot. We found that the interaction mediated by the VR interface was preferred by users in terms of robot features and perceived social presence. For the wizards, the VR condition turned out to be the most demanding but elicited a higher social connection with the users. VR interface also induced the most connected interaction in terms of inter-speaker gaps and overlaps, while Restricted GUI induced the least connected flow and the largest silences. Given these results, we argue for more WoZ studies using telepresence interfaces. These studies better reflect the robots of tomorrow and offer a promising path to automation based on naturalistic contextualized verbal and non-verbal behavioral data.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: An example of the Meta Quest Pro tracking the operator’s facial expression and displaying them on the Furhat robot in real-time.
Fig. 3: WoZ GUI in the middle of the conversation: 1) robot’s camera view; 2) dialogue history; 3) typing box; 4) dynamic buttons; 5) static buttons.
Fig. 4: Dialogue script flow.
Godspeed Section
Condition
Estimate
SE
Comparison
Estimate
SE
t-value
p-value
Anthropomorphism
Restricted GUI
2.15
0.17
Restricted GUI vs Unrestricted GUI
-0.6
0.18
-3.35
<.01
Unrestricted GUI
2.76
0.17
Restricted GUI vs VR
-0.93
0.18
-5.15
<.0001
VR
3.69
0.17
Unrestricted GUI vs VR
-1.54
0.18
-8.51
<.0001
Animacy
Restricted GUI
2.47
0.18
Restricted GUI vs Unrestricted GUI
-0.63
0.18
-3.43
<.01
Unrestricted GUI
3.10
0.18
Restricted GUI vs VR
-1.14
0.18
-6.21
<.0001
VR
3.61
0.18
Unrestricted GUI vs VR
-0.51
0.18
-2.78
<.01
TABLE II: Linear mixed model results for each section of the Godspeed questionnaire across the three interface conditions. N.s. stands for p-value > 0.05.
Social Presence Section
Condition
Estimate
SE
Comparison
Estimate
SE
t-value
p-value
Co-Presence
Restricted GUI
2.66
0.21
Restricted GUI vs Unrestricted GUI
-0.70
0.25
-2.80
<.001
Unrestricted GUI
3.37
0.21
Restricted GUI vs VR
-1.23
0.25
-4.89
<.0001
VR
3.90
0.21
Unrestricted GUI vs VR
-0.52
0.25
-2.09
<.05
Attention Allocation
Restricted GUI
3.14
0.18
Restricted GUI vs Unrestricted GUI
-0.73
0.24
-2.97
<.01
Unrestricted GUI
3.88
0.18
Restricted GUI vs VR
-0.77
0.24
-3.14
<.01
VR
3.92
0.18
Unrestricted GUI vs VR
-0.04
0.24
-0.16
n.s.
TABLE III: Linear mixed model results for each section of the Social Presence questionnaire across the three interface conditions. N.s. stands for p-value > 0.05.
Speech Parameter
Condition
Estimate
SE
Comparison
Estimate
SE
t-value
p-value
Speech Duration (participant)
Restricted GUI
92.90
8.36
Restricted GUI vs Unrestricted GUI
-13.57
5.44
-2.49
<.05
Unrestricted GUI
106.47
8.36
Restricted GUI vs VR
-30.55
5.27
-5.52
<.001
VR
123.45
8.42
Unrestricted GUI vs VR
-16.98
5.52
-3.07
<.005
Speech Duration (robot)
Restricted GUI
87.04
5.57
Restricted GUI vs Unrestricted GUI
-23.56
4.79
-4.91
<.001
Unrestricted GUI
110.6
5.57
Restricted GUI vs VR
8.96
4.85
1.84
n.s.
VR
78.08
5.62
Unrestricted GUI vs VR
32.52
4.85
6.69
<.001
TABLE IV: Linear mixed model results for comparing speech parameters across the three interfaces. Rows 1-4 show estimate in seconds, rows 5-7 show log-odds, n.s. stands for p-value > 0.05.
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 2Department of Computer Science, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, United States. · Department of Computer Science, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, United States.