Organizations: School of Computer Science and Technology, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China · School of Information Science and Technology, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
Multilingual Pre-trained Language Models (MPLMs) have become essential tools for natural language processing. However, they often exhibit biases related to sensitive attributes such as gender, race, and religion. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive multilingual debiasing method named Multiple-Debias to address these issues across multiple languages. By incorporating multilingual counterfactual data augmentation and multilingual Self-Debias across both pre-processing and post-processing stages, alongside parameter-efficient fine-tuning, we significantly reduced biases in MPLMs across three sensitive attributes in four languages. We also extended CrowS-Pairs to German, Spanish, Chinese, and Japanese, validating our full-process multilingual debiasing method for gender, racial, and religious bias. Our experiments show that (i) multilingual debiasing methods surpass monolingual approaches in effectively mitigating biases, and (ii) integrating debiasing information from different languages notably improves the fairness of MPLMs.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: The framework of Multiple-Debias.
Model
DE
ZH
ES
JA
Avg. ( ↓ )
mBERT
8.48
2.50
4.26
3.58
4.71
+CDA
12.73
0.83
22.81
3.49
9.97
+SD
8.46
5.83
2.92
6.04
5.81
+MCDA
10.61
2.71
3.78
2.31
4.85
+MSD
0.83
3.33
2.98
3.43
2.64
+MD w/ Full Fine-Tune
5.06
4.17
0.92
0.50
2.66
TABLE I: Evaluation of Gender Bias on Multilingual CrowS-Pairs
Fig. 2: MBE bias scores of various debiasing methods on the mBERT model.
Fig. 3: MBE bias scores of various debiasing methods on the XLM-R model.
Model
DE
ZH
ES
JA
Avg. ( ↓ )
mBERT
4.74
15.00
5.00
3.33
7.02
+CDA
2.01
1.67
12.50
20.00
9.04
+SD
7.24
12.50
4.17
5.83
7.44
+MCDA
5.71
10.00
5.00
7.92
7.16
+MSD
5.56
6.67
5.83
7.50
6.39
+MD w/ Full Fine-Tune
2.93
6.67
3.33
8.33
5.32
TABLE II: Evaluation of Racial Bias on Multilingual CrowS-Pairs
Model
DE
ZH
ES
JA
Avg. ( ↓ )
mBERT
19.17
18.65
22.33
4.19
16.08
+CDA
22.50
22.07
23.21
9.25
19.26
+SD
6.67
6.77
12.24
2.52
7.05
+MCDA
17.71
16.57
22.55
3.36
15.05
+MSD
15.83
8.46
15.53
3.37
10.80
+MD w/ Full Fine-Tune
22.50
11.88
19.79
2.54
14.18
TABLE III: Evaluation of Religious Bias on Multilingual CrowS-Pairs
Language models (LMs) often acquire various biases during pre-training and may express them in interactions, potentially causing social harm. Existing methods often rely on counterfactual augmentation or representation projection. These strategies remain limited in practice due to their high computational costs and difficulty in scaling to larger models. Additionally, many of these strategies require manual data annotation, narrowing their scope to specific cultures and bias categories. To overcome these limitations, we propose HEIMAT, a HEurIstic-style autoMATic debiasing framework for LMs. HEIMAT consists of two main steps: bias disclosure and debiasing fine-tuning. In the first step, it uses simple templates to construct heuristic prompts, which are applied to reveal model biases and generate corresponding context prompts. In the second step, it fine-tunes the model by minimizing the Jensen-Shannon divergence of predictions on these context prompts to reduce bias. Extensive experiments show that HEIMAT effectively mitigates bias in different cultures while maintaining the model's natural language understanding (NLU) performance.
Tian Lan, Yemin Wang, Chuancheng Shi +6
Inner Mongolia University · Xiamen University · University of Sydney +3
The social biases and unwelcome stereotypes revealed by pretrained language models are becoming obstacles to their application. Compared to numerous debiasing methods targeting word level, there has been relatively less attention on biases present at phrase level, limiting the performance of debiasing in discipline domains. In this paper, we propose an automatic multi-token debiasing pipeline called General Phrase Debiaser, which is capable of mitigating phrase-level biases in masked language models. Specifically, our method consists of a phrase filter stage that generates stereotypical phrases from Wikipedia pages as well as a model debias stage that can debias models at the multi-token level to tackle bias challenges on phrases. The latter searches for prompts that trigger model's bias, and then uses them for debiasing. State-of-the-art results on standard datasets and metrics show that our approach can significantly reduce gender biases on both career and multiple disciplines, across models with varying parameter sizes.
Bingkang Shi, Xiaodan Zhang, Dehan Kong +4
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Engineering, Beijing 100093, China · Alibaba Group, Alibaba Artificial Intelligence Governance Laboratory, Beijing, China · University of Bristol, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK
While gender and racial biases in language models have been widely studied, anti-LGBTQ biases remain underexplored, particularly beyond English. Existing benchmarks often do not capture cultural and linguistic variation and rely on gender representations. This paper introduces a multilingual German-English benchmark dataset for the evaluation of anti-LGBTQ biases in language models. It combines community-sourced stereotypes from German-speaking queer individuals with a German translation of WinoQueer. The data is used to evaluate eight language models across sizes and architectures and explore mitigation through fine-tuning on community and progressive media content. Results show that language models reproduce anti-queer stereotypes, with variation across identities and models. Differences between the translated and community-based data highlight the importance of cultural adaptation for multilingual bias evaluation. Fine-tuning reduces bias on average, but not consistently across models and identities. Warning: This text contains examples of anti-queer hateful language and stereotypes.
Melina Morch, Daniel Braun
Marburg University · Computer Science · Cultural Data Studies +2