Vocal Prognostic Digital Biomarkers in Monitoring Chronic Heart Failure: A Longitudinal Observational Study
Organizations: Centre for Digital Health Interventions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland · Agentic System Lab, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland · Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland · Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA ·
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate which voice features can predict health deterioration in patients with chronic HF. Background: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition with progressive deterioration and acute decompensations, often requiring hospitalization and imposing substantial healthcare and economic burdens. Current standard-of-care (SoC) home monitoring, such as weight tracking, lacks predictive accuracy and requires high patient engagement. Voice is a promising non-invasive biomarker, though prior studies have mainly focused on acute HF stages. Methods: In a 2-month longitudinal study, 32 patients with HF collected daily voice recordings and SoC measures of weight and blood pressure at home, with biweekly questionnaires for health status. Acoustic analysis generated detailed vowel and speech features. Time-series features were extracted from aggregated lookback windows (e.g., 7 days) to predict next-day health status. Explainable machine learning with nested cross-validation identified top vocal biomarkers, and a case study illustrated model application. Results: A total of 21,863 recordings were analyzed. Acoustic vowel features showed strong correlations with health status. Time-series voice features within the lookback window outperformed corresponding standard care measures, achieving peak sensitivity and specificity of 0.826 and 0.782 versus 0.783 and 0.567 for SoC metrics. Key prognostic voice features identifying deterioration included delayed energy shift, low energy variability, and higher shimmer variability in vowels, along with reduced speaking and articulation rate, lower phonation ratio, decreased voice quality, and increased formant variability in speech. Conclusion: Voice-based monitoring offers a non-invasive approach to detect early health changes in chronic HF, supporting proactive and personalized care.
Figures & tables
| Vowel LLD features | |
|---|---|
| Feature Type | Features |
| Vocal-Source-Related LLDs (Phonation / Voice Quality) | Log HNR; jitter (local); shimmer (local); probability of voicing; glottal features (e.g., open quotient, amplitude quotient) |
| Vocal-Tract-Related LLDs (Articulation / Spectral) | MFCC 1–14; CPP; formants (F1, F2); spectrum bands 1–26 (0–8 kHz); spectral energy 250–650 Hz, 1–4 kHz; spectral roll-off points 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 0.90; spectral flux, centroid, entropy, slope, variance, skewness, kurtosis; psychoacoustic sharpness, harmonicity |
| Prosodic LLDs | Sum of auditory spectrum (loudness); F0 (pitch); RMS energy; zero-crossing rate |
| Speech features | |
| Feature Type | Features |
| Variable | V1 | V2 | S |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| Sex | Male (90.62%), Female (9.38%) | ||
| Smoking | Stopped (78.12%), Yes (12.5%), Never (9.38%) | ||
| Height (cm) | |||
| Native German speaker | Yes (81.25%), No (18.75%) | ||
| Last LVEF (%) |
| Feature | Best states | Worst states | Effect size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phonation ratio (Text) | 0.914 (0.048) | 0.826 (0.158) | 0.846 |
| Speaking rate (Text) | 4.061 (0.231) | 3.347 (0.958) | 0.805 |
| F1 Std (Command) | 16.771 (6.895) | 29.279 (15.859) | 0.702 |
| Articulation rate (Text) | 4.446 (0.325) | 4.078 (0.644) | 0.662 |
| Shimmer Q3 (/O/) | 8.309e 07 (7.032e 07) | 2.000e 06 (2.771e 06) | 0.638 |
| F1 FFT1 (Command) | 70.583 (39.714) | 118.773 (63.202) | 0.626 |
Clinical Outcome Prediction
Clinical outcome prediction uses patient records, imaging, signals, and biomarkers to estimate risks, disease trajectories, treatment response, and survival.
See all 265 papers