Uncertainty Quantification in CNN Through the Bootstrap of Convex Neural Networks

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become integral to a wide range of scientific and practical applications due to their flexibility and strong predictive performance. Despite their accuracy, however, DNNs frequently exhibit poor calibration, often assigning overly confident probabilities to incorrect predictions. This limitation underscores the growing need for integrated mechanisms that provide reliable uncertainty estimation. In this article, we compare two prominent approaches for uncertainty quantification: a Bayesian approximation via Monte Carlo Dropout and the nonparametric Conformal Prediction framework. Both methods are assessed using two convolutional neural network architectures; H-CNN VGG16 and GoogLeNet, trained on the Fashion-MNIST dataset. The empirical results show that although H-CNN VGG16 attains higher predictive accuracy, it tends to exhibit pronounced overconfidence, whereas GoogLeNet yields better-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Conformal Prediction additionally demonstrates consistent validity by producing statistically guaranteed prediction sets, highlighting its practical value in high-stakes decision-making contexts. Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of evaluating model performance beyond accuracy alone and contribute to the development of more reliable and trustworthy deep learning systems.

Steerable convolutional neural networks (Steerable-CNNs) guarantee SE(3)-equivariance by parameterizing kernels as linear combinations of steerable basis functions, but their deterministic nature precludes uncertainty quantification - limiting their use in settings where confidence estimates are essential. We propose a Bayesian Steerable-CNN that places posterior distributions over the basis coefficients, yielding stochastic kernels while preserving equivariance exactly. The loss function of the model is obtained via variational inference and minimized by Bayes-by-Backpropagation. The framework admits a decomposition of predictive uncertainty into epistemic and aleatoric components. Empirically, the model attains competitive classification accuracy alongside an expected calibration error of 0.0263 and outperforms its deterministic counterpart by up to 6.17% under distributional shift induced by additive Gaussian noise. Furthermore, we leverage the model's uncertainty estimates to enhance its performance significantly, achieving a notable gain - approximately 4% higher accuracy across 84% of the test dataset. A statistically significant negative correlation between epistemic uncertainty and prediction error confirms that the learned posterior variance is semantically meaningful. The framework unifies Bayesian uncertainty quantification with the inductive bias of equivariant CNNs.

The deployment of deep neural networks in safety-critical domains demands reliable estimates of predictive confidence, yet conventional architectures lack principled uncertainty quantification. This survey provides a structured, critical review of methods for Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in deep learning, scoped to ensemble-based and approximate Bayesian approaches and the measures used to summarize their outputs. Relative to existing UQ surveys, our contribution is depth on efficient ensemble approximations and single-pass methods, and a unified treatment that separates the method producing a predictive distribution from the measure that summarizes its uncertainty. We organize methods into five families: Bayesian neural networks, Monte Carlo Dropout, deep ensembles, efficient ensemble approximations, and last-layer or single-pass approaches. We situate adjacent work on evidential and prior networks, conformal prediction, and post-hoc calibration, together with the decision-time tasks of out-of-distribution detection and selective prediction. For each, we examine theoretical motivation, implementation, empirical performance, and limitations. We then review ensemble diversity theory and uncertainty measures and their decompositions, contrasting the entropy decomposition with pairwise divergence measures, and consolidate evaluation methodology so that our qualitative comparisons share a common basis. We close with a brief treatment of uncertainty in large language models and open research directions, including efficient epistemic measures for classification, last-layer diversity, diversity and calibration under shift, and hybrid architectures.