CoE: Collaborative Entropy for Uncertainty Quantification in Agentic Multi-LLM Systems
Organizations: Shanghai Key Laboratory of Integrated Administration Technologies for Information Security School of Computer Science Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, China · School of Science and Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Shenzhen, China
Abstract
Uncertainty estimation in multi-LLM systems remains largely single-model-centric: existing methods quantify uncertainty within each model but do not adequately capture semantic disagreement across models. To address this gap, we propose Collaborative Entropy (CoE), a unified information-theoretic metric for semantic uncertainty in multi-LLM collaboration. CoE is defined on a shared semantic cluster space and combines two components: intra-model semantic entropy and inter-model divergence to the ensemble mean. CoE is not a weighted ensemble predictor; it is a system-level uncertainty measure that characterizes collaborative confidence and disagreement. We analyze several core properties of CoE, including non-negativity, zero-value certainty under perfect semantic consensus, and the behavior of CoE when individual models collapse to delta distributions. These results clarify when reducing per-model uncertainty is sufficient and when residual inter-model disagreement remains. We also present a simple CoE-guided, training-free post-hoc coordination heuristic as a practical application of the metric. Experiments on TriviaQA and SQuAD with LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct, and Mistral-7B-Instruct show that CoE provides stronger uncertainty estimation than standard entropy- and divergence-based baselines, with gains becoming larger as additional heterogeneous models are introduced. Overall, CoE offers a useful uncertainty-aware perspective on multi-LLM collaboration.
Figures & tables
| Uncertainty Metric | Two LLMs (Llama + Qwen) | Three LLMs (Llama + Qwen + Mistral) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rejection Accuracy | AURAC | AUROC | Rejection Accuracy | AURAC | AUROC | ||||||||
| 80% | 90% | 95% | 100% | 80% | 90% | 95% | 100% | ||||||
| Semantic Entropy | 0.625 | 0.583 | 0.579 | 0.575 | 0.176 | 0.670 | 0.394 | 0.416 | 0.468 | 0.375 | 0.123 | 0.687 | |
| Regular Entropy | 0.562 | 0.583 | 0.605 | 0.575 | 0.175 | 0.475 | 0.342 | 0.333 | 0.343 | 0.375 | 0.103 | 0.416 | |
| 0.575 | 0.575 | 0.575 | 0.575 | 0.172 | 0.586 | 0.375 | 0.405 | 0.405 | 0.375 | 0.117 | 0.540 | ||
| 0.625 | 0.583 | 0.589 | 0.575 | 0.177 | 0.661 | 0.368 | 0.388 | 0.437 | 0.375 | 0.116 | 0.716 | ||
Appendix figures & tables6 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| LLMs | TriviaQA Dataset | SQuAD Dataset | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Train Accuracy | Validation Accuracy | Train Accuracy | Validation Accuracy | ||
| Llama-3.1-8b-instruct | 0.65 | 0.675 | 0.225 | 0.1 | |
| Qwen-2.5-7b-instruct | 0.6 | 0.55 | 0.2 | 0.15 | |
| Mistral-7b-instruct | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.05 | 0.075 | |
LLM Uncertainty Estimation
Large language model uncertainty estimation measures when outputs may be wrong, ambiguous, or unreliable to guide safer decisions.
See all 398 papers