A Scoping Review of Large Language Model-Based Pedagogical Agents

While scaling laws for Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively studied along dimensions of model parameters, training data, and compute, the scaling behavior of LLM-based educational agents remains unexplored. We propose that educational agent capability scales not merely with the underlying model size, but through structured dimensions that we collectively term the Agent Scaling Law: role definition clarity, skill depth, tool completeness, runtime capability, and educator expertise injection. Central to this framework is AgentProfile, a structured JSON-based specification that serves as the mechanism enabling systematic capability growth of educational agents. We present EduClaw, a profile-driven multi-agent platform that operationalizes this scaling law, demonstrating its effectiveness through the construction and deployment of 330+ educational agent profiles encompassing 1,100+ skill modules across K-12 subjects. Our empirical observations suggest that educational agent performance scales predictably with profile structural richness. We identify two complementary scaling axes -- Tool Scaling and Skill Scaling -- as future directions, arguing that the path to more capable educational AI lies not solely in larger models, but in stronger structured capability systems.

Despite the rapid deployment of LLMs into classrooms, validating educational AI remains uniquely intractable: interventions act on developing learners whose cognitive and social trajectories are irreversibly shaped, while real-world trials are slow, ethically constrained, and institutionally locked. LLM-based educational simulators have emerged as a potential remedy, but many still collapse learning into persona-conditioned role-play and, when optimized only to reproduce existing classrooms, can structurally penalize the institutional novelty that pedagogical reform requires. In this work, we introduce AgentSchool, an LLM-driven multi-agent simulator that models learning as state transition rather than prompted behavior. AgentSchool couples cognitively growable student agents -- equipped with weighted subject knowledge graphs, thinking-workflow pools, and explicit misconceptions -- with adaptive teacher agents that plan, scaffold, and reflect along the Zone of Proximal Development, embedded in a configurable scenery generator that situates instruction within both formal and informal learning fields, and a multi-scale simulator that decouples interaction scale, temporal granularity, and simulation duration. Experiments show that structured student agents produce more differentiated mastery and misconception traces than a baseline simulator, while teacher-agent comparisons show backbone-dependent patterns consistent with ZPD-informed adaptation. Further, AgentSchool generates plausible traces of peripheral participation, clique formation, aggressor-induced cohesion, and opinion-leader emergence consistent with classroom social theories. Beyond its role as an educational research instrument, AgentSchool frames education as a socially meaningful testbed for long-horizon memory, multi-agent coordination, and future institutional reasoning under organizational pressure.

It is crucial to explore the impact of different teaching methods on student learning in educational research. However, real-person experiments face significant ethical constraints, and we cannot conduct repeated teaching experiments on the same student. LLM-based generative agents offer a promising avenue for simulating student behavior. Before large-scale experiments, a fundamental question must be addressed: are student agents truly credible, and can they faithfully simulate human learning? In this study, we built a Big Five Personality-based student agent model with a full pipeline of student-teacher interaction, self-study, and examination. To evaluate behavioral fidelity, we collected 13 empirical studies on Big Five traits and learning, and distilled them into 14 criteria. We found that the 71.4% of the student agents' behavior was aligned with human learners.